Path: Home > GB/T > Page216 > GB/T 45838-2025

Price & Delivery

US$1489.00 · In stock · Download in 9 seconds
GB/T 45838-2025: Systems and software engineering - Process assessment - Process assessment model for software testing
Delivery: 9 seconds. True-PDF full-copy in English & invoice will be downloaded + auto-delivered via email. See step-by-step procedure
Status: Valid

Std ID	Version	USD	Buy	Deliver [PDF] in	Title (Description)
GB/T 45838-2025	English	1489	Add to Cart	8 days [Need to translate]	Systems and software engineering - Process assessment - Process assessment model for software testing

GB/T 45838-2025: Systems and software engineering - Process assessment - Process assessment model for software testing

---This is an excerpt. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.), auto-downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, can be purchased online: https://www.ChineseStandard.net/PDF.aspx/GBT45838-2025
National Standard of the People's Republic of China ICS 35.080CCS L 77 Systems and Software Engineering Process Evaluation Software Testing Process Evaluation Model Systems and software engineering-Process assessment-Process assessment model for software testing (ISO /IEC 33063.2015, Information technology-Process assessment- Process assessment model for software testing (MOD) Released on June 30, 2025 2026-01-01 implementation State Administration for Market Regulation The National Standardization Administration issued

Table of Contents

Preface Ⅲ Introduction...Ⅴ 1 Scope...1 2 Normative references 1 3 Terms and Definitions 1 4 Process Evaluation Model...2 4.1 Overview 2 4.2 Structure of the process evaluation model 3 4.3 Evaluation Indicators of Process Evaluation Model 7 4.4 Measuring Process Capability with Process Evaluation Models 9 5 Process dimensions and process performance indicators (Level 1) 10 5.1 Overview 10 5.2 Organizational Test Process Group 10 5.3 Test Management Process Group 11 5.4 Dynamic Testing Process Group 15 6 Capability Dimensions and Process Capability Indicators (Levels 1 to 5) 19 6.1 Overview 19 6.2 Process capability levels and process attributes 19 Appendix A (Informative) Comparison of this document with ISO /IEC 33063.2015 structure numbers 35 Appendix B (Informative) Work Product Characteristics 37 B.1 Overview 37 B.2 Common Work Products 37 B.3 Generic and Specific Work Products 40 Appendix C (Informative) Additional Processes for the Static Test Process Group 50 C.1 STAT.1 Software Review Process 50 C.2 STAT.2 Static Analysis Process 51 Appendix D (Informative) Assessment Guidelines 53 D.1 General Assessment Guidelines 53 D.2 Process Application Guidelines 53 D.3 Using Other Additional Process Guidelines 55 Appendix E (Informative) Management Support Processes 56 E.1 Overview 56 E.2 Organizational Test Process Group 56 E.3 Test Management Process Group 57 Appendix F (Informative) Guidelines for Process Capability Measurement 60 F.1 Rating and Summarizing Process Attributes 60 F.2 Process Capability Level Model 60 Appendix G (Informative) Differences between ISO /IEC /IEEE 29119-2.2021 and GB/T 38634.2-2020 62 References 64 Preface This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for standardization work Part 1.Structure and drafting rules for standardization documents" Drafting is required. This document is modified to adopt ISO /IEC 33063.2015 "Information technology process evaluation - Software testing process evaluation model". Compared with ISO /IEC 33063.2015, this document has many structural adjustments. See Appendix A for a list. The technical differences between this document and ISO /IEC 33063.2015 and their reasons are as follows. a) The normative references GB/T 38634.1 and GB/T 38634.2 replace ISO /IEC /IEEE 29119-1 and ISO / IEC /IEEE 29119-2 (see Chapters 3 and 4) for the convenience of readers; b) Added terms to help users better understand this document (see 3.1 to 3.12); c) Deleted the source of STAT.1 "ISO /IEC 12207" and the source of STAT.2 in Table 4 of ISO /IEC 33063.2015. "ISO /IEC CD1 29119-2.2011", because the latest versions of ISO /IEC 12207 and ISO /IEC 29119-2 There is no software review process (STAT.1) and static analysis process (STAT.2); d) Deleted the additional skills development process (OT.2), problem solving management process in 4.2.2 of ISO /IEC 33063.2015. (TM.4), measurement process (TM.5) and software review process (STAT.1) are from ISO /IEC 12207 PRM, while static The analytical process (STAT.2) is based on the definition of the previous version of PRM." The reason is that the latest version of ISO /IEC 12207 The process is no longer described in the ISO /IEC /IEEE 29119-2 standard; e) The process assessment model established in this document has been modified to meet ISO /IEC 33002, ISO /IEC 33003, ISO /IEC 33004 The content of the relevant requirements (see Chapter 1, 4.1, 4.2.1, 4.4, 6.2.1, B.1.2, C.1, C.3) is based on the assessment established in this document. Models and guidelines can be used independently by users to evaluate the test process if they substantially meet the requirements of the above standards. The changes will help users understand this document and improve the efficiency of the assessment process. The following editorial changes have been made to this document. a) Change the name of the standard to "System and Software Engineering Process Evaluation Software Testing Process Evaluation Model"; b) Summarize the contents of Chapter 4 and remove any repetitive content; c) Changed the title of Table 3 in ISO /IEC 33063.2015 to “Dynamic test process group” The reason is that Table 3 involves the static test process group; d) Change “TM.2.BP4” in 5.3.3 of ISO /IEC 33063.2015 to “TM.3.BP4”. The