|
US$419.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 4 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
LY/T 3207-2020: Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) - Sweetgum(Liquidambar Linn.)
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| LY/T 3207-2020 | English | 419 |
Add to Cart
|
4 days [Need to translate]
|
Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) - Sweetgum(Liquidambar Linn.)
| Valid |
LY/T 3207-2020
|
PDF similar to LY/T 3207-2020
Basic data | Standard ID | LY/T 3207-2020 (LY/T3207-2020) | | Description (Translated English) | Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) - Sweetgum(Liquidambar Linn.) | | Sector / Industry | Forestry Industry Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | B61 | | Classification of International Standard | 65.020 | | Word Count Estimation | 18,175 | | Date of Issue | 2020-03-30 | | Date of Implementation | 2020-10-01 | | Regulation (derived from) | Announcement No. 6 of 2020 by the State Forestry and Grassland Bureau | | Issuing agency(ies) | State Forestry and Grassland Administration | LY/T 3207-2020: Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) - Sweetgum(Liquidambar Linn.)
---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and
stability-Sweetgum (Liquidambar Linn.)
ICS 65.020
B 61
LY
People's Republic of China Forestry Industry Standard
Specificity, consistency and stability of new plant varieties
Test Guide Liquidambar
2020-03-30 released
2020-10-01 implementation
Issued by the State Forestry and Grassland Administration
Table of contents
Foreword...II
1 Scope...1
2 Normative references...1
3 Terms and definitions...1
4 DUS test technical requirements...1
4.1 Test materials...1
4.2 Test method...1
5 Evaluation of specificity, consistency and stability...3
5.1 Specificity...3
5.2 Consistency...4
5.3 Stability...4
6 Variety grouping...4
6.1 Description of Variety Group...4
6.2 Grouping traits...4
7 Description of traits and related symbols...4
7.1 Types of traits...4
7.2 Express status and code...4
7.3 Expression types...5
7.4 Standard varieties...5
7.5 Legend description...5
Appendix A (normative appendix) Variety traits...6
Appendix B (informative appendix) Technical questionnaire...15
References...17
Foreword
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009 and GB/T.19957.1-2004.
Please note that certain contents of this standard may involve patents, and the issuing organization of this standard does not bear the responsibility for identifying these patents.
Appendix A of this standard is a normative appendix, and Appendix B is a normative appendix.
This standard was proposed and managed by the State Forestry and Grassland Administration.
Drafting organizations of this standard. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Huangshan College.
The main drafters of this standard. Lin Furong, Zheng Yongqi, Guo Wenying, Lai Jiuxin, Li Bin, Huang Ping, Sun Rongxi, Chen Li, Pan Jian, etc.
Guidance for testing the specificity, consistency and stability of new plant varieties Liquidambar
1 Scope
This standard specifies the specificity, consistency, and stability test techniques for new plant varieties of the Witch Hazel family Liquidambar Linn.
Technical requirements.
This standard is applicable to the testing of all new varieties of Liquidambar.
2 Normative references
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated reference documents, only the dated version applies to this article
Pieces. For undated references, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to this document.
GB/T 19557.1 General Principles for Testing the Specificity, Consistency and Stability of New Plant Varieties
3 Terms and definitions
The terms and definitions defined in GB/T 19557.1 apply to this standard.
4 DUS test technical requirements
4.1 Test materials
4.1.1 The applicant for variety rights shall submit test materials that meet the specified quantity and quality at the specified time and place. From non-testing country or place
For materials submitted by the district, the applicant must provide relevant documents such as customs and plant quarantine in accordance with relevant regulations on entry, exit and transportation.
4.1.2 The test materials submitted should be plants of more than 2 years old that are propagated by grafting, cutting or tissue culture.
The name of the rootstock used.
4.1.3 The number of test materials provided shall not be less than 10 plants.
4.1.4 The test materials provided must be plants that are free of pests and diseases and grow normally.
4.1.5 Except for the processing of materials permitted or required by the examination and approval authority, the submitted test materials shall not be subjected to any processing that affects the expression of traits.
