US$199.00 · In stock Delivery: <= 3 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email. GBZ59-2024: (Diagnostic criteria for occupational toxic liver disease) Status: Valid GBZ59: Evolution and historical versions
Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
GBZ 59-2024 | English | 199 |
Add to Cart
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
(Diagnostic criteria for occupational toxic liver disease)
| Valid |
GBZ 59-2024
|
GBZ 59-2010 | English | 329 |
Add to Cart
|
3 days [Need to translate]
|
Diagnostic criteria of occupational toxic hepatopathy
| Valid |
GBZ 59-2010
|
GBZ 59-2002 | English | 639 |
Add to Cart
|
5 days [Need to translate]
|
Diagnostic Criteria of Occupational Toxic Hepatopathy
| Obsolete |
GBZ 59-2002
|
Standard similar to GBZ59-2024 GB/T 50082 GBZ 234 GBZ 59
Basic data Standard ID | GBZ 59-2024 (GBZ59-2024) | Description (Translated English) | (Diagnostic criteria for occupational toxic liver disease) | Sector / Industry | National Standard | Word Count Estimation | 9,916 | Date of Issue | 2024-03-11 | Date of Implementation | 2025-03-01 | Issuing agency(ies) | State Administration for Market Regulation, China National Standardization Administration |
GBZ59-2002: Diagnostic Criteria of Occupational Toxic Hepatopathy---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Diagnostic Criteria of Occupational Toxic Hepatopathy
ICS 13.100
C60
GBZ
People's Republic of China National Occupational Health Standards
Diagnostic criteria for occupational toxic liver disease
Released in.2002-04-08
2002-06-01 Implementation
Issued by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China
Foreword
Article 5.1 of this standard is recommended and the remainder is mandatory.
According to the "People's Republic of China Occupational Disease Prevention Law" to develop this standard. Since the implementation of the standard date, the original standard
GB 16379-1996 inconsistent with this standard, subject to this standard.
A variety of occupational activities, a short period of time exposure to a large number of chemical substances can cause toxic liver disease. For the protection of contacts
Physical health, effective prevention and treatment of occupational acute toxic liver disease, according to recent clinical and laboratory research progress, the development of this standard.
Appendix A, C, D, E, F, G, H are normative appendices in Appendix A to this standard.
This standard is proposed and centralized by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China.
This standard by the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Zhongshan Medical University School of Public Health is responsible for drafting, Shanghai infectious diseases
Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Dalian Institute of Labor Hygiene, Jilin Province Occupational Disease Prevention and Control
, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Datong City Occupational Disease Control Center, Shanghai Yangpu District
Heart Hospital, Shenyang City Institute of Occupational Health and Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Hunan Medical University Department of Preventive Medicine occupational disease group, Anhui Province
Animal health occupational disease prevention and control research institute, Huainan City Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Institute, Zhejiang Province, occupational health and occupational disease prevention and control of the Institute
grass.
This standard is interpreted by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China.
Diagnostic criteria for occupational toxic liver disease
Occupational Toxicity Liver disease is a toxic liver disease caused by the absorption of chemical poisons in occupational exposure.
1 Scope
This standard specifies the diagnostic criteria and principles of occupational toxic liver disease.
This standard applies to a variety of chemical poison caused by occupational acute, chronic toxic liver disease diagnosis.
2 diagnostic principles
According to the history of occupational exposure, the exact clinical manifestations of liver disease, laboratory tests, combined with on-site hygiene and epidemiological survey,
As well as dynamic observation of information, comprehensive analysis, do a good job of differential diagnosis, to determine the liver disease caused by the chemical poisoning caused by contact,
Can be diagnosed. Such as the simultaneous occurrence of pathogens caused by other system damage performance, the etiology of diagnosis has important reference value.
3 observation object
Liver poison operators have dizziness, fatigue, loss of appetite or liver pain and other symptoms; liver enlargement, soft or soft
Toughness, tenderness; screening liver function test (see Appendix D5.2) or re-screening liver function test (see Appendix D5.3) abnormal.