reason is that 5.3.3 Process Standard Identified as "TM.3"; e) In ISO /IEC 33063.2015, the name of "4.01" in the table "Work Products" in 5.3.1 is changed to "Organizational Test Policy". The name of "4.02" was changed to "Organizational Test Strategy"; f) The “Results” in No. 3.08 of the table “Work Products” in 5.3.1 of ISO /IEC 33063.2015 has been changed. The reason is that In a table, the “process results” of TM.1 only have a), b), c), d), e), f), g), h), but no i), j), k), l), m), so delete Except i), j), k), l), m in “Results” of No. 3.08); g) In ISO /IEC 33063.2015, “5.00 Records” in 6.2.3.3 and 6.2.5.1.3 is changed to “9.00 Records” and “9.00 The order of "5.00 Record" and "8.00 Specifications" is changed because the contents of the second-level items under "5.00 Record" are all the same as those in "9.00 Record". work products; h) Added table numbers, table titles and introductory words (see Chapter 5, Chapter 6, Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix D); i) Add item numbers and titles to the suspended sections, combining the generic practices, generic resources, and generic work products for each process attribute into a table (see Chapter 6); j) Delete the work product outputs "6.04 Incident Report" and "6.07 Static Analysis Completion Report" in Table D.4; k) Add informative Appendices E, F, and G. Appendix E is used to guide users in carrying out test process capability measurement activities; l) Deleted the informative Annex A “Conformity assessment model for processes” of ISO /IEC 33063.2015. Please note that some of the contents of this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document does not assume the responsibility for identifying patents. This document was proposed and coordinated by the National Information Technology Standardization Committee (SAC/TC 28). This document was drafted by. Beijing Software Product Quality Inspection and Testing Center Co., Ltd., China Electronics Technology Standardization Institute, China Electronics Standardization Administration, National Accreditation Center for Quality Assessment, Shanghai Computer Software Technology Development Center, China Academy of Space Systems Science and Engineering, Dopu Information Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing Software Evaluation Center Co., Ltd., Zhuhai Southern Software Network Evaluation Center, Inspur General Software Co., Ltd., Hunan Yunjian Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai Yiruan Testing Technology Co., Ltd., China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation No. 716 Research Institute, Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing Software and Information Service Exchange Co., Ltd., Shanghai Tongsiting Software Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Kaifa Source Internet Security Technology Co., Ltd., Inspur Software Technology Co., Ltd., Shandong Zhengzhong Information Technology Co., Ltd., Lenovo (Beijing) Co., Ltd., CSIC Lingjiu Electronics (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., the 304th Institute of the Third Academy of China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation, Shandong Chuangen Information Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Guqi Data Technology Co., Ltd., Microsatellite Innovation Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China Testing and Certification Group Co., Ltd., Inspur Software Group Co., Ltd., Guangdong Tuosi Software Science Park Co., Ltd., China Electronics Technology Group Corporation Second Research Institute, Nanjing Zhengfeng Information Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Chuangjing Information Technology Co., Ltd., Shandong Shanke Digital Economy Research Institute Co., Ltd., Southwest Computer Co., Ltd., China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing University, Beijing Shenzhou Aerospace Software Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong Science and Technology Infrastructure Platform Center, Guangzhou Panyu Vocational and Technical College, Hubei Optical Valley Standard Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Institute, Shanghai Xuanyi Technology Co., Ltd., China Civil Aviation Information Network Co., Ltd., China The 10th Research Institute of the Electronic Technology Group Corporation, Zhongzheng Credit Rating (Shenzhen) Technology Service Co., Ltd., Beijing University of Technology, Hangzhou Yousheng Technology Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., Changxia Digital Energy Technology (Hubei) Co., Ltd., Xiamen Civil Aviation Kaiya Co., Ltd., Beijing Honghu Yuntu Technology Co., Ltd. China Unicom Online Information Technology Co., Ltd., Qiming Information Technology Co., Ltd., Zhongguancun Space Information Industry Technology Alliance, Hebei Zhong Cheshuzhi Technology Co., Ltd. The main drafters of this document are. Lou Li, Zhang Yangyang, Li Yanjun, Fudepeng, Hao Lin, Wang Wei, Shen Ying, Zhou Donghong, Liu Mengyun, Ding Xiaoming, Yang Mengpei, Li Wenpeng, Su Wei, Wang Zaijiong, Zhou Fei, Huang Xiaofang, Xie Jing, Fei Qi, Xue Jingfeng, Zhao Longtang, Li Xing, Lu Yunfeng, Zhang Yaxin, Zhou Zhenyi, Wang Jie, Su Yuling, Ren Qiang, Guo Yiping, Qu Tianrun, Zhang Haibo, Ruan Lecheng, Zhang Jingui, Wang Yatao, Zhu Jiabing, Hu Shengwang, Chang Liang, Ling Jilai, Zhou Mingle, Feng Bo, Chao Jingjian, Fang Chunrong, Chen Boshen, Long Lianghua, Zhao Juxue, Gu Xin, Guo Zhenkai, Zhang Wenpeng, Zhou Xiangwei, Feng Fei, Lao Ji, Liu Xiaojian, Yu Xiaoyu, Hu Yun, Hu Ming, Xu Jing, Wu Bangmei, Huang Zhaosen, Kan Baoli, Song Hongbo, Yang Peng, Chen Zhenyu, Xie Bin, Wang Weidong, Hu Daqiang, Jiang Kun, Wang Chunkai, Zhifei, Ding Yadong, Yi Chunhuan, Ma Guanghao, Bai Jinyuan.