Rationale. If it has been processed, details of the processing must be provided.
4.2 Test method
4.2.1 Test cycle
If the test conditions are met, at least one growth cycle should be tested.
4.2.2 Test location
The test should be carried out in the test base and laboratory designated by the approval agency.
4.2.3 Test conditions
The test should be carried out under the condition that the relevant characteristics of the test material can be fully expressed, and the selected test material should at least be determined at the test site
Planted for more than 2 years.
4.2.4 Test design
4.2.4.1 Each test must be based on 10 plants, and the test materials should be planted in the same place as the standard varieties and similar varieties
And environmental conditions.
4.2.4.2 If certain parts of the plant need to be extracted as samples for the test, the sample collection shall not affect the observation of the entire growth cycle of the test plant.
4.2.4.3 Unless otherwise stated, all observations must be made on 10 plants or materials taken from the same parts of 10 plants.
4.2.5 Test methods for similar traits
4.2.5.1 Plants (character numbers 1～6 in Table A.1 in Appendix A)
Select the normal growth test plants to visually observe the relevant traits from different angles. The surface morphology of the bark of the young tree and whether the wing is selected less than 10 years
The plants are observed.
4.2.5.2 Branches in the current year (character numbers 7 to 8 in Table A.1 in Appendix A)
At the end of spring and early summer, the middle section of the mature branches of the test plant was selected as the test material.
4.2.5.3 Leaves (the serial numbers of traits in Table A.1 in Appendix A are 10-15, 18, 21-31)
Unless otherwise specified, the mature leaves of the middle section of the upper branch of the test plant are selected as the test material for leaf and petiole traits during the growing season.
4.2.5.4 Fruit sequence. (Character sequence number 32～34 in Table A.1 in Appendix A)
Only adult plants (above 10a) are tested, and the globular fruit sequence that grows normally on the upper part of the crown is selected as the test material during the fruit ripening period.
4.2.6 Test methods for individual traits
4.2.6.1 Branches of the current year. anthocyanin colored parts (character number 9 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) trait test method
At the end of spring and early summer, the current year shoots at the top of the test plant were selected as the test material. Observe the anthocyanin colored parts of the branches of the year.
4.2.6.2 Leaf. main color of young leaves and main color of new leaves (character numbers 16 and 17 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) trait test method
In spring, the young leaves on the top of the current year’s shoots of the test plants are selected as the main color test materials for the young leaves, and the mature leaves at the bottom of the current year’s shoots
The main color of the new leaf. Observe the upper surface color of the leaf.
4.2.6.3 Leaf. main color in autumn (character number 19 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) Character test method
When more than 70% of the leaves show a seasonal color change in autumn, the mature leaves on the top of the tree crown of the test plant are selected as the test.
Material, observe the color of the upper surface of the blade.
4.2.6.4 Leaf. secondary color (character number 20 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) trait test method
In summer, the new leaves that were completely unfolded in the middle section of the current shoots of the test plants were selected as test materials. Observe the upper surface color of the leaf.
4.2.6.5 Phenological stage. the sprouting stage (the character number 35 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) character evaluation method
In early spring, select the winter buds at the top of the shoots in the middle and upper part of the tree crown of the plant for observation. When 30% of the bud scales of the winter buds begin to split, they are leaf buds
Budding period.
4.2.6.6 Phenological period. the initial period of autumn leaf discoloration (the character number 36 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) character evaluation method
Observation of the sun canopy of the test plants in autumn, the date when 10% of the leaves change color is the beginning of autumn leaves change color.
4.2.6.7 Phenological phase. the duration of autumn leaves (the character number 37 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) character evaluation method
In the fall, when 90% of the leaves on the canopy of the test plants fall off, it is the end of leaf fall.
4.2.6.8 Phenological stage. the end of deciduous stage (character number 38 in Table A.1 in Appendix A) trait evaluation method
In accordance with the test methods 4.2.6.7 and 4.2.6.8, from the beginning of autumn leaves to the end of autumn leaves, record the number of days from the beginning to the end.
