|
US$629.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 6 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
GB/T 39173-2020: Smart factory - The effectiveness assessment methods of safety monitoring
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| GB/T 39173-2020 | English | 629 |
Add to Cart
|
6 days [Need to translate]
|
Smart factory - The effectiveness assessment methods of safety monitoring
| Valid |
GB/T 39173-2020
|
PDF similar to GB/T 39173-2020
Basic data | Standard ID | GB/T 39173-2020 (GB/T39173-2020) | | Description (Translated English) | Smart factory - The effectiveness assessment methods of safety monitoring | | Sector / Industry | National Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | N10 | | Classification of International Standard | 25.040.40 | | Word Count Estimation | 34,380 | | Date of Issue | 2020-10-11 | | Date of Implementation | 2021-05-01 | | Regulation (derived from) | National Standard Announcement No. 21 of 2020 | | Issuing agency(ies) | State Administration for Market Regulation, China National Standardization Administration | GB/T 39173-2020: Smart factory - The effectiveness assessment methods of safety monitoring---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
(Smart factory safety monitoring effectiveness evaluation method)
ICS 25.040.40
N10
National Standards of People's Republic of China
Evaluation method of safety monitoring effectiveness of smart factory
2020-10-11 released
2021-05-01 implementation
State Administration for Market Regulation
Issued by the National Standardization Management Committee
Table of contents
Preface Ⅲ
Introduction Ⅳ
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms and definitions 1
4 Abbreviations 3
5 General requirements 3
5.1 Objective 3
5.2 Stage 3 of carrying out effectiveness evaluation
5.3 Personnel requirements 3
5.4 Detector evaluation requirements 4
5.5 Evaluation Technology 4
5.6 Evaluation Process 4
5.7 Evaluation tool 6
5.8 Data collection 6
5.9 Evaluation Report 6
6 Evaluation of the effectiveness of flame detector safety monitoring 7
6.1 Evaluation requirements 7
6.2 Identification of hazard types 7
6.3 Defining the fire area 7
6.4 Definition of coverage target 8
7 Evaluation of effectiveness of safety monitoring of combustible gas detector 8
7.1 Evaluation requirements 8
7.2 Identification of hazard types 8
7.3 Defining risk areas 9
7.4 CFD calculation and input 9
7.5 Definition of coverage target 10
8 Evaluation of the effectiveness of safety monitoring of toxic gas detectors 10
8.1 Evaluation requirements 10
8.2 Identification of hazard types 11
8.3 Defining risk areas 11
8.4 CFD calculation and input 12
8.5 Definition of coverage target 13
9 Evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasonic detector safety monitoring 13
9.1 Purpose 13
9.2 Identification of hazard types 13
9.3 Defining risk areas 13
9.4 Coverage target 14
Appendix A (informative appendix) Detector coverage assessment technology 15
Appendix B (informative appendix) Leakage frequency of typical equipment 18
Appendix C (informative appendix) Three-dimensional digital model 20
Appendix D (informative appendix) CFD calculation process and method 22
Appendix E (informative appendix) Applicable area of smart factory heat detectors 25
Appendix F (informative appendix) Table of fire zone classification for typical hydrocarbon installations 26
Appendix G (Informative Appendix) Definition of Leakage Volume in Scenario Analysis 28
References 29
Figure 1 Safety monitoring effectiveness evaluation process 5
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of risk layer depth 9
Figure 3 Schematic diagram of the depth of toxic gas risk layer 12
Figure A.1 Ammonia compressor gas risk layer and gas detection coverage 16
Figure A.2 Flame risk layer and flame detection coverage of ammonia compressor 16
Figure C.1 Front view of 3D model (*.dgn format) 20
Figure C.2 45° top view of 3D model (*.dgn format) 20
Figure C.3 Top view of 3D model (*.dgn format) 21
Figure D.1 Dividing a solid grid 22
Figure D.2 Average wind speed calculated based on scene 23
Figure F.1 Schematic diagram of the fire zone risk layer of a hydrocarbon installation 27
Figure G.1 Schematic diagram of 2.5kg/s methane release 28
Table 1 Fire zone level 7
Table 2 Target value of flame detector coverage 8
Table 3 Combustible gas cloud size 9
Table 4 Depth of risk layer 9
Table 5 Target value of coverage rate of combustible gas detector 10
Table 6 Size of toxic gas cloud 11
Table 7 Depth of toxic gas risk layer 11
Table 8 Target value of coverage rate of toxic gas detector 13
Table 9 Noise area, detector alarm threshold and detection range classification 14
Table 10 Effectiveness evaluation target value of ultrasonic detector 14
Table B.1 Leakage frequency of pressure vessels 18
Table B.2 Leakage frequency of atmospheric storage tank 18
Table B.3 Leakage frequency of pump valve 18
Table B.4 Leakage frequency of compressor 18
Table B.5 Leakage frequency of pipelines and pipelines 19
Table B.6 Leakage frequency of filter 19
Table B.7 Leakage frequency of other equipment 19
Table F.1 Fire zone classification table of typical hydrocarbon installations 26
Foreword
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009.
