|
US$854.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 8 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
GB/T 35320-2017: Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) -- Application guide
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| GB/T 35320-2017 | English | 854 |
Add to Cart
|
8 days [Need to translate]
|
Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) -- Application guide
| Valid |
GB/T 35320-2017
|
PDF similar to GB/T 35320-2017
Basic data | Standard ID | GB/T 35320-2017 (GB/T35320-2017) | | Description (Translated English) | Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) -- Application guide | | Sector / Industry | National Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | L05 | | Classification of International Standard | 03.100.40 | | Word Count Estimation | 45,470 | | Date of Issue | 2017-12-29 | | Date of Implementation | 2017-12-29 | | Quoted Standard | IEC 60050(191); IEC 60300-3-9; IEC 60812; IEC 61025; IEC 61160 | | Adopted Standard | IEC 61882-2001, IDT | | Regulation (derived from) | National Standards Announcement No. 32 of 2017 | | Issuing agency(ies) | General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China | | Summary | This standard specifies guidelines for the systematic implementation of HAZOP analysis using a specific set of guiding words defined in this document. It also gives guidance on the application and analysis steps of the HAZOP technology, including definition, preparation, analysis of conference and results reports, and follow-up measures. This standard also provides analysis report cases including HAZOP applications in different industries and industries. | GB/T 35320-2017: Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) -- Application guide---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Hazard and operability studies(HAZOP studies).Application guide
ICS 03.100.40
L05
National Standards of People's Republic of China
Hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP analysis)
Application Guide
(IEC 61882.2001, IDT)
Published on.2017-12-29
2017-12-29 Implementation
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China
China National Standardization Administration released
Directory
Preface III
Introduction IV
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms and Definitions 1
4 HAZOP Principle 2
4.1 General requirements 2
4.2 Analysis Principle 3
4.3 Design Description 5
4.3.1 General Requirements 5
4.3.2 Design Requirements and Design Intent 5
5 HAZOP Application 5
5.1 Overview 5
5.2 Relationship with other analysis tools 6
5.3 Limitations of HAZOP 6
5.4 Hazard Identification at Different Stages of the System Life Cycle 7
5.4.1 Overview 7
5.4.2 Concepts and Definitions Stage 7
5.4.3 Design and Development Phase 7
5.4.4 Manufacturing and Installation Phase 7
5.4.5 Operation and Maintenance Phase 7
5.4.6 Retirement and Disuse Phase 7
6 HAZOP analysis program 7
6.1 Startup of Analysis Program 7
6.2 Define the scope and objectives of the analysis 8
6.2.1 General requirements 8
6.2.2 Analysis Range 8
6.2.3 Analysis goal 8
6.3 Roles and responsibilities 8
6.4 Preparation 9
6.4.1 General requirements 9
6.4.2 Design Description 10
6.4.3 Guide Words and Deviations 10
6.5 Analysis 11
6.6 Document 14
6.6.1 General requirements 14
6.6.2 Recording Method 14
6.6.3 Analysis output 14
6.6.4 Reporting Requirements 14
6.6.5 Signing Document 15
6.7 Tracking and Responsibility 15
7 Audit 15
Appendix A (Informative) Report Method 16
A.1 Report Selection 16
A.2 HAZOP Worksheet 16
A.3 HAZOP Analysis Report 17
Appendix B (Informative) HAZOP Example 18
B.1 Introductory Example 18
B.2 Operating procedures 22
B.3 Automatic Train Protection System 25
B.3.1 Application 25
B.4 Application in the preparation of emergency plans 28
B.5 Piezoelectric Valve Control System 32
B.6 Oil vaporizer 36
Reference 40
Figure 1 HAZOP analysis program 3
Figure 2 HAZOP analysis program flow chart 12
Figure B.1 Simplified flowchart 18
Figure B.2 Car ATP Equipment 25
Figure B.3 Piezo valve control system 32
Figure B.4 Oil gasifier 36
Table 1 Basic guides and their meaning 4
Table 2 Leads related to time and sequence and their meaning 4
Table 3 Examples of deviations and their corresponding guides 10
Table B.1 Normative Example Node Design Diagram Head 19
Table B.2 Introductory Example HAZOP Record Table 20
Table B.3 Example of HAZOP Worksheet for Operating Procedures 23
Table B.4 Example of HAZOP Work for Automatic Train Protection System Example 26
Table B.5 Emergency Preparedness HAZOP Work Example 29
Table B.6 Piezo valve control system design intent example 33
Table B.7 Piezoelectric Valve Control System HAZOP Working Example Table 34
Table B.8 Oil Gasifier HAZOP Working Example 37
Foreword
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009.
