CCAP-GZ-6105-2019_English PDF
Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
CCAP-GZ-6105-2019 | English | 1439 |
Add to Cart
|
6 days [Need to translate]
|
Implementation Rules for CCAP Mark Certification of Motor Vehicle Products -- Car door lock and door holder
| |
CCAP-GZ-6105-2019
|
Standard ID | CCAP-GZ-6105-2019 (CCAP GZ-6105-2019) | Description (Translated English) | Implementation Rules for CCAP Mark Certification of Motor Vehicle Products -- Car door lock and door holder | Sector / Industry | China Certification Center for Automotive Products - CCC Implementation Detailed-Rules | Word Count Estimation | 36,379 | Date of Implementation | 18/10/2019 |
CC AP-GZ-6105-2019
Implementation Rules for CC AP Mark Certification of Motor Vehicle Products - Car door lock and door holder
Number. CC AP-GZ-6105..2019
Motor vehicle products CC AP mark certification implementation rules car door locks and door holders
Published on October 18,.2019
2019-10-18 Implementation
China Auto Certification Center Co., Ltd.
table of Contents
0 Introduction...1
0.1 Terms and definitions...1
0.2 Classification management requirements of production enterprises...1
0.3 Requirements for the use of testing resources by manufacturing companies...2
1 Scope...3
2 Certification standards...3
3 Selection of certification mode and related requirements...4
3.1 Basic authentication mode...4
3.2 Applicability of the certification model...4
4 Division of certification units...4
5 Certification Commission...5
5.1 Certification process...5
5.2 Certification entrustment materials...5
5.3 Certification Scheme and Certification Contract...6
6 Certification Implementation...6
6.1 Type test...6
6.2 Initial factory inspection...8
6.3 Certification evaluation and decision...10
6.4 Time limit for certification...10
6.5 Maintenance parts of discontinued models...11
7 Supervision after certification...11
7.1 Follow-up inspection after certification...11
7.2 Taking samples for testing or inspection at the production site...12
7.3 Market sampling inspection or inspection...12
7.4 Frequency and time of supervision after certification...13
7.5 Post-certification supervision records...13
7.6 Evaluation of supervision results after certification...13
8 Certification...13
8.1 Retention of certification...13
8.2 Contents of the certificate...13
8.3 Change of certification...13
8.4 Cancellation, suspension and revocation of certification...14
8.5 Use of Certificates...14
9 Certification mark... 14
9.1 Approved logo styles...14
9.2 Requirements for use...15
10 Fees...15
11 Certification Responsibility...15
12 Process and time limits related to technical disputes, complaints, appeals...15
Attachment 1 Product Description of Car Door Locks and Door Holders...16
Attachment 2 Type test items...18
Annex 3 Requirements for production consistency...19
Appendix 1 Factory Quality Assurance Ability Requirements...21
Attachment 4 Requirements for preparation of production consistency control plan and execution report...25
Appendix 1 Recommended Format for Production Consistency Control Plan...28
Annex 5 Implementation of certification of spare parts for after-sales maintenance of discontinued models...31
0 Preface
In order to implement the spirit of the National Accreditation Administration's "Guiding Opinions on Further Promoting Voluntary Product Certification", ensure that
Announcement of the General Administration of Market Supervision on Adjusting and Improving the Catalogue and Implementation Requirements of Compulsory Product Certification (No. 44 of.2019)
The smooth transition of the reform measures will not affect the normal supply relationship of the complete vehicle and parts and components, China Automobile Certification Center Co., Ltd.
Convert car door locks and door retainers (CC C subclass 1112) that are no longer subject to mandatory product certification management to CC AP
Mark product certification, the scope of application and requirements are consistent with the original mandatory product certification management requirements.
0.1 Terms and definitions
0.1.1 Utilize production enterprise equipment testing (referred to as TMP method)
The engineers of the contracted laboratory use the testing equipment of the factory laboratory for testing, and the factory should send testing personnel to
assist. The test report shall be issued by the relevant contracted laboratory for review and approval.
0.1.2 Witness inspection of production enterprises (referred to as WMT method)
The engineers of the contracted laboratory witnessed the inspection conditions of the factory laboratory and the factory laboratory used its own equipment to complete
All inspections or inspection plans submitted to the factory, witnessing some inspection conditions and inspection items. Factory laboratory testing
The personnel are responsible for issuing the original records and drafting the test report in accordance with the prescribed format together with the witnessing contracted laboratory engineers. by
The relevant contracted laboratory shall review and approve and issue the test report.
0.2 Classification management requirements of production enterprises
CC AP conducts risk assessment and classification of certified companies based on the relevant information of certified companies obtained from various sources,
It also adopts differentiated management models and risk control measures for different types of enterprises to ensure the validity of the certification.
CC AP will classify certified enterprises into four categories of A, B, C and D for classification management.
