Path: Home > GB/T > Page736 > GB/T 47018-2026 || Home > Standard_List > GB/T > Page736 > GB/T 47018-2026
| Std ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status |
| GB/T 47018-2026 | English | RFQ |
ASK
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
Evaluation specifications for classification and grading of digital transformation service providers
| Valid |
Standard similar to GB/T 47018-2026 GB/T 43195 | GB/T 42451 | GB/T 43268 | GB/T 47021 | GB/T 47019 | Basic data | Standard ID | GB/T 47018-2026 (GB/T47018-2026) | | Description (Translated English) | Evaluation specifications for classification and grading of digital transformation service providers | | Sector / Industry | National Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | L70 | | Classification of International Standard | 35.240.50 | | Word Count Estimation | 122,166 | | Date of Issue | 2026-01-28 | | Date of Implementation | 2026-05-01 | | Issuing agency(ies) | State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China | GB/T 47018-2026: Evaluation specifications for classification and grading of digital transformation service providers
---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
ICS 35.240.50
CCSL70
National Standards of the People's Republic of China
Digital Transformation Service Provider Classification and Grading Evaluation Standards
Published on 2026-01-28
Implemented on May 1, 2026
State Administration for Market Regulation
The State Administration for Standardization issued a statement.
Table of contents
Preface III
1.Scope 1
2 Normative References 1
3.Terms and Definitions 1
4.Abbreviations 1
5.Classification and Grading Framework 1
Level 6, 2
7 categories 3
7.1 Overview 3
7.2 Digital Integrated Service Provider 4
7.3 Digital Consulting Service Providers 4
7.4 Digital Evaluation Service Providers 4
7.5 Digital Operations Service Providers 5
7.6 Digital R&D Service Providers 5
7.7 Digital Manufacturing Service Providers 6
7.8 Digital Infrastructure Service Providers 6
7.9 Digital Equipment Service Providers 7
7.10 Digital Technology Service Providers 7
8.Competency Requirements
8.1 Requirements for Digital Consulting Service Providers
8.2 Requirements for Digital Evaluation Service Providers (15)
8.3 Requirements for Digital Operations Service Providers 21
8.4 Requirements for Digital R&D Service Providers 37
8.5 Requirements for Digital Manufacturing Service Providers (52)
8.6 Requirements for Digital Infrastructure Service Providers (74)
8.7 Requirements for Digital Equipment Service Providers (92)
8.8 Requirements for Digital Technology Service Providers (102)
9.Evaluation Methods 114
9.1 General Rule 114
9.2 Preliminary evaluation 114
9.3 Official rating 114
9.4 Release of evaluation results 115
10.Service Provider Level Determination Methods 115
10.1 Scoring Method 115
10.2 Rating weight 115
10.3 Calculation Method 115
10.4 Level Determination 116
References 117
Foreword
This document complies with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Standardization Work Guidelines Part 1.Structure and Drafting Rules of Standardization Documents".
Drafting.
Please note that some content in this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document assumes no responsibility for identifying patents.
This document was proposed and is under the jurisdiction of the National Information Technology Standardization Technical Committee (SAC/TC28).
This document was drafted by. China Electronics Technology Standardization Institute, China Unicom Digital Technology Co., Ltd., and China Coal Research Institute Co., Ltd.
Company, Hunan Mowei Information Technology Co., Ltd., China Textile Information Center, China Oil & Gas Pipeline Network Corporation, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
Group Limited, Beijing Zhiwang Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Tsinghua University, Kingdee Software (China) Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Saixi Technology Development Co., Ltd., Boyan Technology Co., Ltd., Zhizaobang (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Zhiyongkaiwu Artificial Intelligence
Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Langguang Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Inspur Enterprise Cloud Technology (Shandong) Co., Ltd.
Company, Inspur General Software Co., Ltd., China Welfare Lottery Technology Development (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia Mengniu Dairy (Group) Co., Ltd.
Hollysys Kaotech Technology Co., Ltd., Guming Technology Group Co., Ltd., Siemens (China) Co., Ltd., Dassault Systèmes (Shanghai) Information Technology Co., Ltd.
Han Weicai, Hou Chao, Shan Mingxian, Luo Liren, Wang Mingyan, Geng Xiao, Li Hua, Xiao Wenshu, Bai Min, Ji Hande, Zheng Xu.
Digital Transformation Service Provider Classification and Grading Evaluation Standards
1 Scope
This document defines the classification and grading framework, levels, categories, and capability requirements for digital transformation service providers, and describes the corresponding evaluation methods.
And the method for determining the level.
This document is applicable to potential digital transformation clients selecting suitable digital transformation service providers, and can also be used by regulators and evaluators for data analysis.
Provides a basis for selecting digital transformation service providers.
2 Normative references
This document has no normative references.
3 Terms and Definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this document.
3.1
Providing enterprises with products, technologies, and services in a specific professional field during the digital transformation process enables them to effectively carry out their digital transformation work.
Service provider.
3.2
process optimization
By utilizing real-time production data, algorithm models, and artificial intelligence technology, manufacturing process parameters, paths, and resource allocation are dynamically optimized.
The process of continuous improvement in quality, efficiency, and cost.
4.Abbreviations
The following abbreviations apply to this document.
APP. Mobile Internet Application
PaaS. Platform as a Service
SaaS. Software as a Service
The digital transformation service provider classification and grading framework consists of capability levels, service provider categories, and capability requirements. The service provider category is further divided into service provider classes.
Subcategories are composed of different service providers with varying capability levels. These capability requirements include team capabilities, product capabilities, and service capabilities.
Efforts, implementation results, and knowledge accumulation are shown in Figure 1.
|