introduction

Software testing runs through all stages of the software development life cycle. In addition to software testing technology, a good and mature software testing The software testing process can maximize the effectiveness of software testing and thus ensure the quality of software products. Providing the required information for software testing is an important factor affecting the effectiveness of software testing. This document establishes a software testing process evaluation model that defines and provides evaluation indicators from two dimensions. process and capability. It is applicable to Evaluate each software testing process at the organizational level, test management level, and dynamic test level. Effectively evaluate the level that can be achieved during the component testing process and apply it to the entire project, different test stages, and Segments, test levels or test types can be used flexibly according to different user needs. After analysis and optimization, the test can be continuously improved. process, thereby better guiding the development of software testing work, which will fundamentally improve the quality of software products and promote the development of the software industry Rapid development. Systems and Software Engineering Process Evaluation Software Testing Process Evaluation Model

1 Scope

This document establishes a software testing process evaluation model and provides a framework for explaining the purpose and results of the testing process, as well as the process attributes. Provide guidance on the definition, selection and use of evaluation indicators through examples. This document is applicable for selecting models and associated documented process methods for assessment (for capability definition or process improvement). 2 Normative references The contents of the following documents constitute the essential clauses of this document through normative references in this document. For referenced documents without a date, only the version corresponding to that date applies to this document; for referenced documents without a date, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to This document. GB/T 38634.1 Systems and Software Engineering Software Testing Part 1.Concepts and Definitions (GB/T 38634.1-2020, ISO /IEC /IEEE 29119⁃1.2013, MOD) GB/T 38634.2 Systems and Software Engineering Software Testing Part 2.Test Process (GB/T 38634.2-2020, ISO / IEC /IEEE 29119⁃2.2013, MOD) ISO /IEC 33020 Information technology process assessment - Process measurement framework for process capability assessment Process assessment-Process measurement framework for assessment of process capability) 3 Terms and Definitions The terms and definitions defined in GB/T 38634.1 and GB/T 38634.2 and the following apply to this document. 3.1 process improvement Measures taken to meet the needs of the business and stakeholders and to improve the quality of the organization's processes. [Source. ISO /IEC 33001.2015, 3.1.7] 3.2 process assessment Conduct standardized evaluation of organizational unit processes based on the process evaluation model. [Source. ISO /IEC 33001.2015, 3.2.15] 3.3 assessment indicator Objective sources of evidence used to support evaluators' judgments in rating process attributes. NOTE. For example, practice, work product, or resource. [Source. ISO /IEC 33001.2015, 3.3.1, modified] 3.4 basic practice Ongoing activities to achieve a specific process objective. [Source. ISO /IEC 33001.2015, 3.3.2] ...