Diagnostic and grading standards
4.1 acute toxic liver disease
4.1.1 acute mild toxic liver disease
In the shorter term to absorb a higher concentration of liver poison, the following performance of the two can be diagnosed as acute mild toxicity
Liver disease.
a) have fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, liver pain and other symptoms;
b) liver enlargement, soft, tenderness, may be associated with mild jaundice;
c) acute toxic liver disease routine liver function test abnormalities.
4.1.2 acute moderate toxic liver disease
There are obvious fatigue, apathetic, anorexia, tired of oil, nausea, abdominal distension, liver pain, liver swelling, tenderness
Obviously, acute toxic liver disease routine liver function test abnormalities, accompanied by one of the following manifestations, can be diagnosed as acute moderate
Toxic liver disease.
a) moderate jaundice;
b) spleen enlargement;
c) the course of disease in more than four weeks.
4.1.3 acute severe toxic liver disease
In the above clinical manifestations, based on one of the following circumstances, can be diagnosed with acute severe toxic liver disease.
a) hepatic encephalopathy;
b) obvious jaundice;
c) Ascites;
d) hepatorenal syndrome;
e) prothrombin time prolonged more than twice the normal value, accompanied by bleeding tendency.
4.2 chronic toxic liver disease
4.2.1 Chronic mildly toxic liver disease
There is fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, abdominal fullness or liver pain and other symptoms; liver enlargement, soft or flexible, there are
Tenderness, chronic toxic liver disease screening liver function test or re-screening liver function test abnormalities.
4.2.2 chronic moderate toxic liver disease
Those who have one of the following manifestations can be diagnosed with chronic moderate to moderate toxic liver disease.
a) the above symptoms are more serious, the liver has gradually slow swelling or texture hardening trend, accompanied by significant tenderness;
b) fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms more obvious, serum transaminase activity, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase or γ-globulin and other repeated
Often or continuously;
c) with chronic mild toxic liver disease clinical manifestations, accompanied by splenomegaly.
4.2.3 chronic severe toxic liver disease
In the case of chronic moderate toxic liver disease, one of the following manifestations can be diagnosed as chronic severe toxic liver
disease;
a) cirrhosis;
b) with more obvious kidney damage;
c) serum albumin continued to decrease.
5 Principles of handling
5.1 Principles of treatment
5.1.1 acute toxic liver disease
a) cause of treatment
Early cause of the treatment, such as the application of complexing agents, special effects antidote or blood purification therapy.
b) symptomatic and supportive care
Bed rest, given rich in vitamins, digestible light diet; intravenous or intravenous infusion of glucose, vitamin C, etc .;
Appropriate use of Chinese and Western medicine for the treatment of acute liver disease; for other physical and other system damage, to other reasonable treatment
Treatment.
c) acute severe toxic liver disease
The focus is on liver damage for treatment, prevention and treatment of complications, to take appropriate positive measures to block liver cell necrosis,
Promote liver cell regeneration, for early recovery; can be applied glucocorticoid, according to the disease in a timely manner to adjust the dose and treatment, tight
Observation, prevention of various side effects, with particular attention to upper gastrointestinal bleeding; other treatment can refer to the treatment of fulminant hepatic failure
Program.
5.1.2 chronic toxic liver disease
a) once diagnosed, should be rest, as far as possible hospitalization;
b) according to the disease to develop treatment programs, early to rest, the condition improved, the appropriate activities, and gradually restored
Regular life rules; should be easy to digest the diet, to ensure the necessary nutrition; prohibited drinking, banned can cause liver
Damaged drugs;
c) symptomatic and supportive care is very important, appropriate, Western medicine treatment, to avoid abuse;
d) Pharmacopoeia special effects drug treatment indications, according to the disease in a planned application.
5.2 Other processing
5.2.1 acute mild toxic liver disease cure, the general should be temporarily transferred from the original work; acute moderate toxic liver disease cured,
Generally should not engage in liver toxic operations; acute severe toxic liver disease cure, should not engage in toxic operations.
5.2.2 after the acute phase is still obvious symptoms or liver function test is not restored, according to the condition, to rest and treatment, and
Do follow-up work.
5.2.3 chronic toxic liver disease observed every 2 to 3 months, if necessary, do re-screening liver function test or other seizure
Check, should be clear as soon as possible. The necessary treatment can be given during the observation period.
