|
US$789.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 6 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
RB/T 051-2020: (Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide)
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| RB/T 051-2020 | English | 789 |
Add to Cart
|
6 days [Need to translate]
|
(Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide)
| Valid |
RB/T 051-2020
|
PDF similar to RB/T 051-2020
Basic data | Standard ID | RB/T 051-2020 (RB/T051-2020) | | Description (Translated English) | (Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide) | | Sector / Industry | Chinese Industry Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | A00 | | Word Count Estimation | 34,349 | | Date of Issue | 2020-08-26 | | Date of Implementation | 2020-12-01 | | Regulation (derived from) | National Certification and Accreditation Administration Announcement No. 21 of 2020 | | Issuing agency(ies) | National Certification and Accreditation Administration | RB/T 051-2020: (Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide)---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
(Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide)
ICS 03:120:20
A00
The People's Republic of China Certification and Accreditation Industry Standard
Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide
2020-08-26 released
2020-12-01 implementation
Issued by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Commission
Table of contents
Foreword Ⅰ
Introduction Ⅱ
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms and definitions 1
4 Evaluation Principle 2
4:1 Fairness 2
4:2 Evidence-based approach 2
4:3 Consistency 2
4:4 Confidentiality 2
5 Evaluation element 2
5:1 General 2
5:2 IMS scope and architecture 3
5:3 Leadership 3
5:4 Planning 4
5:5 Support 6
5:6 Operation 8
5:7 Performance Evaluation 10
5:8 Improvement 12
6 Evaluation criteria 13
6:1 General 13
6:2 Maturity Model 13
6:3 Criteria for element evaluation 14
6:4 IMS overall evaluation criteria 15
7 Evaluation Implementation 16
7:1 General 16
7:2 Evaluation of IMS maturity 17
Appendix A (informative appendix) Guidelines for scoring the maturity of IMS evaluation elements 18
Reference 30
Foreword
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1:1-2009:
This standard was proposed and managed by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee:
Drafting organizations of this standard: China Quality Certification Center, China Inspection Group Jiangsu Company, China Inspection Group Anhui Company, China Inspection Group Ningbo Company,
China National Accreditation Center for Conformity Assessment, Jianghuai Automobile Co:, Ltd:, Beijing Samsung Nine Thousand Certification Center, China Quality Assurance Center:
Drafters of this standard: Wang Yu, Dai Yaobin, Chai Yuebo, Ma Aiqun, Sun Yaling, Cao Xuemei, Bai Rui, Zhang Xudong, Liu Lixin, Zhang Jing, Ma Zhigang,
Zou Lungui:
Introduction
0:1 background
With the increasing demand for global economicization, trade globalization, and management standardization in specific fields, after the quality management system, the environment
Management system, occupational health and safety management system, energy management system, food safety management system, information security management system and other different management fields
Domain management system standards have been introduced one after another: According to incomplete statistics, ISO (International Organization for Standardization) has issued more management system requirements standards:
There are more than 40 items: In order to improve and prove their own management level, more and more organizations choose to apply multiple management system standards within the organization:
Especially the three management system standards: quality management system, environmental management system and occupational health and safety management system:
With the increase in application management system standards, management costs have also increased, forcing more and more organizations to choose the original multiple management
System integration, or directly establish an integrated management system (IMS) that meets the requirements of multiple management system standards to improve management efficiency
Rate and reduce operating costs: In order to enable a good integration of various management systems, ISO issued a management system standard in:2012
The high-level structure (HLS) of (MSS) creates a good opportunity for system integration:
In order to make the operation of the organization's integrated management system more effective, such as avoiding simple superposition, closely integrating with the organization's business process, and eliminating
The imbalance in the implementation effect of the requirements of various management system standards, etc:, the evaluation of the integrated management system and the identification of improvement opportunities have become very
important:
0:2 The role of IMS evaluation
IMS evaluation is a comprehensive and systematic review of the organization's IMS management system activities and results with reference to selected standards:
IMS evaluation is different from IMS audit:
---IMS audit is based on the relevant requirements of each integrated management system (such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001) to determine the organization's IMS
