HOME   Cart(0)   Quotation   About-Us Policy PDFs Standard-List
www.ChineseStandard.net Database: 189760 (18 Oct 2025)

HJ 966.1-2018 English PDF

US$1039.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 5 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
HJ 966.1-2018: Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Farm and sideline food processing industry - Sugar manufaturing industry

HJ 966.1: Evolution and historical versions

Standard IDContents [version]USDSTEP2[PDF] delivered inStandard Title (Description)StatusPDF
HJ 966.1-2018English1039 Add to Cart 5 days [Need to translate] Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Farm and sideline food processing industry - Sugar manufaturing industry HJ 966.1-2018
HJ 966.1-2018English1039 Add to Cart 5 days [Need to translate] Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Farm and sideline food processing industry - Sugar manufaturing industry HJ 966.1-2018

PDF similar to HJ 966.1-2018


Standard similar to HJ 966.1-2018

GB 8702   HJ 630   HJ 607   HJ 966.2   HJ 622   

Basic data

Standard ID HJ 966.1-2018 (HJ966.1-2018)
Description (Translated English) Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Farm and sideline food processing industry - Sugar manufaturing industry
Sector / Industry Environmental Protection Industry Standard
Classification of Chinese Standard Z07
Word Count Estimation 26,282
Date of Issue 2018-12-25
Date of Implementation 3/1/2019
Issuing agency(ies) Ministry of Ecology and Environment

HJ 966.1-2018: Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Farm and sideline food processing industry - Sugar manufaturing industry


---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Farm and sideline food processing industry - Sugar manufaturing industry National Environmental Protection Standard of the People's Republic Technical guide for strong source of pollution Agricultural and sideline food processing industry - sugar industry Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source Intensity farm and sideline food processing industry -sugar manufaturing industry Published on.2018-12-25 2019-03-01 Implementation Ministry of Ecology and Environment released i directory Foreword...ii 1 Scope...1 2 Normative references...1 3 Terms and Definitions...2 4 source strong accounting program... 2 5 Strong source method for waste gas pollution sources...5 6 Wastewater pollution sources strong accounting method...9 7 Noise source strong accounting method...12 8 Solid waste source strength calculation method...12 9 other...13 Appendix A (informative) The results of the source calculation of the sugar industry and the list of related parameters...14 Appendix B (Informative Appendix) Pollution Rate of Waste Gas Pollutants in Sugar Industry...18 Appendix C (informative appendix) Pollution coefficient of some wastewater pollutants in the sugar industry...20 Appendix D (informative) The main equipment noise source of the sugar industry production equipment...22

Foreword

To implement the Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China, the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China Law on Prevention and Control of Gas Pollution, Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Environmental Noise Pollution, And the State Law on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Wastes, etc., improve the system of strong accounting methods for fixed sources of pollution, and guide and regulate the sugar industry. This standard is formulated for the strong accounting of pollution sources. This standard stipulates the procedures, contents, accounting methods and requirements for strong accounting of waste gas, waste water, noise and solid waste pollution sources in the sugar industry. Appendix A to Appendix D of this standard are informative annexes. This standard is the first release. This standard is formulated by the Department of Environmental Impact Assessment and Emission Management of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, and the Department of Regulations and Standards. This standard is mainly drafted by. Environmental Engineering Assessment Center of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Environmental Standards Institute of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China Light Industry Clearance Jie production center, China Sugar Association. This standard is approved by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment on December 25,.2018. This standard has been implemented since March 1,.2019. This standard is explained by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. 1 pollution source and source strong accounting technology guide agricultural and sideline food processing industry - sugar industry

1 Scope of application

This standard stipulates the procedures, contents, accounting methods and requirements for strong accounting of pollution sources in the sugar industry. This standard is applicable to the source strength accounting of new (reconstruction, expansion) construction projects and existing engineering pollution sources in the sugar industry. This standard is applicable to the strong accounting of normal and abnormal emissions of the sugar industry, and is not applicable to accidents such as sudden leakage, fire, explosion, etc. The source of the emission is calculated. This standard is applicable to the strong accounting of waste gas, waste water, noise and solid waste pollution sources in the main production equipment and public auxiliary projects of the sugar industry. The boiler source source of GB 13223 is calculated according to HJ 888, and the boiler source of GB 13271 is executed according to HJ 991. Carry out accounting. This standard does not apply to the use of waste molasses to produce alcohol, yeast and other products, as well as the use of bagasse paper, the use of bagasse and filter mud to produce fertilizer, etc. Strong accounting of pollution sources for comprehensive utilization of solid waste in sugar industry.