5.2.4 chronic mild toxic liver disease cured, the general should be transferred from the liver poison operations.
5.2.5 chronic moderate toxic liver disease cured, the general should be transferred from toxic and hazardous operations.
5.2.6 chronic severe toxic liver disease, should be more long-term rest, after treatment and rest, such as the condition improved significantly, health
Conditions permit, may be appropriate to participate in non-exposure to harmful factors of light work.
6 Correct use of the description of this standard
See Appendix A (informative), Appendix B, C, D, E, F, H (normative).
Appendix A
(Informative)
Correctly use the instructions in this standard
A.1 This standard applies to occupational toxicity caused by chemical poisoning, chronic toxic liver disease.
A.2 Occupational acute toxic liver disease can occur in cases of poisoning with other systems or organs as the main target organ.
Can delay in the course of disease, should pay attention. Occupational chronic toxic liver disease onset insidious, slow course. Planned
Dynamic observation, a clear diagnosis of great significance, it is listed as the object of observation, but the observation object does not belong to the level of poisoning diagnosis should be
To be clear.
A.3 acute toxic liver disease diagnostic criteria, mild jaundice refers to serum bilirubin above normal, but less than 51.3 μmol
/ L (3 mg/dL), moderate jaundice refers to the total serum bilirubin in 51.3 ~ 85.5 μmol/L (3 ~ 5 mg/dL)
Significant jaundice refers to serum total bilirubin at 85.5 μmol/L or more.
A.4 In view of the high prevalence of viral hepatitis in some areas of our country, it will be differentiated from the differential diagnosis of viral hepatitis.
Appendix C. In addition should consider the possibility of cross-effects of two kinds of etiology, clinical analysis should be a comprehensive conclusion, do not just
Hepatitis B serum markers positive, that is, the possibility of excluding toxic liver disease.
A.5 in clinical work, the occupational acute toxic liver disease misdiagnosed as acute viral hepatitis is quite common, should cause Note
meaning.
A.6 Application of type A or B ultrasound examination of the liver, mainly to determine the size of the liver, but the inspection specifications and the results
Of the clinical evaluation, there is no consensus, to be further explored. So this standard is not included as a diagnostic indicator. Due to ultrasound
Wave examination and clinical examination can be complementary enough, dynamic observation more meaningful, so in clinical work can refer to the application.
A.7 Liver biopsy Tissue examination is the most direct way to identify liver lesions, under the guidance of ultrasound, percutaneous
Liver puncture biopsy, is safe and reliable, but in general, difficult for occupational poisoning patients to accept, and toxic
Liver disease histopathological diagnostic criteria to be developed, it is not included in this standard. Clinically, if necessary, according to specific
Situation, carry out this inspection.
A.8 Because of the current objective of the liver damage indicators are not sensitive enough, so the development of cure standards are not yet mature. For labor
Dynamic ability to identify the need to develop clinical reference criteria for cure, for reference.
Occupational acute toxic liver disease course more than six months, according to chronic toxic liver disease treatment.
A.8.1 Occupational acute toxic liver disease clinical cure criteria.
a) the main symptoms disappear or disappear;
b) enlargement of the liver back to normal or retraction, texture becomes soft;
c) no significant tenderness or percussion pain in the liver;
d) liver function test returned to normal;
e) poison caused other system damage to basic recovery.
A.8.2 Occupational chronic toxic liver disease clinical basic cure criteria.
a) the main symptoms disappear or disappear;
b) liver enlargement or stability of the same, no significant changes in texture, no significant tenderness or percussion pain;
c) liver function test returned to normal;
d) health condition improved;
e) The above conditions remain stable for more than one year.
A.9 The pathogens of the disease such as the development of poisoning diagnostic criteria, the disease diagnosis, classification should be the diagnostic criteria for the species
Basis, which the diagnosis of liver damage, grading, can refer to this standard.
Appendix B
(Normative appendix)
Definition and extent of liver poison
B.1 Definition of liver poison
Liver poisoning is called a variety of chemical poisons with one of the main target organs or major target organs.
B.2 common varieties
According to domestic information, common liver poisoning are.
