|
US$509.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 5 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
HJ 981-2018: Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| HJ 981-2018 | English | 509 |
Add to Cart
|
5 days [Need to translate]
|
Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry
| Valid |
HJ 981-2018
|
PDF similar to HJ 981-2018
Basic data | Standard ID | HJ 981-2018 (HJ981-2018) | | Description (Translated English) | Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry | | Sector / Industry | Environmental Protection Industry Standard | | Classification of Chinese Standard | Z04 | | Word Count Estimation | 22,226 | | Issuing agency(ies) | Ministry of Ecology and Environment | HJ 981-2018: Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry
---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry
National Environmental Protection Standard of the People's Republic
Technical Guide for Strong Sources of Pollution Sources Coking Chemical Industry
Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity
Coking chemical industry
Published on.2018-11-27
2019-01-01 implementation
Ministry of Ecology and Environment released
Content
Foreword. II
1 Scope.1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms and Definitions 2
4 source strong accounting program..2
5 Strong source method for waste gas pollution source..6
6 Wastewater pollution source and source strong accounting method..8
7 Noise source strong accounting method 10
8 Solid waste source strong accounting method.10
9 other.11
Appendix A (informative appendix) Coking chemical industry source strength accounting results and related parameter list form 12
Appendix B (informative appendix) Technology and effect of waste gas pollution control in coking chemical industry.15
Appendix C (informative appendix) Coking chemical industry wastewater pollution control technology and effect..17
Appendix D (informative) The noise source of the coking chemical industry and the noise reduction effect of control measures. 18
Appendix E (informative) The amount of solid waste generated in the coking chemical industry.19
Foreword
To implement the Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China, the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China
Pollution Prevention and Control Law, Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Environmental Noise Pollution, "The Chinese People's Republic of China
Laws and regulations on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Wastes, etc., improve the system of strong accounting methods for fixed sources of pollution, and guide and standardize coking chemistry
This standard is formulated for the strong accounting of industrial pollution sources.
This standard specifies the basic principles, contents, and accounting methods for the strong accounting of waste gas, wastewater, noise, and solid waste pollution sources in the coking chemical industry.
Law and requirements, etc.
Appendix A to Appendix E of this standard are informative annexes.
This standard is the first release.
This standard is formulated by the Department of Environmental Impact Assessment and Emission Management of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, and the Department of Regulations and Standards.
This standard is mainly drafted by. Environmental Engineering Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Hebei Zhonglian Energy Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Metallurgical Worker
Industry Planning Institute.
This standard is approved by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment on November 27,.2018.
This standard has been implemented since January 1,.2019.
This standard is explained by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment.
Technical Guide for Strong Sources of Pollution Sources Coking Chemical Industry
1 Scope of application
This standard stipulates the basic principles, contents, accounting methods and requirements for the strong accounting of pollution sources in the coking chemical industry.
This standard applies to the new (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source of the coking chemical industry and the strong accounting of existing engineering pollution sources.
This standard applies to the source and strong accounting of normal and abnormal emissions of the coking chemical industry, and is not applicable to sudden leaks, fires, explosions, etc.
Strong source accounting in the event of an accident.
This standard applies to waste gas from production processes such as coal preparation, coking, coke treatment, gas purification, coking chemical product recovery and thermal energy utilization.
Wastewater, noise, and solid waste pollution sources are strongly accounted for. Coking furnace types include conventional coke ovens, heat recovery coke ovens, and semi-coke (blue carbon) carbonization furnaces.
The source of boiler pollution carried out by GB 13223 is calculated according to HJ 888; the source of boiler pollution by GB 13271 is strong according to the boiler.
The source code for strong source accounting for pollution is accounted for.
2 Normative references
This standard refers to the following documents or their terms. For undated references, the valid version applies to this standard.
