|
US$279.00 ยท In stock
Delivery: <= 3 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
RB/T 186-2017: Specification of evaluation for qualitative proficiency testing
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| RB/T 186-2017 | English | 279 |
Add to Cart
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
Specification of evaluation for qualitative proficiency testing
| Valid |
RB/T 186-2017
|
PDF similar to RB/T 186-2017
Basic data | Standard ID | RB/T 186-2017 (RB/T186-2017) | | Description (Translated English) | Specification of evaluation for qualitative proficiency testing | | Sector / Industry | Chinese Industry Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | A00 | | Word Count Estimation | 12,124 | | Date of Issue | 2017-01-03 | | Date of Implementation | 2017-08-01 | | Regulation (derived from) | State Accredidation Technology (2017) No.1 | | Issuing agency(ies) | National Certification and Accreditation Administration | RB/T 186-2017: Specification of evaluation for qualitative proficiency testing---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
(Qualitative class performance verification test evaluation specification)
ICS 03.120.20
A00
People's Republic of China certification and recognition of industry standards
Qualitative class ability verification result evaluation specification
Released on.2017-01-03
2017-08-01 implementation
China National Certification and Accreditation Administration issued
Content
Foreword III
Introduction IV
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms and Definitions 1
4 General 2
5 item 2
6 specified value 3
7 Results Analysis 4
8 Ability Assessment 6
Appendix A (informative) Examples of qualitative qualification verification plans 8
Foreword
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009.
This standard is proposed and managed by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
This standard was drafted. Beijing Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau of the People's Republic of China, China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, Hebei Medical
University of Science and Technology, Liaoning Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau of the People's Republic of China, China Academy of Inspection and Quarantine.
The main drafters of this standard. Bian Yong, Xu Wei, Wang Zhong, Wang Jing, Liu Laifu, Li Yan, Wang Youfu, Li Jianguang, Ge Jianjun, Zheng Chunsheng, Liang Xinmiao,
Bi Haitao, Wang Wanchun, Tian Jie, Zhang Lifeng.
Introduction
At present, the role of proficiency testing is increasingly evident and is becoming more widely used. From the current verification of capabilities, regardless of
What is its form, according to its type of results, can be roughly divided into quantitative proficiency testing, qualitative proficiency testing or both types of groups.
Application (some parameters are quantitative results, some parameters are qualitative results). Quantitative class proficiency testing uses a certain numerical value as a means of description.
If the results can be consistent within a certain range, the evaluation criteria are relatively uniform and have a clear traceability. Qualitative class proficiency testing focuses on
One or more characteristics of the proficiency test item are identified or described, and the results are mostly trait determination or description, with strong logic and push
Rationality is more susceptible to subjective factors near the qualitative change line. Currently, in the field of quantitative analysis, the operational specification of proficiency testing is especially
The method of evaluation of results is more mature and stable; in the field of qualitative analysis, the development of proficiency testing is relatively lagging, especially
The evaluation methods related to their results, whether they are international documents or domestic guidelines, are still blank. This standard passes the verification of qualitative ability
The results of the evaluation of the relevant elements of the norms help to promote the development of proficiency testing activities in the field of qualitative testing.
Qualitative class ability verification result evaluation specification
1 Scope
This standard specifies the requirements for the evaluation of the qualifications, the specified values, the results analysis and the capability assessment.
program.
This standard is applicable to the evaluation of the results performed by the proficiency testing provider in the process of conducting qualitative proficiency testing, and is also applicable to accreditation.
The organization's review of the proficiency testing provider.
2 Normative references
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only dated versions apply to this article.
Pieces. For undated references, the latest edition (including all amendments) applies to this document.
GB/T 27043 General requirements for conformity assessment
GB/T 28043 Statistical method for proficiency testing using inter-laboratory comparison
3 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions as defined in GB/T 27043 apply to this document. For ease of use, the following is repeated
Certain terms and definitions in GB/T 27043.
3.1
Proficiency testing
Use inter-laboratory comparisons to evaluate participants' abilities in accordance with pre-established guidelines.
[GB/T 27043-2012, 3.7]
3.2
Proficiency test scheme proficiencytestingscheme
One or more rounds of capability verification designed and operated in a specific area of inspection, measurement, calibration or inspection.
Note. A proficiency testing program may include one or more specific types of testing, calibration or inspection of proficiency testing items.
[GB/T 27043-2012, 3.11]
3.3
Proficiency test item proficiencytestingitem
Samples, products, artifacts, reference materials/standard samples, equipment parts, measurement standards, data sets or other for proficiency testing
information.
[GB/T 27043-2012, 3.8]
3.4
Specified value assignedvalue
A value or textual description given to a particular property of a proficiency test item.
3.5
Result value endvalue
Values or textuality of uniform units fed back by the laboratories participating in the proficiency testing program as requested by the proficiency testing provider
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of RB/T 186-2017_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate RB/T 186-2017_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of RB/T 186-2017_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of RB/T 186-2017_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.
|