2 Normative references

The contents of this standard refer to the following documents or their terms. For undated references, the valid version applies to this standard. GB 9078 industrial furnace kiln air pollutant discharge standards GB 12348 industrial enterprise boundary environmental noise emission standards GB 13223 Standard for emission of atmospheric pollutants from thermal power plants GB 13271 Boiler Air Pollutant Emission Standard GB 14554 Odor Pollutant Emission Standard GB 16297 Integrated emission standards for atmospheric pollutants GB 21909 Water pollutant discharge standard for sugar industry GB 50015 Building Water Supply and Drainage Design Code GB/T 16157 Determination of particulate matter in fixed pollution source exhaust gas and sampling method of gaseous pollutants HJ 2.1 General Outline of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction Projects HJ 2.2 Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Atmospheric Environment HJ 2.3 Environmental Impact Assessment Technical Guidelines Surface Water Environment HJ 2.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Technical Guidelines Acoustic Environment HJ 75 Fixed Pollution Source Flue Gas (SO2, NOx, Particulate Matter) Emissions Continuous Monitoring Technical Specification HJ 76 Technical requirements and test methods for continuous monitoring system for stationary pollution source flue gas (SO2, NOx, particulate matter) HJ/T 91 Surface Water and Wastewater Monitoring Technical Specifications HJ/T 92 Water Pollutant Total Monitoring Technical Specification HJ/T 353 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Installation Technical Specification (Trial) HJ/T 354 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Acceptance Technical Specification (Trial) Technical Specifications for Operation and Assessment of HJ/T 355 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System (Trial) HJ/T 356 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Data Validity Discrimination Technical Specification (Trial) 2HJ/T 373 Technical Specifications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Fixed Pollution Source Monitoring (Trial) HJ/T 397 Fixed Source Exhaust Gas Monitoring Technical Specification HJ 630 Environmental Monitoring Quality Management Technical Guidelines HJ 819 General Guidelines for Self-Monitoring Technical Units of Sewage Units HJ 860.1 Application for Pollution Discharge Permit and Issuance Technical Specification for Agricultural and Sideline Food Processing Industry - Sugar Industry HJ 884 Guidelines for the Guidelines for Sources of Pollution Sources HJ 888 Pollution Source Power Accounting Technical Guide HJ 991 Pollution Source Power Accounting Technical Guide Boiler

3 Terms and definitions

The following terms and definitions defined by HJ 884 apply to this standard. 3.1 Sugar manufacturing industry Refers to all raw sugar or finished sugar (white sugar, white sugar, red sugar, yellow sugar, brown sugar) made from sugar cane, sugar beet or raw sugar. And the production of various fine granulated sugars by refining raw sugar or finished sugar as raw materials. 3.2 Abnormal discharge Refers to the discharge of pollutants under abnormal conditions in production facilities or pollution prevention (control) facilities, such as particle dryers or other production equipment In the state of starting, parking, inspection and maintenance, or other process equipment is abnormal, the pollution prevention facilities are not due to faults, inspection and maintenance, etc. It should have an abnormal situation such as governance efficiency and synchronous operation rate.