GB 12348 industrial enterprise boundary noise emission standard
GB 13223 Thermal Power Plant Emission Standards for Thermal Power Plants
GB 13271 Boiler Air Pollutant Emission Standard
GB 16171 Coking Chemical Industry Pollutant Emission Standard
GB/T 16157 Determination of particulate matter in fixed pollution source exhaust gas and sampling method of gaseous pollutants
HJ 2.1 General Outline of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction Projects
HJ 2.2 Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Atmospheric Environment
HJ 2.3 Environmental Impact Assessment Technical Guidelines Surface Water Environment
HJ 2.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Technical Guidelines Acoustic Environment
HJ 75 Fixed pollution source flue gas (SO2, NOX, particulate matter) continuous monitoring technical specifications
HJ 76 Fixed pollution source flue gas (SO2, NOX, particulate matter) continuous monitoring system technical requirements and testing methods
HJ/T 91 Surface Water and Wastewater Monitoring Technical Specifications
HJ/T 92 Water Pollutant Total Monitoring Technical Specification
HJ/T 353 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Installation Technical Specification (Trial)
HJ/T 354 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Acceptance Technical Specification (Trial)
Technical Specifications for Operation and Assessment of HJ/T 355 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System (Trial)
HJ/T 356 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Data Validity Discrimination Technical Specification (Trial)
HJ/T 373 Technical Specifications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Fixed Pollution Source Monitoring (Trial)
HJ/T 397 Fixed Source Exhaust Gas Monitoring Technical Specification
HJ 630 Environmental Monitoring Quality Management Technical Guidelines
HJ 708 Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Steel Construction Project
HJ 819 General Guidelines for Self-Monitoring Technical Units of Sewage Units
HJ 878 Self-monitoring technical guide for sewage disposal units Steel industry and coking chemical industry
HJ 884 Guidelines for Strong Sources of Pollution Sources
HJ 888 Pollution Source Power Accounting Technical Guide
Announcement on Issue of Pollution Discharge Coefficient and Material Accounting Method for Calculating Pollutant Emissions (Protection of Environmental Protection Department, No. 81,.2017)
number)
3 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this standard.
3.1
Gas total sulfur content total sulfur in gasoline
Refers to the total mass of all sulfur elements in a unit volume of gas, including inorganic sulfur, organic sulfur and so on.
3.2
Standard condition
It refers to the state when the temperature is 273.15 K and the pressure is 101325 Pa. The concentration of atmospheric pollutants specified in this standard is in the standard state.
The dry gas is the benchmark.
3.3
Abnormal discharge
Refers to the discharge of pollutants under abnormal conditions of pollution prevention (control) facilities, such as dust removal facilities, desulfurization facilities, denitration facilities failure or inspection
Emissions under abnormal conditions such as maintenance.
4 source strong accounting procedures
4.1 General principles
The strong source accounting procedures include pollution source identification and pollutant determination, accounting method and parameter selection, source strength accounting, and accounting results.
For details, see HJ 884 for details.
4.2 Identification of pollution sources
Coking chemical industry pollution source identification should cover all places, equipment or equipment that may generate waste gas, wastewater, noise, solid waste pollutants or
The device is shown in Table 1.
The identification of pollution sources shall comply with the requirements of HJ 2.1, HJ 2.2, HJ 2.3, HJ 2.4, HJ 708 and so on.
4.3 Determination of pollutants
The determination of pollutants in various pollution sources in the coking chemical industry shall include pollutants in national and local emission standards such as GB 16171.
Table 1. Contaminants that may be produced in the production process but not included in national or local pollutant discharge standards may be based on environmental quality standards.
Other industry standards, other national emission standards, local people's governments or eco-environmental authorities, environmental quality improvement needs, according to raw materials
The materials and fuel use and production process conditions are analyzed and determined.
4.4 Accounting method selection
The methods of calculating the source of pollution in the coking chemical industry include the actual measurement method, the analogy method, the material balance algorithm and the pollution yield coefficient method, etc.
The order of priority selection is shown in Table 1. The source strength accounting method should be selected in order of priority. If the priority method cannot be adopted, reasonable reasons should be given.
