|
US$1029.00 ยท In stock
Delivery: <= 7 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
GB/T 26610.5-2022: Guideline for implementation of risk-based inspection of pressure equipment system - Part 5: Quantitative analysis approach of failure consequence
Status: Valid GB/T 26610.5: Evolution and historical versions
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| GB/T 26610.5-2022 | English | 1029 |
Add to Cart
|
7 days [Need to translate]
|
Guideline for implementation of risk-based inspection of pressure equipment system - Part 5: Quantitative analysis approach of failure consequence
| Valid |
GB/T 26610.5-2022
|
| GB/T 26610.5-2014 | English | 1839 |
Add to Cart
|
7 days [Need to translate]
|
Guideline for implementation of risk-based inspection of pressure equipment system -- Part 5: Quantitative analysis approach of failure consequence
| Obsolete |
GB/T 26610.5-2014
|
PDF similar to GB/T 26610.5-2022
Basic data | Standard ID | GB/T 26610.5-2022 (GB/T26610.5-2022) | | Description (Translated English) | Guideline for implementation of risk-based inspection of pressure equipment system - Part 5: Quantitative analysis approach of failure consequence | | Sector / Industry | National Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | J74 | | Word Count Estimation | 53,572 | | Issuing agency(ies) | State Administration for Market Regulation, China National Standardization Administration | GB/T 26610.5-2022: Guideline for implementation of risk-based inspection of pressure equipment system - Part 5: Quantitative analysis approach of failure consequence
---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Guideline for implementation of risk-based inspection of pressure equipment system - Part 5.Quantitative analysis approach of failure consequence
ICS 23.020.30
CCSJ74
National Standards of People's Republic of China
Replacing GB/T 26610.5-2014
Implementation guide for risk-based inspection of pressure equipment systems
Part 5.Methods for quantitative analysis of failure consequences
Published on 2022-07-11
2023-02-01 Implementation
State Administration for Market Regulation
Released by the National Standardization Administration
directory
Preface I
Introduction III
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms, Definitions and Symbols 1
4 General 5
5 General principles and requirements for quantitative analysis of failure consequences 5
6 Selection of representative medium and related physical properties 7
7 Analysis and calculation of medium leakage 12
8 Calculation of the area of combustion consequences 16
9 Calculation of the area of poisoning consequences 22
10 Calculation of the area of non-toxic and non-flammable consequences 26
11 Determination of area consequences 27
12 Calculating Economic Consequences 28
Appendix A (normative) Quantitative analysis method for failure consequences of safety relief device opening 32
Appendix B (normative) Quantitative analysis method for the consequences of leakage failure of safety relief devices 35
Appendix C (Normative) Quantitative Analysis Method for Failure Consequences of Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles 38
Appendix D (normative) Quantitative analysis method for furnace tube failure consequences 40
Appendix E (normative) Principles for the selection of leakage holes and medium storage capacity 43
Appendix F (Informative) Relevant Data Sheets for Economic Consequence Analysis 45
Reference 48
foreword
This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for Standardization Work Part 1.Structure and Drafting Rules of Standardization Documents"
drafted.
This document is part 5 of GB/T 26610 "Implementation Guidelines for Risk-Based Inspection of Pressure Equipment Systems". GB/T 26610 has
The following sections were published.
--- Part 1.Basic requirements and implementation procedures;
--- Part 2.Risk-based inspection strategies;
--- Part 3.Qualitative analysis methods of risk;
--- Part 4.Quantitative analysis method of failure probability;
--- Part 5.Quantitative analysis methods for failure consequences.
This document replaces GB/T 26610.5-2014 "Implementation Guidelines for Risk-Based Inspection of Pressure Equipment Systems Part 5.Failure Consequences
Compared with GB/T 26610.5-2014, in addition to structural adjustment and editorial changes, the main technical changes are as follows.
a) A list of types of consequences characterization applicable to various types of equipment/components has been added (see Table 1);
b) The data required for the quantitative analysis of failure consequences have been changed (see 5.1, 5.1 of the.2014 edition);
c) Added the classification table of economic consequences of heat exchanger tube bundles (see Table 3);
d) The basic workflow for quantitative analysis of failure consequences has been changed from textual representation to graphic representation (see 5.5, 5.5 of the.2014 edition);
e) Changed the diameter range of leakage holes used in consequence analysis (see Table 6, Table 4 of the.2014 edition);
f) The formula for calculating the damage area of equipment that cannot spontaneously combust the continuous leakage medium has been changed, and the maximum value of the resultant area has been canceled.