4 source strong accounting procedures

4.1 General principles The strong source accounting procedures include pollution source identification, pollutant determination, accounting method and parameter selection, source strength accounting, and accounting results. For details, see HJ 884 for details. 4.2 Identification of pollution sources The identification of pollution sources in the sugar industry should cover all places, equipment, or equipment that may generate pollutants, waste water, noise, solid waste pollutants. The source strength accounting should cover all pollutants discharged from various sources, as shown in Table 1. The identification of pollution sources shall comply with the technical guidelines for environmental impact assessment such as HJ 2.1, HJ 2.2, HJ 2.3, and HJ 2.4. 4.3 Determination of pollutants The determination of pollutants of various pollution sources in the sugar industry shall include according to GB 9078, GB 12348, GB 14554, GB 16297, GB 21909. Contaminants in national and local emission standards. Contaminants that may be produced in the production process but not included in national or local emission standards, Can be based on environmental quality standards, other industry standards, other national emission standards, local people's governments or environmental authorities 3 Improve demand and analyze and determine according to raw and auxiliary materials and fuel use and production process. 4.4 Accounting method selection 4.4.1 General principles The strong accounting methods for pollution sources of the sugar industry include the actual measurement method, the material balance algorithm, the analogy method and the pollution yield coefficient method. If you choose the priority method, if you can't use the priority method, you should give a reasonable reason. The accounting method and the order of selection are shown in Table 1. Table 1 source strength accounting method selection order table Element pollution source pollutant/accounting factor Accounting method and prioritization New (reconstruction) construction Process pollution source Existing engineering pollution Source a Organized waste Gas (normal row put) Particle dryer Sulfur dioxide Material balance algorithm 2. Analogy 3. Pollution coefficient method 1. Measurement method b 2. Material balance algorithm NOx, particulate matter, exhaust gas Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method Measure b Crystallized honey screening machine, packaging system, Granulated granulated waste gas Particle analog method Organized waste Gas (not normal emission) Particle dryer Sulfur dioxide Material balance algorithm 2. Analogy 1. Measurement method b 2. Material balance algorithm NOx, particulate matter, exhaust gas analogy method Crystallized honey screening machine, packaging system, Granulated granulated waste gas Particle analog method Unorganized waste Unloading, transfer, etc. of raw materials, fuel, ash, etc. Storage; lime and machine feed; lime kiln Feeding particulates Analogy analogy Sulfur smoldering sulfur furnace exhaust sulfur dioxide, particulate matter Integrated wastewater treatment facility, filter sludge Fermentation waste gas, bagasse pile Hydrogen sulfide, ammonia Wastewater from various production facilities, integrated wastewater Amount of wastewater Material balance algorithm 2. Analogy 3. Pollution coefficient method c 1. Measurement method b 2. Material balance algorithm Chemical oxygen demand, five-day biochemical oxygen demand, suspension Float, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method c Measure b Noise level analogy method for noise source of noise production equipment or workshops and pollution prevention facilities Solid Waste Production unit Bagasse, bagasse ash, beet mash, filter mud, stone Ash and other solid waste analogy method Integrated wastewater treatment facility sludge a The existing project pollution source has not been manually monitored according to relevant management requirements, the installation of automatic pollutant monitoring equipment or automatic monitoring equipment does not meet the requirements, the environment In the process of impact evaluation management, the pollutant discharge should be calculated according to the method in this table after the rectification is in place according to the law; in the process of sewage permit management, according to the discharge permit The regulations govern the discharge of pollutants. b When the existing project pollution sources are strongly accounted for, when there are multiple pollution sources of the same type in the same enterprise, other pollution sources can be compared with the same type of pollution sources in the enterprise. The source data accounting source is strong. c The fouling coefficient method is applicable to integrated wastewater. 44.4.2 Exhaust gas 4.4.2.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source In normal discharge, the material balance algorithm is preferred for the strong calculation of sulfur dioxide source in the organized exhaust gas, followed by the analogy method and the pollution yield coefficient method; The ratio of nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and waste gas is preferably selected by analogy method, followed by the method of yield coefficient. Organized exhaust gas in the presence of non-normal emissions The strong calculation of sulfur source is preferred by the material balance algorithm, followed by the analogy method; the ratio of nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and exhaust gas is selected. The analogy method is adopted for the strong accounting of unorganized pollutants. 