Table 1 Selection table of strong accounting methods for pollution source of coking chemical industry
Element pollution source pollutant project
Accounting method and prioritization
New (reform, expansion)
Engineering pollution source
Existing engineering
Source of pollution
Exhaust gas
Organized
(normal row
put)
Clean coal crushing, coke crushing, screening
And transport facility particulate matter
Analogy method
2. Pollution coefficient method 1. Actual measurement method
Coal loading facility
Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 1. analogy method 2. pollution coefficient method 1. actual measurement method
Benzo[a]芘1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method
Pushing coke facilities particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 1. Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method 1. Actual measurement method
Coke oven chimney
Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 2. pollution production coefficient method 1. actual measurement method
Sulfur dioxide 1. Material balance algorithm 1. Actual measurement method
Dry quenching facility
Particulate matter 1. analogy method 2. pollution coefficient method 1. actual measurement method
Sulfur dioxide 1. Material balance algorithm 1. Actual measurement method
Crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia
Design of burning coke oven gas such as decomposition furnace
Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 2. pollution production coefficient method 1. actual measurement method
Sulfur dioxide 1. Material balance algorithm 1. Actual measurement method
Cold drum, tar storage in various storage areas
Benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen cyanide, phenols,
Non-methane total hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia 1. Analogy method 1. Measured method
Benzene storage tank benzene, non-methane total hydrocarbons 1. Analogy method 1. Measured method
Desulfurization regeneration tower hydrogen sulfide, ammonia 1. Analogy method 1. Actual measurement method
Ammonium sulfate crystal drying facility, particulate matter, ammonia 1. Analogy method 1. Actual measurement method
Organized
(unusual
emission)
Clean coal crushing, coke crushing, screening
And transfer facility particles 1. analogy
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy a
Coal loading facilities particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, benzo[a]
芘1. Analogy
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy a
Pushing coke facilities particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 1. Analogy method 1. Actual measurement method 2. Analogy method a
Coke oven chimney
Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a
Sulfur dioxide
Analogy method
2. Material balance algorithm
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy a
Dry quenching facility
Particulate matter 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a
Sulfur dioxide 1. analogy method 2. material balance algorithm
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy a
Crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia
Design of burning coke oven gas such as decomposition furnace
Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a
Sulfur dioxide 1. analogy method 2. material balance algorithm
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy a
Continued
Element pollution source pollutant project
Accounting method and prioritization
New (reform, expansion)
Engineering pollution source
Existing engineering
Source of pollution
Exhaust gas
Organized
(unusual
emission)
Cold drum, tar storage in various storage areas
Benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen cyanide, phenols,
Non-methane total hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia
1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a
Benzene storage facility benzene, non-methane total hydrocarbon
Desulfurization regeneration tower hydrogen sulfide, ammonia
Ammonium sulfate crystal drying facility particulate matter, ammonia
Unorganized
Coal yard, clean coal crushing, coke crushing,
Screening and transfer facility particulate matter 1. analogy method 1. analogy method
Coke oven body particles, benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen sulfide,
Ammonia, benzene solubles 1. analogy method 1. analogy
Various storage tanks benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen cyanide, benzene, phenol
Class, non-methane total hydrocarbons 1. analogy method 1. analogy
Waste water
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzo[a]芘1. analogy method in the wastewater discharge port of workshop or production facility 1. Measured method
Independent coking enterprise wastewater discharge or
Iron and steel complex coking plant wastewater
exhaustion hole
Suspended matter, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen,
5th day biochemical oxygen demand, total phosphorus, total
Nitrogen, petroleum, volatile phenol, vulcanization
Matter, benzene, cyanide
Analogy method
2. Pollution coefficient method 1. Actual measurement method
Noise, various fans, pumps, air compression
Noise level of noise sources such as machines and crushers 1. Analogy
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy a
Solid Waste
Tar ammonia water separation device, ammonia tower,
Ammonium sulfate saturator, desulfurization facility, off
Nitrogen facility, phenol cyanide wastewater treatment station
And various dust removal facilities
Coal dust, coke dust, tar residue, regeneration
Residue, ammonia residue, acid tar,
Biochemical sludge, desulfurization waste liquid, desulfurization
Waste residue, waste denitration agent, etc.
