|
US$229.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 3 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
SN/T 1492-2015: Standard practice for laboratory bias evaluation using single test result from standard material
Status: Valid SN/T 1492: Evolution and historical versions
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| SN/T 1492-2015 | English | 229 |
Add to Cart
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
Standard practice for laboratory bias evaluation using single test result from standard material
| Valid |
SN/T 1492-2015
|
| SN/T 1492-2004 | English | 359 |
Add to Cart
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
Deviation of a single test result evaluation laboratory using standard materials
| Obsolete |
SN/T 1492-2004
|
PDF similar to SN/T 1492-2015
Standard similar to SN/T 1492-2015 GB/T 2828.1 GB/T 2828.2 GB/T 2829 Basic data | Standard ID | SN/T 1492-2015 (SN/T1492-2015) | | Description (Translated English) | Standard practice for laboratory bias evaluation using single test result from standard material | | Sector / Industry | Commodity Inspection Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | A41 | | Classification of International Standard | 03.120.30 | | Word Count Estimation | 10,127 | | Date of Issue | 2015-05-26 | | Date of Implementation | 2016-01-01 | | Older Standard (superseded by this standard) | SN/T 1492-2004 | | Quoted Standard | GB/T 5487; GB/T 6379.1; GB/T 27407; JJF 1001 | | Regulation (derived from) | State Quality-Inspection-accreditation [2015] No.224 | | Issuing agency(ies) | General Administration of Customs | | Summary | This standard specifies the difference between the results of one test to its standard value (ARV) between the assessment of the verification standard (CS) material and to determine the corresponding acceptable tolerance range, estimates a single test result falls outside the tolerance interval probability methods. Laboratory test method is applicable to the continuity of the numerical results produced biased determine whether not apply in the field of precision or repeatability conditions, to obtain an evaluation by a plurality of test results with a CS material. | SN/T 1492-2015: Standard practice for laboratory bias evaluation using single test result from standard material
---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
(Assessment method of a single standard material laboratory test results)
People's Republic of China Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Standards
Instead of the SN/T 1492-2004
Single standard material test results of the assessment
Laboratory method bias
Issued on. 2015-05-26
2016-01-01 implementation
People's Republic of China
The State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine released
Foreword
This standard was drafted in accordance with GB/T 1.1-2009 given rules.
Instead of the standard SN/T 1492-2004 "standard material deviation from a single test result evaluation laboratory method."
This standard compared with SN/T 1492-2004, the main changes are as follows.
--- Modify the standard name, "Deviation" to "bias";
--- Modify the Normative references cited in the standard;
--- An increase of some terms and definitions;
--- Increase the significance and use of the basic needs of the chapter;
--- Increased by 6.7, 6.8;
--- Remove the result of the determination, the part is incorporated Procedure 6.13,6.14,6.15;
--- Added Appendix A in A.4.1, A.4.7, A.4.8, A.4.9.
The standard reference used by the US ASTMD6617-08 standards.
This standard is proposed and managed by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee.
This standard was drafted. People's Republic of China Liaoning Province Exit Inspection and Quarantine.
The main drafters of this standard. Wu Jianguo, Zhou Chuan, Zhang Ying Yan, Chen Wei.
This standard replaces the standards previously issued as follows.
--- SN/T 1492-2004.
Introduction
Because of the inherent imprecision in all test methods, the laboratory when performing the verification standard (CS) materials testing, can not of
Hope to get the test results are equivalent to the acceptance of the reference value (ARV) of. If the test results can be reasonably close to ARV value, you can guarantee real
Laboratory testing methods perform operations no bias, or that although bias can be considered negligible disregarded. Hypothesis testing results
ARV of the difference exceeds a predetermined amount, the laboratory is necessary to take corresponding measures.
This can be used for standard laboratory, when the CS or CCS test material, according to the combined uncertainty ε and the expected first Ⅰ
Error class to establish its acceptable tolerance range, in order to ensure the implementation of test methods without bias. This standard is based on the tolerance interval set,
To properly assess the effectiveness of different bias amount detection, investigation detection capability of true bias. And further depending on the desired category Ⅰ errors
Bias detection capability to meet specific business needs. CS testing activities described in this standard, internal quality control laboratory is a party
--- MR statistical method combined dynamic tracking supplementary monitoring technology.
This standard assumes that the measured system in a controlled state statistics, we can use a normal (Gaussian) distribution to describe and predict.
Single standard material test results of the assessment
Laboratory method bias
1 Scope
This standard specifies the difference between the results of one test to its standard value (ARV) between the assessment of the verification standard (CS) material and determine the appropriate
Acceptable tolerance interval estimate single test result falls outside the tolerance interval probability methods.
Laboratory test method is applicable to the continuous generation of numerical results determining the presence or absence of bias, does not apply to on-site or precision
Under the same condition to obtain an evaluation by a plurality of test results with a CS material.
2 Normative references
The following documents for the application of this document is essential. For dated references, only the dated version suitable for use herein
Member. For undated references, the latest edition (including any amendments) applies to this document.
GB/T 5487 Determination of gasoline octane number (research)
GB/T 6379.1 measurement methods and results of Accuracy (trueness and precision) - Part 1. General principles and definitions
GB/T 27407 laboratory quality control use performance statistics for quality assurance and control chart technical evaluation and analysis of the measurement system
JJF1001 common measurement terms and definitions
3 Terms and Definitions
JJF1001 define the following terms and definitions apply to this document.
3.1
Accepted reference value acceptedreferencevalue; ARV
Agreed upon for comparison standard value, it comes from.
a) based on scientific principles or theoretical values determined value;
b) certification based on the specified value or values of experimental work in some countries and international organizations;
c) based on scientific or engineering organizations agree experimental work under the auspices of the value or the value of certification;
d) When a), b), c) can not be obtained, then use (measurable) amount of expectation, which provides that measures the overall average.
[GB/T 6379.1-2004, the definition 3.5]
3.2
Accepted tolerance interval acceptabletolerancezone
Limited to 0 ± kε (k value determined in accordance with Class Ⅰ error probability selected by the user, ε value see 3.9). If the test method of
CS single difference between the results of its ARV falls within the interval, the laboratory or testing organization to perform the test method of operating an unbiased
Make assumptions be accepted, the difference can be regarded as normal random testing methods contribute fluctuations. On the contrary, the difference falls within the range, the assumptions made
Not be accepted.
3.3
Verification standard checkstandard; CS
Quality control measurements with standard reference material values.
Note. This material is reference material, interlaboratory comparison or reference values assigned to the material used to determine the accuracy of the measurement system.
[GB/T 27407-2010, the definition 3.1.14]
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of SN/T 1492-2015_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate SN/T 1492-2015_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of SN/T 1492-2015_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of SN/T 1492-2015_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay. Question 5: Should I purchase the latest version SN/T 1492-2015?Answer: Yes. Unless special scenarios such as technical constraints or academic study, you should always prioritize to purchase the latest version SN/T 1492-2015 even if the enforcement date is in future. Complying with the latest version means that, by default, it also complies with all the earlier versions, technically.
|