B.2.1 metals, metals and their compounds yellow phosphorus, phosphine, arsenic trioxide, arsine, thallium, lead, antimony, ten
Borane and the like.
B.2.2 Halogenated carbon tetrachloride, trichloromethane, dichloroethane, trichloroethane, tetrachloroethane, vinyl chloride, trichloroethyl
Olefins, tetrachlorethylene, chloroprene, polychlorinated biphenyls, and the like.
B.2.3 Aromatic amino and nitro compounds Aniline, toluidine, chloroaniline, methoxyaniline (aminoanisole), B
Oxyaniline (aminophenylethyl ether), xylylamine, nitrobenzene, dinitrobenzene, trinitrobenzene, trinitrotoluene, nitrochloride
Benzene, dinitrochlorobenzene, nitroaniline, 2,4,6-trinitro-methylnaphthalamide (special quite children) and so on.
B.2.4 Other ethanol, chloroethanol, pentachlorophenol, hydrazine, l, 1-dimethylhydrazine, dimethylformamide, organophosphorus pesticide,
Organochlorine pesticides and so on.
B.2.5 With the development of industrial and agricultural production, the above varieties will continue to add.
B.3 Liver Toxicity
The toxicity of various liver toxicities and the severity of toxic liver disease by exposure dose, manner, whether the joint
And the influence of various individual factors are different, in the diagnosis should be the overall view of the full consideration.
Appendix C.
(Normative appendix)
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis points
C.1 Diagnostic points
C.1.1 acute toxic liver disease diagnosis points
a) Obtain etiology data based on occupational exposure history, field survey, epidemiological history and biological monitoring;
b) comprehensive analysis of symptoms, signs, liver function tests, and other necessary checks, access to acute liver disease
in accordance with;
c) to explore whether liver disease is caused by toxicants. exposure to toxic time and incidence, the role of toxic substances and clinical
Performance, may absorb the dose and severity of the three areas are consistent. Such as the basic match and do a good job of differential diagnosis, diagnosis
Can be initially clear; if not inconsistent, according to the specific circumstances, further inspection and close observation, with a view to a clear diagnosis.
C.1.2 chronic toxic liver disease diagnosis points
The disease onset insidious, progress is slow, still lack of sensitive, specific diagnostic indicators, alone a clinical examination, often difficult
To conclude the diagnosis, so for liver poison operators, health care must be carried out to obtain after exposure to poison
Clinical manifestations of the situation year after year to provide a more complete and comprehensive information, is the main basis for a clear diagnosis.
The main idea of diagnosis is. '
a) based on symptoms, signs, liver function tests and other checks and other dynamic observation results to determine the liver lesions;
b) the use of professional contact with all the information, comprehensive analysis to determine the relationship between liver disease and toxic contact, and do a good job Kam
Do not diagnose to get etiological diagnosis.
C.2 Identify diagnostic points
C.2.1 and differential diagnosis of viral hepatitis
Viral Hepatitis Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C (formerly known as post-transfusion non-A non-B hepatitis), D-type liver
Inflammation and hepatitis E (formerly known as epidemic or intestinal transmission of non-A non-hepatitis B).
Viral hepatitis should be based on epidemiological history, symptoms, signs and laboratory tests and other comprehensive analysis, and refer to the national disease
The diagnostic criteria for the revision of the toxic hepatitis meeting (see Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases,.1991). Serological signs
Is one of the main diagnostic indicators, but should not rely solely on the signs to determine the diagnosis.