Analogy method
2. Pollution coefficient method
Actual measurement method
2. Analogy
Note. The existing engineering pollution sources are not manually monitored according to relevant management requirements, automatic monitoring equipment for installation of pollutants or automatic monitoring equipment does not meet the requirements.
In the process of environmental impact assessment management, it shall be calculated according to the method in this table after rectification according to law; in the process of sewage permit management, in accordance with the discharge permit
The relevant regulations can be accounted for.
a When the existing project pollution sources are strongly accounted for, when there are multiple pollution sources of the same type in the same enterprise, other pollution sources can be compared with the same type of pollution sources in the enterprise.
The pollution source data accounting source is strong.
4.4.1 Exhaust gas
4.4.1.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source
In the normal discharge, the gas burning facilities such as coke oven chimney, crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia decomposition furnace, and the coke dry quenching facility
The sulphur oxide is calculated by the material balance algorithm; the sulphur dioxide in the coal charging and pushing facilities is preferentially calculated by the analogy method, and the sulphurization coefficient method is used.
Count. Particulate matter and nitrogen oxides are preferentially calculated by analogy method, followed by the pollution yield coefficient method;
Analogy accounting. Other feature factors are accounted for by analogy. The unorganized source of exhaust gas is calculated by analogy.
In the case of abnormal discharge, the exhaust gas source is calculated by the analogy method, and the coal burning stove such as coke oven chimney, crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia decomposition furnace
The material balance algorithm can also be used for sulfur dioxide in gas facilities and sulfur dioxide source in dry quenching facilities.
4.4.1.2 Existing engineering pollution sources
In normal discharge, the organized source strength of the exhaust gas is calculated by the actual measurement method. When using the actual method to calculate the source strength, the HJ 878 and the enterprise
It can be used for the automatic monitoring of pollution factors, and can only be validated by effective automatic monitoring data; for HJ 878 and corporate sewage
The automatic monitoring of pollution factors is not required for licenses, etc., and automatic monitoring data is preferred, followed by manual monitoring of data. No exhaust gas
Weaving source strength uses the analogy method for accounting.
In the case of abnormal emissions, the exhaust gas source is calculated by the actual measurement method, and secondly, the measured data of the same type of pollution source is abnormal.
Count.
4.4.2 Waste water
4.4.2.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source
The pollution source of the wastewater discharge port of the workshop or production facility is calculated by analogy.
The pollution source of the waste water discharge port of the independent coking enterprise or the coking branch of the iron and steel complex enterprise is preferentially calculated by analogy method.
The calculation is based on the pollution coefficient method.
4.4.2.2 Existing engineering pollution sources
The source of pollution is calculated by the actual measurement method. When using the actual measurement method to calculate the source strength, the requirements for HJ 878 and enterprise sewage permit are adopted.
The pollution factor of the dynamic monitoring can only be calculated by using effective automatic monitoring data; it is not required for HJ 878 and enterprise sewage discharge permit.
With automatic monitoring of pollution factors, automatic monitoring data is preferred, followed by manual monitoring of data.
4.4.3 Noise
4.4.3.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source
The source of pollution is strongly calculated using the analogy method.
4.4.3.2 Existing engineering pollution sources
The source of pollution is prioritized by the actual measurement method, followed by the analogy method.
4.4.4 Solid waste
4.4.4.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source
The source of pollution is preferentially calculated by analogy method, and secondly by the pollution coefficient method.
4.4.4.2 Existing engineering pollution sources
The source of pollution is prioritized by the actual measurement method, followed by the analogy method.
4.5 Pollutant emissions accounting
The discharge of pollutants should include both normal and abnormal emissions, and the sum of emissions or emissions of all sources,
(1) Calculation.