4.2.7 Additional testing
For new hybrid varieties obtained through natural or artificial pollination, if the stability test is in doubt, the specificity and
For consistency and stability testing, when necessary, additional testing can be performed using the traits in Table A.1 or the traits not listed in this guide.
5 Evaluation of specificity, consistency and stability
5.1 Specificity
If the difference in traits is constant and significant, it is considered specific.
5.1.1 Constant difference
If the difference between the test material and similar species is very clear, only one growth cycle test is needed. In some cases due to environmental factors
When the difference between the test material and the similar species is not clear due to the influence of, at least 2 or more growth cycles are required.
5.1.2 Significant difference
Evaluation of the specificity of quality traits. As long as there is a difference between the test material and similar varieties in one trait, it can be determined that the variety has specificity.
Specific evaluation of quantitative traits. the test material is different from similar varieties in at least 2 traits, or the 2 codes of 1 trait are different
Different, it can be determined that the species has specificity.
Specific evaluation of false quality traits. the test material has at least 2 traits that are different from similar varieties, or 2 inconsistencies in 1 trait
If the code is different, it can be determined that the variety has specificity.
5.2 Consistency
The consistency judgment adopts the heterogeneous plant method. According to the 1% population standard and 95% reliability probability, the maximum allowable rate of heterotypic plants among 10 observed plants
The allowable value is 1.
5.3 Stability
5.3.1 The test materials of the applied variety meet the specificity and consistency requirements in the test, and the variety can be considered as stable.
5.3.2 In special circumstances or when there are doubts, it is necessary to pass the test for 1 growth cycle again, or the applicant shall provide new test materials.
Test whether it expresses the same characteristics as the previously provided test materials.
6 Variety grouping
6.1 Variety group description
Determine the grouping of test materials based on the grouping characteristics, and select similar varieties to be included in the specific growth test.
6.2 Grouping traits
6.2.1 Plant. The status of the main stem or side branches of the saplings (Characteristic No. 5 in Appendix A1).
6.2.2 Leaf. the number of lobes (character feature number 21 in Appendix A1).
7 Description of traits and related symbols
7.1 Types of traits
7.1.1 Asterisk traits (the traits marked with “(*)” in Table A.1 of Appendix A). refer to the unification of trait descriptions during the review of new varieties
For important variety traits used, all "star traits" should be tested when testing.
7.1.2 Plus sign traits (see the traits marked with "()" in Table A.1 in Appendix A). Refer to the performance of the traits in Appendix A1
Illustrated features (see Appendix A2).
7.2 Express status and code
The character description in Table A.1 in Appendix A has clearly given the standard definition of the expression state of each character, in order to facilitate the analysis of the expression state of the character.
Line description, analysis and comparison, each expression state has a corresponding digital code.
7.3 Expression types
GB/T 19557.1 provides the expression types of traits. qualitative traits (QL), quantitative traits (QN) and pseudo-qualitative traits (PQ)
Explanation of terms.
7.4 Standard varieties
A variety used to accurately and vividly demonstrate the expression state of a certain trait.
7.5 Legend
8 Technical questionnaire
Variety rights applicants should submit a technical questionnaire when applying, see Appendix B.
5.Comparison of similar varieties
Variety names similar to this variety.
Typical differences with similar varieties.
6.Summary of variety characteristics (detailed description in accordance with the content of the trait table in Appendix Table A1)
7.Additional information (can distinguish traits of varieties, etc.).
7.1 Adversity resistance and adaptability (drought resistance, cold resistance, waterlogging resistance, salt-alkali resistance, photosensitivity, resistance to pests and diseases, etc.).
7.2 Key points of reproduction.
7.3 Main points of cultivation management.
7.4 Other information.
8.Test requirements (special conditions required for testing of this variety).
9.Other information that helps to identify the application species.
Note. A4 paper supplementary explanation can be attached when the space reserved for each clause of the above form is insufficient.
Applicant’s Signature. Date. YYYY
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of LY/T 3207-2020_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate LY/T 3207-2020_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 2 ~ 4 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of LY/T 3207-2020_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of LY/T 3207-2020_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.
|