4.4.2.2 Existing engineering pollution sources In normal discharge, the strong measurement of sulfur dioxide source in the organized exhaust gas is preferred by the actual measurement method, and the material balance algorithm is used when the measured condition is not available; The measurement of other pollutant sources is based on the actual measurement method. In the case of abnormal emissions, the strong calculation of the sulfur dioxide source in the organized exhaust gas is preferred by the actual measurement method. The material balance algorithm is adopted when the measured conditions are available; the actual measurement method is used for the strong accounting of other pollutant sources. When using the actual measurement method to calculate the actual emissions, such as The pollutant discharge permit of the sewage disposal unit requires the use of automatically monitored pollutants, and only valid automatic monitoring data can be used for accounting; The pollution discharge factor, such as the sewage discharge permit, does not require the use of automatic monitoring of pollution factors, the use of automatic monitoring data is preferred, followed by the use of monitoring standards. Manually monitor or entrust monitoring agencies to conduct data from monitoring. When there are multiple sources of organized exhaust gas pollution of the same enterprise, His pollution source can be compared with the measured data of the same type of organized exhaust gas pollution source of the enterprise. The analogy method is adopted for the strong accounting of unorganized pollutants. 4.4.3 Waste water 4.4.3.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source The wastewater volume of each production plant wastewater is preferably selected by the material balance algorithm, followed by the analogy method; the pollutant source source is calculated using the analogy method. Comprehensive The amount of waste water in the wastewater is preferably selected by the material balance algorithm, followed by the analogy method and the pollution yield coefficient method; the strong classification of the pollutant source is preferred by the analogy method. Secondly, the pollution coefficient method is selected. 4.4.3.2 Existing engineering pollution sources The wastewater volume of each production unit wastewater and integrated wastewater is preferably selected by the actual measurement method, followed by the material balance algorithm; Measured method. When the actual emission is calculated by the actual measurement method, if the pollutant discharge permit of the pollutant discharge unit requires the use of automatically monitored pollutants, only the pollutants may be collected. Use effective automatic monitoring data for accounting; if the sewage unit discharge permit does not require automatic monitoring of pollution factors, priority Automatically monitor data, followed by data obtained by manual monitoring or commissioning of monitoring agencies in accordance with monitoring specifications. For the same enterprise When there are many sources of wastewater pollution from the same type of production equipment, other pollution sources can be compared with the actual number of wastewater sources of the same type of production equipment in the enterprise. According to the accounting source. 4.4.4 Noise 4.4.4.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source The strong source of noise pollution is calculated by analogy. 4.4.4.2 Existing engineering pollution sources The strong source of noise pollution is measured by the actual measurement method. When there are multiple noise sources of the same type of production equipment in the same enterprise, other pollution sources 5 It can be compared with the measured data of the noise pollution source of the same type of production equipment of the enterprise. 4.4.5 Solid waste 4.4.5.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source The strong accounting of solid waste sources is based on analogy. 4.4.5.2 Existing engineering pollution sources The solid waste source is strongly calculated using the actual measurement method. 4.5 Parameter selection The engineering design data may be taken from the strong accounting parameters of the new (reconstruction, expansion) construction equipment or facility pollution source. Existing engineering production equipment or The strong accounting parameters of the facility pollution sources can take effective monitoring data during the accounting period. 4.6 Source strength accounting The emission or discharge of waste gas, waste water and solid waste is the sum of all pollution sources generated or discharged, of which the source of exhaust gas pollution is strong. Accounting should include the production or emissions of both normal and abnormal conditions. The emissions of normal emissions are organized emissions and unorganized. The sum of emissions. Calculated using equation (1).  ' DDD   (1) Where. D-- emissions of a certain pollutant during the accounting period, t; Di--the amount of pollutants produced or discharged when a pollution source is normally discharged during the accounting period, t; Di '--The occurrence or emission of a certain pollutant when a certain pollution source is abnormally discharged during the accounting period, t; N--the number of pollution sources, the quantity of dimension one. 4.7 Summary of accounting results See Appendix A for the format of the strong source accounting results.

