HOME   Cart(5)   Quotation   About-Us Policy PDFs Standard-List
www.ChineseStandard.net Database: 189759 (19 Oct 2025)

FZ/T 41001-2014 English PDF

US$299.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 3 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
FZ/T 41001-2014: Mulberry spun silk material
Status: Valid

FZ/T 41001: Evolution and historical versions

Standard IDContents [version]USDSTEP2[PDF] delivered inStandard Title (Description)StatusPDF
FZ/T 41001-2014English299 Add to Cart 3 days [Need to translate] Mulberry spun silk material Valid FZ/T 41001-2014
FZ/T 41001-1994English319 Add to Cart 3 days [Need to translate] Silkworm silk spinning raw material Obsolete FZ/T 41001-1994

PDF similar to FZ/T 41001-2014


Standard similar to FZ/T 41001-2014

FZ/T 50015   FZ/T 42002   FZ/T 41005   FZ/T 41004   

Basic data

Standard ID FZ/T 41001-2014 (FZ/T41001-2014)
Description (Translated English) Mulberry spun silk material
Sector / Industry Spinning & Textile Industry Standard (Recommended)
Classification of Chinese Standard W42
Classification of International Standard 59.060.10
Word Count Estimation 13,180
Date of Issue 5/6/2014
Date of Implementation 10/1/2014
Older Standard (superseded by this standard) FZ/T 41001-1994
Quoted Standard GB/T 8170; GB/T 9111; GB/T 26380
Regulation (derived from) Ministry of Industry and Information Technology - Announcement 2014 No 32; Industry standards for filing notice 2014 No. 6 (total 174).
Issuing agency(ies) Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China
Summary This Standard specifies the length of spit, spit bar, stagnation head, the terms and definitions under cocoon coats and silkworm cocoon silk and other materials, requirements, grading requirements, test methods, inspection rules, packaging and marking. Th

FZ/T 41001-2014: Mulberry spun silk material

---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Mulberry spun silk material ICS 59.060.10 W42 People's Republic of China textile industry standards Replacing FZ/T 41001-1994 Silkworm silk material Issued on. 2014-05-06 2014-10-01 implementation Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China released

Foreword

This standard was drafted in accordance with GB/T 1.1-2009 given rules. This standard is a revision of FZ/T 41001-1994 "silkworm silk material" in. Instead of the standard FZ/T 41001-1994. This standard Compared with the FZ/T 41001-1994 main changes are as follows. --- Increased spit strip requirements. The standard proposed by China Textile Industry Association. This standard by the National Standardization Technical Committee silk (SAC/TC401) centralized. This standard was drafted. Zhejiang Silk Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Suzie Silk Co., Ltd., Qingdao CIQ, Ann Choi Hui-day Silk Co., Ltd. Jiaxing Jin Ying Silk. The main drafters of this standard. Chen Song, Zhao Ling, Pan Lulu, Zhou Ying, Zhang Ying, Chen Xiaomei. This standard replaces the standards previously issued as follows. --- FJ287-1981; --- FZ/T 41001-1994. Silkworm silk material

1 Scope

This standard specifies the long spit, spit bars, head lag, the terms and definitions under cocoon coats and the like silkworm cocoon silk materials, requirements, grading regulations, inspection party Method, inspection rules, packaging and identification. This standard applies to assess the quality of the raw material silkworm silk.

2 Normative references

The following documents for the application of this document is essential. For dated references, only the dated version suitable for use herein Member. For undated references, the latest edition (including any amendments) applies to this document. GB/T 8170 repair value expressed about the rules and limit values and judgment GB/T 9111 Test Method for Dried silkworm GB/T 26380 Textiles Silk term

3 Terms and Definitions

GB/T 9111, GB/T 26380 and defined by the following terms and definitions apply to this document. 3.1 Article spit frison Cocoon in the automatic silk reeling machines cable lines Rio produced silk thread is formed after treatment like silk thread.