Table C.1 Clinical and epidemiological significance of serological markers commonly used in viral hepatitis
Hepatitis type serological markers
(5 species)
Growth time Clinical and epidemiological significance
Type A
(HA)
Anti-HAV-IgM early onset of hepatitis A, 3 to 4 months
Can be measured
Acute or convalescence
Anti-HAV-IgG appears late for HAV-IgM for several years
Even for decades
Acute hepatitis recovery period, or past suffering from type
Hepatitis, that has immunity
Type B
(HB)
HBsAg latency at the end of the week before the onset of detection, hair
Disease peaked, 80% of patients with acute hepatitis disease
After 1 to 3 months disappeared, such as within 6 months
Still not negative, suggesting that there may be chronic
Acute latency, acute phase, chronic phase, and
"Carrier" of the important signs. There is
HBV infection exists
Anti-HBs acute hepatitis recovery later, subclinical sense
Dyeing and inoculation of hepatitis B virus vaccine also appeared,
HBsAg carrying state will disappear
The protection of HBV has a neutralizing effect
Antibody. That has immunity
HBcAg circulating serum plus detergent can be detected usually indicate viral replication, patient blood and
Body fluids are contagious. Generally do not detect this standard
Anti-HBc-IgM in the acute phase, recovery period appears, 3 to 6
Month can decline or disappear, chronic phase, such as positive
Often prompted to have activity
New signs of infection and viral replication. hold
Continued positive that disease progression
Anti-HBc-IgG acute infection after 1 to 2 months, and continued
Several years or more, subclinical infection also
appear
Said there was hepatitis B virus infection
HBeAg acute phase of the vast majority of positive, disappear earlier
HBsAg, such as lasts for more than 3 months
Develop into chronic
Is the core of the soluble components of HBV, disease
Poison replication occurs when the acute patient was over
Sexually positive, chronic patients with HBV complex
System and the patient has an important sign of infectious
Anti-HBe acute hepatitis recovery period of 3 to 6 months or so out
Now, and can last for more than a few years, chronic hepatitis
Virus, replication was positive
Acute hepatitis recovery, some chronic hepatitis
HBsAg positive, said viral replication
Not active, low infectious; HBsAg negative
Sex, suggesting that there was a previous HBV infection
Type C
(HC)
Anti-HCV occurs 2 to 6 months after the onset of chronic phase
Continuous positive
Acute hepatitis late and chronic hepatitis
Ding type
(HD)
HDAg acute, chronic infection occurs when the acute phase was a positive, chronic infection
Continued to appear, all with HBsAg and HBc
Positive
Anti-HD-IgM acute and chronic infection are associated with HBsAg and HBc positive
Anti-HD-IgG acute, chronic infection and infection have recovered when anti-HBs and anti-
HBc-IgG positive, suggesting that hepatitis has been controlled
E type
(HE)
Anti-HE-IgM acute phase appears, the recovery of acute hepatitis E diagnosis
Anti-HE-IgG titer is low, difficult to detect
At present, China's most common viral hepatitis is hepatitis B.
Table C.2 Common patterns of hepatitis B virus positive markers in clinical sera and their clinical and epidemiological significance
HBsAg anti-HBs anti-HBc-IgM anti-HBc-IgG HBeAg anti-HBe clinical, epidemiological significance
+ - + + + - acute, active, highly contagious
- + - - - after acute recovery, subclinical
Dye, after vaccination continued positive
- + - + - + ~ - acute recovery period, past infection, sub
After clinical infection, no infectious
+ - - + - + chronic viral infection with or without little activity
Viral replication, general infectious
Weak
- - - + - + may be in recovery period, or still low
Infection, HbsAg very low titer, not
found out
+ - - - - - acute latency, acute phase and carry
Who are required to follow up
- - + - - - combined with clinically diagnosed acute B
Liver, especially in clinical often have more
Heavy or severe hepatitis
Description. single anti-HBc positive, clinically possible. (1) past infection, has been restored, anti-HBc titer low (or side
(2) there is still HBV infection, HBsAg titer is low, failed to detect; (3) false positive.
The original recessive hepatitis B infection or hepatitis B virus "carriers", in contact with liver poisoning after liver disease performance and liver function test
Abnormal examination, or the original cause of occupational poisoning liver disease is basically stable, and new or combined with viral hepatitis, diagnosis and identification
Diagnosis based on the history of viral hepatitis and clinical manifestations, combined with occupational exposure hist...
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of GBZ59-2024_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate GBZ59-2024_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of GBZ59-2024_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of GBZ59-2024_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay. Question 5: Should I purchase the latest version GBZ59-2024?Answer: Yes. Unless special scenarios such as technical constraints or academic study, you should always prioritize to purchase the latest version GBZ59-2024 even if the enforcement date is in future. Complying with the latest version means that, by default, it also complies with all the earlier versions, technically.
|