0.2.1 Information sources of classified management
(1) Factory inspection findings and inspection conclusions (including initial factory inspection, follow-up supervision inspection and other special inspections);
(2) Test results of type testing and supervision sampling (production site sampling or market sampling);
(3) National and provincial quality supervision spot checks and other spot checks conclusions;
(4) Administrative supervision, law enforcement inspection information and disposal records of competent government departments at all levels;
(5) Integrity record and certification behavior normative record of the implementation process of enterprise certification application, expansion, change, etc.;
(6) Complaints and product recalls related to product quality and certification of the enterprise, product recalls, government, social and media exposure at all levels
Public opinion risk information of public and social image;
(7) Other information.
0.2.2 Classification principles for certified enterprises
The classification principles of certified enterprises are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Classification principles of certified enterprises
Classification principles
1 The factory inspection within the past 2 years (including. initial factory inspection, follow-up inspection after certification) has not found serious non-compliance
Items and nonconformities that affect or potentially affect product consistency;
2 After the certification, the supervision and inspection found no non-conformances, and the results of various national and provincial product quality supervision and random inspections are all
"qualified";
3 When necessary, enterprises need to have good independent design capabilities; their own testing resources are recognized by mutual recognition of ILAC agreement
The organization can be accredited according to the ISO /IEC 17025 standard, or equivalently meet GB/T 27025 (ISO /IEC
17025) Chapter 5 technical capability requirements, testing capabilities should cover all type test items of certified products;
4 During the supervision period, the products covered by the certificate shall be kept at a certain level;
5 The enterprise's quality is in good standing and credibility, there is no record of dishonesty in the certification process, and there is no bad record of normative behavior of certification; no right
No complaints from companies and certified products, market and public information are adversely reflected.
B Except for Class A, C, and D companies, other certified companies and companies without quality information.
1 There are serious non-conformities in the initial factory inspection or follow-up inspection after certification; or there are general non-conformities, but the conclusion
It is determined that "on-site verification" is required;
2 The quality of the product exposed by the media has problems and is the responsibility of the company, but does not involve suspension or revocation of the certificate;
3 CC AP considers that it needs to be adjusted to category C based on the comprehensive evaluation results of information related to manufacturing companies and certified products.
1 The initial factory inspection and the follow-up inspection conclusion after the certification is judged as "failed";
2 After the certification, the result of supervision and inspection is that the safety item is unqualified;
If there are “unqualified” in the relevant type test items in the results; or the factory inspection and/or supervision sampling are rejected without justification
Kind
3 Due to product quality defects, product recalls, media exposure and corporate responsibility, which have a greater impact on product safety,
The certification can be suspended or revoked directly;
4 Those who cannot meet the certification requirements of other CC AP mark products have been suspended and their certifications are revoked
5 CC AP considers that it needs to be adjusted to category D based on the comprehensive evaluation results of information related to manufacturing companies and certified products.
0.2.3 Classification evaluation and results
Before the annual follow-up inspection, CC AP will inform the certified company of the information on the classification management level determination/adjustment of the certified company.
CC AP will combine all the relevant information collected, combining the classification principles and the CC AP classification management regulations for production enterprises
It is scheduled to implement dynamic management of production enterprises, re-evaluate and adjust classification results regularly, when certified enterprises appear
When major issues affecting the risk assessment results, CC AP will directly assign the company to the high-risk category at any time based on the evaluation results
do not. On the contrary, if there is evidence that the factors leading to the risk have been effectively controlled, the enterprise does not reappear in the second supervision and inspection
Bad records, CC AP will also be adjusted to low-risk categories in order of D→C→B→A according to the risk assessment
whole.
0.3 Requirements for the utilization of testing resources by production enterprises
0.3.1 range
It is applicable to the supervision sampling test after the certification and the supplementary difference test when the certificate is changed.
0.3.2 Implementation
If the production enterprise has the testing equipment and testing capabilities required by the certification standard, the certification client, producer or production enterprise
The industry may apply to CC AP for the use of production enterprise testing resources (hereinafter referred to as factory laboratories) and conduct self-examination. will
The self-examination results and related materials are submitted to CC AP for review with the application. Approved by CC AP (organized contract laboratory participation)
Only the factory laboratory that meets the requirements can use the testing resources of the production enterprise to implement TMP testing (or WMT testing) at the production site.
In order to reduce the burden on the enterprise, in principle, CC AP does not organize a separate audit of the factory laboratory, and the certification client
The factory laboratory’s application for review can be submitted at the same time as the on-site testing application or can be submitted separately. CC AP will
Organize contracted laboratory technical experts to conduct on-site verification, and save the corresponding audit assessment records. Audit team's experiment on the factory
Only after passing the competence audit of the laboratory, can the factory laboratory be used for testing.