This standard uses the translation method equivalent to IEC 61882.2001 "Hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP analysis) Application Guide."
The Chinese documents that have a consistent correspondence with the normatively cited international documents in this standard are as follows.
---GB/T 7826-2012 System Reliability Analysis Technique Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Procedure (IEC 60812.
2006, IDT)
--- GB/T 2900.13-2008 Electrotechnical terminology credibility and quality of service (IEC 60050(191)..1990, Amend.1.
1999AndAmend.2.2002, IDT)
This standard has made the following editorial changes.
--- The original international standard cited in the body of the IEC 60050 (191), but is not reflected in the normative references, now the national standard regulations
Added IEC 60050 (191) to the generic reference file;
--- In order to meet actual needs, define 3.1 to add note 2;
--- The original international standard was wrong. In Figure 1, "Documents and Tracking" changed "6.6~7" to "6.6~6.7";
--- Under the original international standard 5.4 is the suspension section, now add the number "5.4.1", followed by the content number in turn;
--- In order to comply with the requirements of the flow chart in the Chinese standard, the line segment and frame in Figure 2 a) and b) have been partially modified;
--- Under the original international standard 6.2 is the suspension section, now add the number "6.2.1", followed by the content number in turn;
--- The original international standard table B.1 has no table number, now add the table number "B.1", and then the table number is successively extended;
--- The original international standard table B.6 has no table number, now add the table number "B.6", and the subsequent table numbers are successively extended;
--- Use the English name in the responsible column in Tables B.2, B.3, B.4, B.7, and B.8 as "member A, member B, member C, member D, member
E, member F, etc. substitute.
--- In order to meet the corresponding requirements in the appendix of the standard, respectively, in the standard text of Appendix B, Table B.5, Table B.7, Table B.8, Figure B.4
Add echo content.
This standard is proposed by China Machinery Industry Federation.
This standard consists of National Standardization Technical Committee for Electrical and Electronic Reliability and Maintainability (SAC/TC24), National Industrial Process Measurement and Control
The Standardization Technical Committee (SAC/TC124) is under the joint management.
This standard was drafted by. Machinery Industry Instrumentation Institute of Integrated Technology Economics, CNOOC Security Technology Services Co., Ltd., China Stone
Oil and Natural Gas Pipeline Engineering Co., Ltd., China Institute of Safety Production Science, Beijing Joint Purkinje Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Fruit Manufacturer
Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing Huaqing Guocheng Safety Technology Co., Ltd., Institute of Industry and Information Technology, Fifth Institute of Electronics, Shanghai Black Horse Security
Moving Systems Co., Ltd.
The main drafters of this standard. Meng Zouqing, Liu Yao, Shuai Bing, Tang Bin, Zhang Wenwei, Gu Yu, Yu Wenguang, Zhou Youyi, Shi Xueling, Nie Chinese,
Zhao Jinsong, Cui Chengzhi, Zhu Ping, Liu Rui, Li Dong, Zhao Jianmin, Xiao Songqing, Wu Zongzhi, Yang Shengsong, Xu Yapeng, Sun Shu, Zhao Jundan, Wang Huaiyi,
Liu Ye, Liu Yirong, Xiong Wenze, Yang Liu, You Zebin, Shi Wei, and Li Qiujuan.