4 Requirements

4.1 long spit 4.1.1 distinguish between the head and tail, neat lines was uniform bundles state, stiff bar, caking hard strip, lining less pupa cocoon. 1m and the length of each beam 4.1.2 above, mass (700 ± 100) g. 4.1.3 long spit grading each lot, the classification provisions in Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1 long spit grading regulations --- the main test items The main test items grade One two three four Finishing Profiles Lines neat uniform, head and tail points Qing, head of small soft lumps Neat lines, head and tail basic Distinguish, head of small lumps Slightly irregular lines irregular lines Save practicing rate /% ≤ 24.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 Color white, shiny white, shiny grayish yellow whole bunch of poor local grayish yellow Article stiff rate /% ≤ 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 40mm and above hybrid fiber Victoria/(root/bundle) ≤ Table 2 long spit grading regulations --- benefit test items Test items subsidy Attached grade Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Caking hard strip/(pcs/bundle) ≤ 4 7 10 13 Pupal cocoon lining/(pcs/bundle) ≤ 2 5 8 11 4.1.4 The basic level of assessment 4.1.4.1 based on the minimum "before finishing" "color" "practice Save Rate" "Article stiff rate" "miscellaneous fibers" five major items subject to inspection results one indeed Set a basic level. 4.1.4.2 The main test items in any of the test results below the minimum level, compared with substandard level. 4.1.5 downgrade provisions subsidy inspection 4.1.5.1 If the test project grants (Article caking hard liner pupae and cocoons) in any of the test results one level below basic level two, or two of Test results below the basic level one stage, on the basic level has been assessed along the lower level. 4.1.5.2 If the test project test results subsidy to any one of the below basic level three or above, or less than two test results The basic level two or above, on the basic level has been assessed along the lower levels. 4.1.5.3 If the test project test results subsidy to any one of the lowest level more than doubled over, all reduced to substandard levels. 4.2 spit 4.2.1 lines neat uniform, no stiff strip, no twist strips, caking hard strip, lining less pupa cocoon. 4.2.2 Quality spit in each bundle of bars per bundle (1000 ± 100) g. 4.2.3 spit lot for the classification, grading its provisions are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3 spit grading regulations --- the main test items The main test items grade One two three four Finishing Profiles Lines neat uniform, Soft touch, no twist strips Neat lines, feel soft, There are bars twist < 2% In neat lines, feel In general, there is a twist strip < 5% Irregular lines, feel bad, There twist strip ≥5% Save practicing rate /% ≤ 27.0 29.0 31.0 33.0 Color white, glossy Whiter, local grayish yellow, Gloss poor Full beam grayish yellow, slightly Shiny, local grayish yellow Full beam grayish yellow, Gray, dull 40mm and above hybrid fiber / (Root/bundle) ≤ Table 4 spit grading regulations --- benefit test items Test items subsidy Attached grade Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Caking hard strip/(pcs/bundle) ≤ 4 7 10 13 Pupal cocoon lining/(pcs/bundle) ≤ 2 5 8 11 4.2.4 The basic level of assessment 4.2.4.1 According to "before finishing" "color" "practice Save Rate" "40mm and above hybrid fiber" four major items subject to inspection results minimum A defined basic level. 4.2.4.2 The main test items in any of the test results below the minimum level, compared with substandard level. 4.2.5 downgrade provisions subsidy inspection 4.2.5.1 If the test project grants (Article caking hard liner pupae and cocoons) in any of the test results one level below basic level two, or two of Test results below the basic level one stage, on the basic level has been assessed along the lower level. 4.2.5.2 If the test project test results subsidy to any one of the below basic level three or above, or less than two test results The basic level two or above, on the basic level has been assessed along the lower levels. 4.2.5.3 If the test project test results subsidy to any one of the lowest level more than doubled over, all reduced to substandard levels. 4.3 Lag head 4.3.1 velvet corduroy block good, feel full state block rectangular sheets, strip stiff stiff block, less pupae and pupae lining. 4.3.2 Each Lag head mass of (400 ± 50) g. 4.3.3 Delay head grade each lot, the classification provisions of Tables 5 and 6. TABLE 5 Lag head grading regulations --- the main test items The main test items grade One two three four Finishing Profiles Velvet corduroy good block, Feel full Usually velvet corduroy velvet corduroy block block block difference corduroy velvet poor Oil content /% ≤ 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 Color white, glossy white, glossy slightly sallow poor, poor gloss sallow, dull Article stiff stiff block rate /% ≤ 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 40mm and above hybrid fiber / (Root/Zhang) ≤ Table 6 Lag head grade test items subsidy provisions --- Test items subsidy Attached grade Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Pupae and pupae lining/(pcs/Zhang) ≤ 10 15 20 25 4.3.4 The basic level of assessment 4.3.4.1 According to "before finishing", "color", "oil content" "Article stiff stiff block rate" "miscellaneous fibers" five major items subject to inspection results of a minimum Determine the basic entry level. 4.3.4.2 The main test items in any of the test results below the minimum level, compared with substandard level. 4.3.5 downgrade provisions subsidy inspection 4.3.5.1 If the test project grants (pupa and pupa lining) test results below the basic level two-level, on the basic level has been assessed along the lower level. 4.3.5.2 If the test results of the test items below basic subsidy level three or above, on the basic level has been assessed along the lower levels. 4.3.5.3 If the test results exceed the minimum grant level of test items more than doubled, it should be reduced to substandard levels. 4.4 cocoon coat 4.4.1 fluffy cotton quality, excellent Zhang block. 4.4.2 Each cocoon quality clothing at (300 ± 50) g. 4.4.3 cocoon coat graded each lot, the classification provisions are shown in Table 7. Table 7 cocoon coat grading regulations Test items grade One two Before finishing fluffy cotton quality, good quality cotton sheets block less fluffy, general Zhang block Color white, yellow no oil, no oil Impurity rate /% ≤ 0.20 0.50 4.4.4 According to the test results, "before finishing" "color" "impurity rate" three inspection items in one of the lowest rating. 4.4.5 to reach the two substandard level. 4.5 under cocoon 4.5.1 Under cocoon by double cocoon Palace, mouth cocoon, macular cocoon, thin cocoon, cocoon soup, rotten cocoon according to GB/T 9111 are classified, so that a clear classification. 4.5.2 Under cocoon grading each lot, the classification provisions are shown in Table 8. Table 8 below cocoon grading regulations Test items category Cocoon double Palace cocoon port Ratings Ratings One two three four Cut mouth, mouse port, port moth maggot hole One two one two Cocoon shell rate /% ≥ 48.00 45.00 45.00 or less - - 48.00 45.00 Categories unclear /% ≤ 3.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 Impurity rate /% ≤ 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 Test items category Macular cocoon thin soup cocoon cocoon cocoon rotten Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings One two three four one two one two one two Cocoon shell rate /% ≥ 48.00 45.00 45.00 the following 44.00 40.00 - - - - Categories unclear /% ≤ 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 Impurity rate /% ≤ 0.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 2.50 1.00 2.50 4.5.3 According to "cocoon shell rate" "classification unclear" "impurity rate" test project test results in a minimum one rating below the minimum level, compared to the like Outer level. 4.5.4 Classification unclear when more than 20% of the minimum rating level using low value cocoon. 4.5.5 silkworm silk moisture regain raw material was 12.0%.