0.3.3 Maintenance of qualifications
In principle, CC AP will conduct periodic supervision and verification of approved factory laboratories in conjunction with annual supervision and inspection.
When necessary, the factory laboratory will be organized to participate in the comparison test to ensure the accuracy and validity of the test results.
If the production enterprise has a demand, it can conduct a single verification of the on-site testing items proposed by the certification client, and the verification results
Only valid for this on-site testing project. Factory laboratories can no longer carry out supervision and maintain qualifications. There is another project that needs to be cashed
During field testing, you should apply for review again.
1 Scope of application
This rule applies to.
(1) Door locks for the side doors (including sliding doors) or rear doors of passenger cars on M1 and N1 vehicles for passenger entry and exit;
(2) Door hinges for the side or rear doors of vehicles on M1 and N1 vehicles for passenger entry and exit, excluding guides for sliding doors
Rails and other supporting components.
Due to changes in laws and regulations or related product standards, technologies, industrial policies and other factors, the scope of application is adjusted
The announcement shall be subject to the announcement issued by the CNCA.
2 Certification basis
GB 15086-2013 Performance requirements and test methods for automobile door locks and door retainers
In principle, the above standards should implement the latest version issued by the national standardization administrative department. When you need to use the standard
For other versions, it shall be implemented in accordance with the announcement issued by CC AP and applicable standards.
3 Selection of certification mode and related requirements
3.1 Basic authentication mode
The basic certification model for implementing the CC AP logo certification for automotive door locks and door holder products is.
Post-certification supervision of initial factory inspection of type test
The post-certification supervision in the above basic certification model includes two methods of follow-up inspection and supervised sampling testing after certification.
Among them, supervised sampling inspection also includes sampling inspection or inspection on the production site and market sampling inspection or inspection.
3.2 Applicability of the certification model
CC AP will increase/decrease certification elements as appropriate based on the basic certification model for different types of enterprises
Combinations, including.
Class A. Post-certification supervision can use follow-up inspection after certification, production site sampling samples for inspection or inspection, market
One or a combination of three methods of sampling or inspection.
Class B, C, and D production enterprises. after certification, the follow-up inspection and supervision sampling test (production
One or a combination of on-site sampling or market sampling).
The selection of the certification mode for the manufacturer of repair parts of discontinued vehicle models can be based on Annex 5.
Based on the characteristics of the products applying for certification and the principles of certification risk control, CC AP, combined with the classification management results of
Set the certification mode applicable to the certification client.
4 Division of certification units
In principle, the same producer (manufacturer) and the same production enterprise (place) produced no significant difference in the following aspects
Different automotive door locks and door retainer products are considered a certification unit.
4.1 Door lock
(1) The structural form of the lock body and lock (or stop);
(2) Material of main components;
(3) Connection method with vehicle.
4.2 Door hinge
(1) The structural form of the door hinge and the materials of the main components;
(2) The difference between the hinge pin (length and diameter) is within 20%.
The certification client shall propose the certification commission according to the principle of unit division. Multiple “models (or
Grid)" products. The same model refers to products that have no effect on the standard conformity in design.
The same product produced by the same producer and different production enterprises, or the phase produced by different producers and the same production enterprises
For products of the same model, it may be considered to carry out type tests on only one unit of sample. Products of other manufacturers/producers are required
Provide information for consistency check.
5 Certification commission
5.1 Certification process
(1) Commissioning, data review and acceptance of certification;
(2) Divide certification product units and prepare certification schemes;
(3) Signing and charging of certification contracts;
(4) Product type test;
(5) Initial factory inspection;
(6) Evaluation and approval of inspection results;
(7) Issue certifications;
(8) Post-certification supervision.
5.2 Certification commission materials
The certification client shall submit a certification request to CC AP. The materials and technical materials to be submitted for the certification request include.
(1) Application for certification;
(2) Factory inspection questionnaire;
(3) Certification documents for the certification client, producer (manufacturer), and manufacturing enterprise (factory) (first application
Please wait for changes).
a copy of business license;
b Copy of organization code certificate;
c If the principal is the seller or importer, the seller and producer, importer and
A copy of the relevant contract concluded by the applicant (first application and change);
d Agent's power of attorney (if applicable);
e For overseas certification clients, you must provide a letter of commitment to the above information and bear the corresponding legal responsibility
(Including "Three Guarantees", "Recall" and related quality responsibilities) Related certification documents.
(4) Quality system documents, including.
a Quality manual, including. organization chart and/or stipulations of responsibilities;
b The catalog of quality assurance capability control documents shall meet the relevant requirements of Appendix 1 in Annex 3;
c A copy of the obtained quality management system certification certificate (if any).