Whether it meets the requirements of various management system standards, the audit findings are used to determine the conformity of the organization's IMS with each management system standard and
Effectiveness: The IMS audit carried out by a third party is usually called a combined audit and is used for certification purposes:
---IMS evaluation can provide a comprehensive review of the overall performance of the organization and its IMS maturity level, which can help the organization identify the need to change
Areas for advancement and (or) innovation, and determine the priority of follow-up measures: Evaluation is not a simple compliance review but a mature system
Degree of evaluation:
IMS evaluation can be used as an evaluation and improvement tool other than management system audit: The output of the evaluation can show the strengths and weaknesses of the organization:
The level of potential and maturity, and the items that need improvement (risks and opportunities related to improvement): If carried out regularly, the organization
The progress and continuous improvement of IMS over a period of time: IMS evaluation results can be used as an important input for the organization of IMS management review:
0:3 Purpose of this standard
This standard aims to establish a model for the evaluation of the organization's integrated management system to provide guidance for the development of the evaluation of the integrated management system:
Guide, and make the evaluation results have relative consistency: Through evaluation, the organization can understand the degree of maturity of the integrated management system and discover
Improve opportunities, thereby continuously optimizing processes and resources, reducing duplication, improving the integrated management system and enhancing operational performance:
The evaluation elements in this standard refer to those given in Appendix SL of "ISO /IEC Guide Part 1" ISO Supplement
The content of the high-level structure (HLS) of the ISO management system standard (MSS):
Integrated Management System Evaluation Guide
1 Scope
This standard provides the principles, elements, criteria and implementation guidelines for the evaluation of the implementation of the integrated management system:
This standard is applicable to guide external agencies (including third-party agencies) to various types of organizations (regardless of their nature, scale, and product offerings):
Service) The evaluation of the maturity of the integrated management system and the evaluation of the integration of two or more management systems:
This standard can also be used to self-diagnose and evaluate the integration of multiple management systems:
2 Normative references
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document: For dated reference documents, only the dated version applies to this article
Pieces: For undated references, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to this document:
GB/T 19000 Quality Management System Foundation and Terminology
GB/T 24001 Environmental Management System Requirements and Guidelines for Use
3 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions defined in GB/T 19000 and GB/T 24001 apply to this document:
3:1
Integrated management system integrated management system; IMS
According to a certain degree of integration (3:2), a single management system that manages multiple aspects of organizational performance can meet the needs of two or more management systems:
Management system standards:
Note 1: The scope of the integrated management system can be a combination of multiple different management systems (based on different management system standards) to a single shared system
An integrated management system of system documents, management system elements and responsibilities:
Note 2: This definition is quoted from IAFMD11:2013:
3:2
Levelofintegration
In order to meet the requirements of more than one management system standard, the organization uses a single management system to manage multiple aspects of organizational performance
degree:
Note 1: Integration is for management that can integrate documents involving two or more management system standards, appropriate management system elements and responsibilities
system:
Note 2: When the degree of integration reaches 100%, it is called an integrated management system:
Note 3: This definition is quoted from IAFMD11:2013 and has been rewritten by adding Note 1 and Note 2:
3:3
Maturity
The degree to which the research object reaches the ideal state:
Note 1: The connotation of maturity has two points: one is to determine the perfect state of the object (based on current understanding, relative perfect state); the other is to determine the current state of the object
State, and the gap with perfect state:
Note 2: Generally speaking, the maturity of the research object will have one or more sub-dimensions to measure: It can be measured by percentage or grade:
There is a certain correspondence between the judgment standards:
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of RB/T 051-2020_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate RB/T 051-2020_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 4 ~ 6 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of RB/T 051-2020_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of RB/T 051-2020_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.
|