Please note that certain contents of this document may involve patents. The issuing agency of this document is not responsible for identifying these patents.
This standard was proposed by China Machinery Industry Federation.
This standard is under the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Process Measurement Control and Automation Standardization Technical Committee (SAC/TC124).
Drafting organizations of this standard. Design Branch of China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau Engineering Co., Ltd., Comprehensive Technical and Economic Research on Instrumentation of Machinery Industry
Institute, Meisian (China) Safety Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai Hehan Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Energy Group Co., Ltd., Sinopec
Industrial Co., Ltd. Qingdao Safety Engineering Research Institute, China National Petroleum Corporation Safety and Environmental Technology Research Institute, Sinopec Guangzhou
Engineering Co., Ltd., Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Jidi Ace Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing Rio Tinto Energy-saving Engineering Technology
Co., Ltd., Beijing Xinghuo Boan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., China Test Testing and Certification Group Co., Ltd., Beijing Labor Protection Scientific Research
Institute, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Tsinghua University, PetroChina Pipeline Co., Ltd. West-East Gas Pipeline Company, China National Petroleum Corporation
The company's Western Pipeline Branch, China National Petroleum Corporation Southwest Pipeline Branch.
The main drafters of this standard. Bu Zhijun, Li Lin, Liu Yao, Zhu Minglu, Wang Tao, Dai Ye, Pan Yu, Li Yuming, Zhang Zhiling, Wang Huaiyi, Shi Xueling,
Wenkewu, Ji Zhijun, Yang Bingxiong, Liu Haihai, Guan Tiangang, Jin Shengxiang, Mei Dongsheng, Ma Wanjun, Xu Deteng, Luo Fangwei, Liang Shuang, Ma Yunli, Sha Beiyi,
Chen Tao, Wang Yongfu, Liu Panchao, Li Kai, Xiao Lian, Chen Xiaohua, Chen Xiaohua, Jin Jianghong, Zhao Jinsong, Zhang Liming, Jiang Weiwei, Zhang Weihua, Wang Gang, Liu Xiaojing.
Introduction
The purpose of this standard is to provide methods for evaluating the effectiveness of safety monitoring in smart factories. This method uses computer simulation and other intelligence
Means, to ensure that the detector meets the needs of the smart factory use environment, and provide an appropriate reference for future safety monitoring effectiveness evaluation. An
The full monitoring effectiveness evaluation adopts a quantitative method to calculate the coverage rate of flame, combustible gas, toxic gas and other detectors, and set the detector layout
Plan for verification and optimization. It is an effective means to prevent dangerous accidents and control the severity of consequences. Its advantages are.
---Compared with qualitative analysis, it can provide quantitative coverage and layout plan to avoid the influence of subjective factors on the effectiveness of safety monitoring;
---Although the quantitative analysis process is complicated, the results are accurate, and this method can be used to optimize the analysis conclusions after qualitative analysis;
---Use three-dimensional design results to carry out evaluation, and provide visual analysis process and results.
The effectiveness of safety monitoring is a prerequisite for the evaluation of the functional safety integrity of the safety monitoring system and an important part of the effectiveness of the safety monitoring system.
Through the effectiveness assessment of safety monitoring, reliable and timely monitoring of industries involving the leakage of flames, combustible gas and toxic gas can be achieved.
Evaluation method of safety monitoring effectiveness of smart factory
1 Scope
This standard specifies the general requirements for the effectiveness evaluation method of safety monitoring, flame, combustible gas, toxic gas and ultrasonic detector safety
Methods of monitoring effectiveness evaluation.
This standard applies to the safety monitoring of flames, combustible gases, toxic gases and ultrasound in smart factories in the petroleum, petrochemical, and natural gas fields.
Test for effectiveness evaluation. Smart factories in other fields can be implemented by reference.
2 Normative references
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated reference documents, only the dated version applies to this article
Pieces. For undated references, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to this document.
GB 50116-2013 Code for design of automatic fire alarm system
GB/T 50493-2019 Design standard for the detection and alarm of combustible gas and toxic gas in petrochemical industry
3 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this document.
3.1
flammable gas
Combustible gas or combustible vapor formed by vaporization of Class A gas or Class A, B and A combustible liquids.
Note 1.Also known as flammable gas.
Note 2.Rewrite GB/T 50493-2019 and define 2.0.1.
3.2
Toxic gas
In the process of occupational activities, workers contact or breathe toxic gases or vapors that can cause death or permanent health damage through skin contact.
[GB/T 50493-2019, definition 2.0.2]
3.3
Release source
The location or location that can release and form an explosive gas environment or a toxic gas environment.
[GB/T 50493-2019, definition 2.0.3]
3.4
detector
Electronic equipment that converts the concentration of combustible gas, toxic gas or oxygen into electrical signals.
Note 1.Also known as detector.
Note 2.Rewrite GB/T 50493-2019 and define 2.0.4.
3.5
Safety monitoring
It is used in the monitoring and detection of flame, combustible gas and toxic gas in smart factory.
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of GB/T 39173-2020_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate GB/T 39173-2020_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 4 ~ 6 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of GB/T 39173-2020_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of GB/T 39173-2020_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.
|