For the conditions in the range of 929m2, the calculation formulas for the liquid phase and gas phase of the medium leakage are combined, and the calculation of the effective leakage rate is deleted.
formula (see 8.5.2, 8.5.2 of the.2014 edition);
g) Changed the calculation formula of equipment damage area where continuous leakage medium may spontaneously ignite, canceled the limitation of the maximum result area to
For the conditions in the range of 929m2, the calculation formulas for the liquid phase and gas phase of the medium leakage are combined, and the calculation of the effective leakage rate is deleted.
formula (see 8.5.3, 8.5.3 of the.2014 edition);
h) Changed the calculation formula for the damage area of equipment where the instantaneous leakage medium cannot spontaneously ignite, and canceled the limitation of the maximum value of the consequence area to
For the conditions in the range of 929m2, the calculation formula for the phase state of the medium leakage is liquid and gas phase, and the calculation formula for the effective leakage amount is deleted.
formula (see 8.6.2, 8.6.2 of the.2014 edition);
i) The formula for calculating the damage area of equipment that may spontaneously ignite the instantaneous leakage medium has been changed, and the maximum value of the resultant area has been cancelled
For the conditions in the range of 929m2, the calculation formula for the phase state of the medium leakage is liquid and gas phase, and the calculation formula for the effective leakage amount is deleted.
formula (see 8.6.3, 8.6.3 of the.2014 edition);
j) The constants in the formula for determining the balance factor based on auto-ignition temperature have been changed (see 8.10.1, 8.10.1 of the.2014 edition);
k) Changed the notation of parameters in the calculation of the consequence area for different toxic media (see 9.4, 9.4 of the.2014 edition);
l) Changed the formula for calculating the area of the result of hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen sulfide poisoning to reduce the complexity of the formula [see formula (44) and formula
(45), formula (55) and formula (56) of the.2014 edition];
m) The calculation method of the poisoning consequence area for the instantaneous leakage of other common (10 kinds) toxic media has been added (see 9.4.4.2);
n) The conversion factor in the calculation formula for the evaporation proportion of the leaking medium involved in the cost of environmental cleanup in the economic consequences was added (see 12.6.2.2,
2014 version 12.6.2.2);
o) Changed the safety valve to a safety relief device, and corrected the pressure in the protected equipment under the overpressure condition of the safety relief device (see appendix).
A and Appendix B, Appendix A and Appendix B of the.2014 edition);
p) Changed the correlation coefficient in the calculation formula of mild to moderate leakage rate of safety relief devices (see B.3.1.1,.2014 edition of
B.3.1.1);
q) Changed the continuous leakage time of the safety relief device with an inlet nominal diameter of DN >150 released to the atmosphere (see B.3.2.1,.2014
year edition B.3.2.1);
r) Changed the constant coefficient in the calculation formula of heat exchanger tube bundle replacement cost (costbundle) [see C.5.1 formula (C.3),.2014 edition
The C.5.1 formula (C.3)];
s) Commonly used heat exchanger tube bundle materials are added, and the cost factors for different tube bundle materials and carbon steel tube bundles are corrected (see Table C.1,
Table C.1 of the.2014 edition);
t) Added the technical content of the quantitative analysis method of furnace tube failure consequences (see Appendix D);
u) Changed the equipment damage cost of different equipment types corresponding to various leakage holes (see F.2.1, E.2.1 of the.2014 edition);
v) Changed the estimated value of downtime caused by leakage of each type of leak (see F.2.3, E.2.3 of the.2014 edition).
Please note that some content of this document may be patented. The issuing agency of this document assumes no responsibility for identifying patents.
This document is proposed and managed by the National Standardization Technical Committee for Boilers and Pressure Vessels (SAC/TC262).
This document is drafted by. China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd., China Machinery Industry Federation,
Nanjing University of Technology, Jiangsu Special Equipment Safety Supervision and Inspection Research Institute, PetroChina Co., Ltd. Refining and Chemical Branch
Company, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Daqing Oilfield Quality Safety and Environmental Protection Supervision and Evaluation Center, Sinopec Corp.
Co., Ltd. Beijing Yanshan Branch, Shanghai Special Equipment Supervision and Inspection Technology Research Institute, Ningbo Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Hangzhou Special Equipment
Various Equipment Testing Research Institute, China Petrochemical Corporation Tianjin Branch, China Petrochemical Corporation Qilu Branch.