5 Strong source method for waste gas pollution sources

5.1 Material Balance Algorithm 5.1.1 General principles The material balance algorithm is applicable to the source calculation of sulfur dioxide in the particle dryer of the sugar enterprise. 5.1.2 Sulfur dioxide production The amount of sulfur dioxide produced is calculated by the formula (2). t,ar4 SO S2 1 100 100 Sq d KB d         (2) In the formula. 2SO d -- the amount of sulfur dioxide produced during the accounting period, t; K--the amount of sulfur in the fuel that is oxidized to sulfur dioxide after combustion, the amount of dimension one; 6BS--the actual fuel consumption during the accounting period, t; q4--The heat loss of mechanical incomplete combustion, %, related to furnace type and fuel, etc., according to the technology provided by the manufacturer The value of the manufacturing parameters determined in the specification book, etc., can also be referred to Table 2 for the value; St, ar--the fuel receives the base total sulfur, %. Table 2 General values of mechanical incomplete combustion heat loss q4 scale Furnace type Q4 (%) 14MW or 20t/h and above 14MW or 20t/h and below Layer burner Chain grate furnace 5 10 Reciprocating grate furnace 7 9.5 Vibration grate furnace 5 8.5 Coal smelting grate furnace 8 11.5 Fluidized bed furnace 5, 2 (biomass) 16, 2 (biomass) Pulverized coal stove 2 3 Fuel burner 0 0 Gas stove 0 0 Note. The parameters are taken from the “Notice on Issued Calculation of Pollutant Discharge and Material Balance Method” (Proposal No. 81 of the Ministry of Environmental Protection,.2017). K depends on the combustion method, and can be determined according to the manufacturing parameters determined by the manufacturer's technical specifications, etc., and can also be referred to Table 3. Table 3 Share of sulfur in the fuel to form sulfur dioxide Furnace type Size 14MW or below 20t/h, 14MW or more Coal fired furnace Layer burner 0.825 0.85 Fluidized bed furnace (unreinforced sulfur agent) 0.775 0.80 Pulverized coal stove 0.90 0.90 Biomass furnace 0.40 0.50 Fuel (gas) furnace 1.00 1.00 Note. The parameters are taken from the “Notice on Issued Calculation of Pollutant Discharge and Material Balance Method” (Proposal No. 81 of the Ministry of Environmental Protection,.2017). 5.1.3 Organized exhaust pollutant emissions The amount of organized exhaust pollutant emissions is calculated using equation (3). D d         Collecting and removing Organized (3) Where. D is organized - the amount of organized exhaust pollutants during the accounting period, t; D--the amount of exhaust gas pollutants generated during the accounting period, t; η collection - collection efficiency of waste gas treatment facilities during the accounting period, %; η removal--efficiency of the removal of certain pollutants by the exhaust gas treatment facility during the accounting period, %. 5.2 Analogy 5.2.1 General principles The analogy method is applicable to the strong accounting of exhaust gas pollutant sources in new (reconstruction and expansion) construction projects. 75.2.2 Contaminant production The amount of waste gas pollutants generated by new (reconstruction and expansion) projects can be compared with the concentration of exhaust pollutants of existing devices that meet the following conditions at the same time. Effective measured data such as the amount of exhaust gas is accounted for. Analog conditions include. a) The raw materials and fuels are of the same type and are similar to the pollutant-related components (the difference is not more than 10%); b) the same type of excipients; c) analog production process waste gas, the production process is the same; analogous wastewater treatment facilities waste gas, wastewater treatment process is the same; d) the product type is the same; e) The analogous production volume of raw materials or products does not exceed 30%. 5.2.3 Pollutant emissions The discharge amount is calculated according to the amount of pollutants generated and the effect of pollution prevention and control facilities. The emission of organized exhaust pollutants is based on formula (3), no The emission of organized exhaust pollutants is calculated by equation (4). D d       collect Unorganized (4) Where. D is unorganized - the amount of unorganized exhaust pollutant emissions during the accounting period, t; D--the amount of exhaust gas pollutants generated during the accounting period, t; η collection - collection efficiency of waste gas treatment facilities during the accounting period, %. 5.3 Measurement method 5.3.1 General principles The actual measurement method is applicable to existing pollution sources with effective continuous automatic monitoring data or manual sampling monitoring data. 5.3.2 Using automatic monitoring data to calculate the source strength When using automatic monitoring data to calculate pollutant emissions, the automatic monitoring system and data of pollution sources must conform to HJ 75, HJ 76, HJ/T 373, HJ/T 397, HJ 630, HJ 819, sewage permit and other requirements. The source of exhaust gas pollutants is calculated by equation (5). = 10 DQ   ( ) (5) Where. D--the amount of pollutants discharged during ...

Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:

Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of HJ 966.1-2018_English be delivered?

Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate HJ 966.1-2018_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 3 ~ 5 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.

Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of HJ 966.1-2018_English with my colleagues?

Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of HJ 966.1-2018_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.

Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?

Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countries

Question 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?

Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.

Question 5: Should I purchase the latest version HJ 966.1-2018?

Answer: Yes. Unless special scenarios such as technical constraints or academic study, you should always prioritize to purchase the latest version HJ 966.1-2018 even if the enforcement date is in future. Complying with the latest version means that, by default, it also complies with all the earlier versions, technically.