| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| SN/T 2353-2009 | English | 359 |
Add to Cart
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
Codes of measurable grade management of sanitary supervision for storage field at frontier port
| Obsolete |
SN/T 2353-2009
|
PDF similar to SN/T 2353-2009
Basic data | Standard ID | SN/T 2353-2009 (SN/T2353-2009) | | Description (Translated English) | Codes of measurable grade management of sanitary supervision for storage field at frontier port | | Sector / Industry | Commodity Inspection Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | C62 | | Classification of International Standard | 11.020 | | Word Count Estimation | 9,978 | | Date of Issue | 2009-07-07 | | Date of Implementation | 2010-01-16 | | Quoted Standard | SN/T 1318 | | Regulation (derived from) | Industry standard filing Notice 2009 No. 10 (No. 118 overall) | | Issuing agency(ies) | General Administration of Customs | | Summary | This standard specifies the storage site at a frontier port health surveillance carried out quantitative score and classification of managed objects, the result is determined, and disposal. This standard applies to the country is the port storage site health supervision quantitative score and category management. | SN/T 2353-2009: Codes of measurable grade management of sanitary supervision for storage field at frontier port
---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Codes of measurable grade management of sanitary supervision for storage field at frontier port
Exit inspection and quarantine industry standard book People's Republic of China
Frontier port storage sites hygienic quantification
Category management procedures
Posted 2009-07-07
2010-01-16 implementation
People's Republic of China
The State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine released
Foreword
Appendix A of this standard is a normative appendix, Appendix B is an informative annex.
This standard is proposed and managed by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee.
This standard was drafted. People's Republic of China, Ningbo Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, People's Republic of China in Zhuhai
Exit Inspection and Quarantine.
The main drafters of this standard. Shihui Xiang, Zheng Jianning, Zhouli Pei Wang Yuchun, Zhang Sheng, Lu Yueyun, Wang Hong, Zhang Shun together, dual Yang Qing, Qiu Jiongliang,
Yangding Bo, Song Ye Ye.
This standard is the first release of the entry-exit inspection and quarantine industry standards.
Frontier port storage sites hygienic quantification
Category management procedures
1 Scope
This standard specifies the storage site at frontier ports to carry out hygienic quantification classified management ratings and objects, and determines and disposal.
This standard applies to storage sites frontier port health supervision quantitative score and category management.
2 Normative references
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this standard and become the standard terms. For dated references, subsequent
Amendments (not including errata content) or revisions do not apply to this standard, however, encourage the parties to the agreement are based on research
Whether the latest versions of these documents. For undated reference documents, the latest versions apply to this standard.
SN/T 1318 frontier port storage sites Health Supervision Regulations
3 objects
To obtain "health permits," the storage site.
4 Oversight Project
Press SN/T 1318 provisions content to carry out health supervision.
5 quantitative score
5.1-log
5.1.1 SN/T 1318 regulations procedures require health supervision.
5.1.2 Health Authority personnel under the supervision of the results fill in "frontier port storage sites hygienic quantification classified management score table" (see Appendix A).
Rating 5.2 Matters
5.2.1 points value column shows "※" projects identified as critical to oversee the project, in line with the requirements of the "√" mark does not meet the requirements with "×"
Mark, if one does not meet the requirements, as poor.
5.2.2 10 points, 5 points, 2 points is based on the size of the risk and the degree of harm to human health and the size of a given, if you find "content review" column description
The relevant circumstances described, then deduct the score.
5.2.3 The project can have no reasonable missing items, missing items at reasonable points column with "-" mark.
5.2.4 supervised venue actual score deserves the highest score by subtracting the value of the deduction.
5.2.5 The final score was standardized, standardized sub = resultant fraction/of the site deserve the highest score × 100.
6 results found
6.1 Supervision and evaluation of results
According to the score, to make a good, fair, poor hygiene supervision conclusions.
--- Standardized into more than 85 points (including 85 points) were evaluated as good;
--- Standardized as divided between 60 minutes to 85 minutes (including 60 minutes) general;
--- Standardized divided rated 60 points or less poor.
6.2 rating category management
6.2.1 storage sites classified management assessment for the first time in a year after the quantitative score, after assessment once every two years.
|