( )'
DDD
= ∑ (1)
Where. the amount of pollutants produced or discharged during the D-accounting period, t;
During the Di-accounting period, the production or discharge of a certain pollutant under normal conditions, t;
Di'-the production or emission of a certain pollutant under abnormal conditions in a certain period of time, t;
n - the number of sources of pollution, the amount of dimension one.
4.6 Summary of accounting results
See Appendix A for the format of strong source accounting results.
5 Strong source method for waste gas pollution sources
5.1 Material Balance Algorithm
5.1.1 General principles
The material balance algorithm is suitable for the oxidation of pollutants from combustion gas sources such as coke oven chimney, crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying, ammonia decomposition furnace, etc.
Strong accounting of sulfur source and strong accounting of sulfur dioxide source in dry quenching facilities.
For the new (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source source strong accounting parameters, the relevant data in the design data can be obtained.
5.1.2 Sulfur dioxide
The source of sulfur dioxide, such as coke oven chimney, crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying, ammonia decomposing furnace, etc., is strongly calculated according to formula (2).
( 10 ) 2 1
100i i
Fg
D fg s η−
= × × × × −
(2)
Where. D - the amount of sulfur dioxide emissions during the accounting period, t;
Fg - the amount of the i-th fuel used in the accounting period, 104m3;
Ifg
s - total sulfur content of the i-th fuel in the accounting period, mg/m3;
Η-desulfurization efficiency, %;
n - the type of fuel, the amount of dimension one.
The sulfur dioxide source of the CDQ facility is strongly calculated according to formula (3).
twenty one
QSD Q λ η = × × × × −
(3)
Where. D - the amount of sulfur dioxide emissions during the accounting period, t;
Q - the amount of coke dry quenching during the accounting period, t;
Qs - total sulfur content in coke during the accounting period, %;
Λ-coke burning rate, %
η - desulfurization efficiency, %.
5.2 Analogy
Emissions of exhaust pollutants can be accounted for in comparison with valid measured data of exhaust pollutants of existing devices that meet the following conditions. class
The specific conditions include.
a) the composition of the coal and fuel are similar;
b) the parameters of furnace type, carbonization chamber height and width are the same;
c) the same production process;
d) The pollution control measures are similar, and the pollutant design removal efficiency is not lower than the analog object removal efficiency.
5.3 Measurement method
5.3.1 The actual measurement method is to calculate the pollutant discharge amount through the actual exhaust gas emission and the corresponding pollutant discharge concentration, which is suitable for effective measurement.
Existing engineering sources of pollution that automatically monitor or manually monitor data.
5.3.2 Data accounting using automatic waste gas monitoring system
The exhaust gas pollution source that installs the automatic monitoring system and is connected with the competent department of ecological environment shall adopt effective automatic monitoring in accordance with relevant regulations.
Data accounting for the source of exhaust pollutants. The use of automatic monitoring data to calculate the source of exhaust gas pollutants should be used for all hourly averages during the accounting period.
The data is calculated. The pollution source automatic monitoring system and data must comply with HJ 75, HJ 76, HJ/T 373, HJ 630, HJ 819, HJ 878.
And the discharge permit of the sewage unit.
The source of exhaust gas pollution is calculated according to formula (4).
(10)
D qρ
= × ×∑ (4)
Where. D - the amount of pollutants discharged during the accounting period, t;
ρ - standard measured emission concentration of the first hour of a pollutant in the standard state, mg/m3;
q - the first hour of exhaust emissions in the standard state, m3/h;
n - Pollutant discharge time during the accounting period, h.
5.3.3 Manual monitoring of data accounting using exhaust gas
Automatically monitor the pollutants that the system fails to monitor or the pollution sources and pollutants that are not installed in the automatic monitoring system, and use law enforcement monitoring and sewage disposal orders.
Manual monitoring data such as self-monitoring, accounting for strong source of pollutants. The use of manual monitoring data to calculate the source strength of pollutants should be used within the accounting ...
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of HJ 981-2018_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate HJ 981-2018_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 3 ~ 5 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of HJ 981-2018_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of HJ 981-2018_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.
|