(5) The product description of automobile door locks and door holders shall meet the requirements of Annex 1;
(6) Product photos sufficient to identify the main features of the product;
(7) Assembly drawings sufficient to identify the main features of the product;
(8) Production consistency control plan (when applying for the first time and changing the production consistency control plan)
Piece 4;
(9) When entrusting other enterprises to produce automobile door locks and door retainer products, the certification client shall also submit to CC AP
Copies of relevant contracts concluded between the entrusted enterprise and the entrusted enterprise. Such as certification client, producer (manufacturing
Manufacturer), the ODM/OEM agreement, authorization letter and ODM original certification signed between the production enterprises
Printed copies (if applicable).
5.3 Certification scheme and certification contract
CC AP will review the application materials. If the application materials need to be supplemented or improved, it will communicate with the client.
Requiring additional submission of relevant materials, after the completion of the material review, a notice of acceptance or non-acceptance will be sent to the principal.
After acceptance, CC AP will formulate a certification scheme based on the evaluation results. The scheme includes.
(1) The authentication mode and unit division adopted;
(2) Type test inspection plan; (including the selection and confirmation of contracted laboratories);
(3) Factory inspection plan and time (person-day);
(4) Estimated certification costs;
(5) Other matters and requirements that need to be explained.
CC AP will notify the certification client of the above certification scheme, and after the communication is consistent, formally sign with the certification client
Make a certification contract as the basis for the implementation of this certification.
6 Certification implementation
6.1 Type test
6.1.1 Type test plan
CC AP will formulate a product inspection plan after the data review. The inspection plan includes all sample requirements for type testing and
Quantity, testing standards and testing items, information about contracted laboratories that the certification client can choose, etc.
6.1.2 Type test sample requirements
In principle, the samples of the type test shall be sent to the contracted laboratory by the certification client for testing. If necessary,
CC AP samples for testing in accordance with the requirements of the type test plan.
If there is only one model in the certification unit, send a sample of this model. When there is more than one model in the unit, CC AP will
Select a representative model among the others, and make a difference test when other models are needed.
6.1.2.1 Number of type test samples
The type test samples of door lock products are 4 sets of side door locks and 5 sets of rear door locks of the same model in the unit. Door lock including lock body
And stop. If the left and right door locks are symmetrical, they can be regarded as the same kind
The door hinge product type test samples are 2×n sets of side door hinges of the same model in the unit, and 3×n sets of rear door hinges (n is the same
The number of hinges of a door). If the left and right door hinges are symmetrical, they can be regarded as the same type.
When selecting the vehicle dynamic test or door dynamic test method, the certification client shall provide the corresponding test vehicle or vehicle
Door assembly (including door lock control manipulator).
For the number of test samples to be supervised and spot-checked and/or to be supplemented with differences, the CC AP final confirmation test plan shall prevail.
The certification client shall ensure that the submitted samples are completely consistent with the actual products, including materials, structure, and parameters
Wait.
6.1.2.2 List of key parts/raw materials and related requirements
It should be consistent with the key parts/raw materials identified in the "Production Consistency Control Plan" submitted by the enterprise. To the list
At least include the name, model, specifications and supplier of key parts (materials).
For key parts/raw materials purchased in China, the manufacturer can provide the corresponding CC AP mark recognition
Certificate.
6.1.3 Type test items and test basis
For type test items, see the applicable clauses based on the standards in Article 2 of these Rules.
If different types of products in the same unit are different in the following aspects, you need to extract the corresponding type of product to make up
Difference test.
The specific items of type test and difference test are shown in Annex 2.
6.1.4 Selection and confirmation of contracted laboratories
The certification client can choose and confirm the testing laboratory within the scope of the laboratory provided by CC AP. CC AP will
The person confirms the opinion and issues an inspection order to the contracted laboratory for sample type testing.
6.1.5 Implementation of type test
6.1.5.1 The type test is to be completed by a contract laboratory commissioned by CC AP. The contracted laboratory should follow the relevant requirements of CC AP,
Complete the sample test within the specified time, make a complete record of the entire test process and archive it to keep it, to ensure that the test process and
The record of the results is traceable.
6.1.5.2 If any test item fails, the laboratory will notify CC AP of the test failure. If the client continues
If certification is required, the rectification should be completed within 3 months and the rectification materials should be submitted to CC AP.
case. In principle, samples with the same specifications as the last unqualified test should be selected for full inspection. If the re-examination passes, the type test is passed
Otherwise, fail to pass and terminate the certification. If the rectification is not completed within the prescribed time limit and/or the sample for retesting is not submitted, the termination
This certification; the certification client can also actively terminate this certification, after completing the rectification, re-submit the certification commission and renew
Type test.
6.1.5.3 The type test time does not exceed 20 working days (calculated from the date the sample is delivered to the contracted laboratory), due to the sample
If the product or test item is not qualified, the time for the enterprise to carry out rectification and retest is not counted.
6.1.6 Type test report
After the type test, the laboratory will issue a ......
......
|