The main drafters of this document. Xie Tiejun, Xie Guoshan, Li Wei, Hu Jiushao, Chen Wei, Cheng Wei, Li Guanghai, Yang Tiecheng, Zhao Jianping, Miao Chunsheng,
Song Xiaojiang, Jin Qiang, Luo Guanghui, Shan Hongxiang, Zhao Baocheng, Tang Xiaoying, Zhu Guorong, Li Weizhong, Li Chunshu, Qi Zhaoyue, Liu Wen, Wang Xiaomei.
This document was first published in.2014 and this is the first revision.
Introduction
Risk-based inspection (RBI) is not only a scientific and reliable inspection mode, but also includes advanced management and maintenance concepts.
The engineering application practice of RBI over the years has shown that RBI in my country's petrochemical industry can achieve long-term safe operation of production units and reduce production costs.
It has played a huge role in increasing the cost, increasing economic benefits and enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises. GB/T 26610.1 first formulated in.2011 and
GB/T 26610.2~26610.5, which was first formulated in.2014, formed my country's RBI technical standard system and ended the development of RBI in my country.
According to the history of foreign standards.
This document (GB/T 26610.5) is part 5 of GB/T 26610.The consequences of failure are necessary components that constitute the operation risk of pressure equipment.
The purpose of the analysis is to classify the potential failure consequences of pressure equipment. This document provides scientific post-failure results for the implementation of RBI projects.
The quantitative analysis method can also provide relevant reference and help for the risk-based design of pressure equipment.
Since the implementation of GB/T 26610.5-2014, a large amount of empirical data has been accumulated and needs to be absorbed and applied; economic consequences analysis
The relevant data are related to the social price level and should be updated to maintain the rationality of the analysis results;
Relevant research results have been obtained on the control methods of failure consequences of
The key technology research of the key research and development plan project "High-parameter pressure special equipment risk prevention and control and key technology research" has been completed.
Revision of GB/T 26610.5-2014.
Implementation guide for risk-based inspection of pressure equipment systems
Part 5.Methods for quantitative analysis of failure consequences
1 Scope
This document specifies a method for quantitative analysis of failure consequences during risk-based inspection (RBI) of pressure-bearing equipment systems.
This document applies to the pressure equipment system referred to in GB/T 26610.1-2022.
2 Normative references
The contents of the following documents constitute essential provisions of this document through normative references in the text. Among them, dated citations
documents, only the version corresponding to that date applies to this document; for undated references, the latest edition (including all amendments) applies to
this document.
GB/T 26610.4-2022 Implementation Guidelines for Risk-Based Inspection of Pressure Equipment Systems Part 4.Quantitative Analysis of Failure Probability
method
3 Terms, Definitions and Symbols
3.1 Terms and Definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this document.
3.1.1
economic consequencesfinancialconsequence
Economic losses due to equipment failure.
Note. Includes equipment repair or replacement costs, damage costs to other equipment in the area affected by equipment failure, media leakage, and equipment repair or replacement costs
The cost of downtime, the cost of personal injury caused by failure, and the cost of environmental cleanup.
3.1.2
area consequences areaconsequence
Consequences determined according to the size of the area affected by the equipment failure.
Note. including equipment damage area consequences and personnel injury area consequences.
3.1.3
Auto-ignition temperature auto-ignition temperature; AIT
In the absence of external flames, sparks and other sources of ignition, combustible substances will burn by themselves due to heating or self-heating and heat storage.
temperature.
3.1.4
continuous leak continuousrelease
The leakage lasts for a long time, and the leaked medium spreads in an elliptical shape.
3.1.5
instantaneous release
Rapid leakage, the leakage duration is very short, and the leaked medium spreads in the form of a single cloud or liquid pool.
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of GB/T 26610.5-2022_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate GB/T 26610.5-2022_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 4 ~ 7 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of GB/T 26610.5-2022_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of GB/T 26610.5-2022_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay. Question 5: Should I purchase the latest version GB/T 26610.5-2022?Answer: Yes. Unless special scenarios such as technical constraints or academic study, you should always prioritize to purchase the latest version GB/T 26610.5-2022 even if the enforcement date is in future. Complying with the latest version means that, by default, it also complies with all the earlier versions, technically.
|