Introduction
The purpose of this standard is to describe the principles and steps of HAZOP analysis. HAZOP is a structuring for analyzing established systems
And systematized technology. Its goal is.
● Identify potential hazards in the system. These hazards may include hazards and larger impacts that are inherently related to the existing area of the system.
The danger of ringing range, for example, certain environmental hazards.
● Identification of potential operational problems in the system, in particular identifying causes of operational interference and possibly resulting in the production of substandard products
Deviation.
The important role of HAZOP analysis is to identify potential hazards and operability problems through structured and systematic methods.
It helps to determine the correct remedy.
A distinctive feature of the HAZOP analysis is an “inspection meeting” in which a multidisciplinary team is guided by the analysis team leader.
Check all relevant parts of a design or system. It uses a set of core guide words to identify deviations from system design intent. this
The goal of technology is to use systematic ways to inspire the imagination of participants to identify dangerous and operational problems. HAZOP should be considered as mining
Use an experience-based approach (such as a standard specification rather than another alternative) to improve the design to make it reasonable.
There are many different tools and techniques that can be used to identify potential hazards and operability issues such as checklists, failure modes, and impact analysis
(FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and HAZOP are all examples of this. Some methods, such as checklist methods and "what-if (if-if)"
Analysis can be used in the early stages of the system's life cycle where there is less information, or in subsequent phases where detailed analysis is not required. HAZOP analysis though
More detailed information about the evaluated system is needed, but more comprehensive information about the hazards and errors in the system design can be obtained.
The term "HAZOP" is also often associated with and referenced by other hazard identification techniques (eg, checking the tabular HAZOP, HAZOP1, or 2)
HAZOP for knowledge).
Before starting the HAZOP analysis, it should be confirmed that HAZOP is the most suitable technology for the current task (use alone or with
Combined with other technologies). In making this judgment, the purpose of the analysis, the possible severity of any consequences, the appropriateness of the details, and
The availability of relevant data and resources.
This standard has matured and provided guidance for HOZAP analysis in many industries and different systems. In some industries, there are more
Specific standards and guidelines, especially in the process industries where the technology originated, establish the preferred risk analysis method suitable for these industrial applications.
law. For details, please refer to the references in this standard.
Hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP analysis)
Application Guide
1 Scope
This standard specifies guidelines for the systematic implementation of HAZOP analysis using a specific set of guiding words defined in this document. It also gives
Provides guidance on the application and analysis steps of the HAZOP technology, including definition, preparation, analysis of meeting and results reports, and follow-up actions.
This standard also provides analysis report cases including HAZOP applications in different industries and industries.
2 Normative references
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only dated versions apply to this article
Pieces. For undated references, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to this document.
IEC 60050(191) Electrotechnical terminology-Dependability
Andqualityofservice)
IEC 60300-3-9 Reliability Management Part 3. Application Guide Section 9. Risk Analysis of Technical Systems (Dependability
management-Part 3.Applicationguide-Section9.Riskanalysisoftechnologicalsystems)
IEC 60812 System Reliability Analysis Technology Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Programs [Analysistechniquesfor
systemreliability-Procedureforfailuremodeandeffectsanalysis(FMEA)
IEC 61025 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
IEC 61160 Design Review
3 Terms and Definitions
The terms and definitions defined by IEC 60050(191) and the following apply to this document.
3.1
Characteristic characteristic
A qualitative or quantitative description of the element.
Note 1. Examples of characteristics such as pressure, temperature, voltage, etc.
Note 2. In some areas as parameters.
3.2
Design intent designintent
The range of behavior that the designer expects, or sets, of the elements and features.
3.3
Deviation from deviation
Deviations in design intent.
3.4
Element
Make up a node to identify the basic characteristics of the node.
Note. The choice of features may depend on the specific application, but the features may include features such as related substances, performed activities, used equipment, and so on. Things
Quality should be considered as a generalized substance. It should also include data and software.
|