5 Inspection Rules

5.1 Batch Long spit, spit bars, according to the same stagnation head reeling models, the same level group batches; cocoon coat, according to the same under cocoon cocoon stage, the same level group batches. Net weight of each batch 500kg ~ 600kg, 600kg calculated over two batches. 5.2 Sampling Silk raw number of samples specified in Table 9. The number of samples specified in Table 9 category Long spit, spit strip Beam/batch Lag head Zhang/batch Cocoon coat Zhang/batch Under cocoon kg/batch Number 5552 5.3 Sampling Method 5.3.1 each batch of random 5 pack. 5.3.2 spit, spit long, slow head, cocoon coat 1 per pack pumping beam (photos), which face each draw a bottom beam (photos), the central pumping beam 3 (photos), a total of five bundles (Photos). 5.3.3 Central 2 beam (photos) for testing the amount of the public, practicing reducing rate, oil content, and the remaining three beams (photos) for visual inspection. 5.3.4 Under cocoon draw about 400g per pack to mix randomly selected (100 ± 5) g for testing moisture regain, take 100 (excluding other cocoon class) cocoon Layer rate test; take 1kg unclear for classification and impurity rate test.

6 test method

6.1 by weight and the amount of public inspection 6.1.1 Equipment and Tools 6.1.1.1 Electronic scales. scale value ≤1g. 6.1.1.2 Balance. division value ≤0.01g. 6.1.1.3 with the balance of the oven. Balance. division value ≤0.01g. 6.1.2 Weight Test Take each strip spit, spit long, slow head, cocoon clothing 3 bundle (photos), electronic weighing scales, to calculate the 3 beam (photos) averages, calculated results are accurate to one decimal After a point. 6.1.3 the amount of public inspection 6.1.3.1 respectively extracted beam 2 (photos) from each sample in a sample, each quality (100 ± 5) g. 6.1.3.2 The extracted sample weighed immediately come to "wet weight" on the balance. 6.1.3.3 The weighed sample in parts of the unit were loosely placed in the basket bake at a temperature (105 ~ 110) ℃ of drying to constant weight (interval 10min weighing not more than twice the difference 50mg), returns "dry weight." 6.1.3.4 Found Regain according to formula (1) calculation, calculation results are accurate to one decimal place. W = m-m0 m0 × 100% (1) Where. W --- Found moisture regain,%; m --- total wet weight of sample in grams (g); m0 --- total dry weight of sample in grams (g). 6.1.3.5 Public amount according to formula (2) calculation results accurate to two decimal places. mk = mj × 100 Wk 100 W (2) Where. mk --- the amount of the public, in kilograms (kg); mj --- net weight, in kilograms (kg); Wk --- moisture regain,%; W --- Found moisture regain%. 6.2 Visual inspection 6.2.1 Equipment and Tools 6.2.1.1 Electronic scales. scale value ≤1g. 6.2.1.2 Balance. division value ≤0.01g. 6.2.1.3 scissors. 6.2.1.4 Steel tape. 2m. 6.2.1.5 Test station. test sample flat on the stage, conducted in natural light. 6.2.2 long spit length test In both ends of the largest parts of the head and tail of each beam spit as long range measurement, beam by steel tape measure, calculate the average of 3 beam, fine results After correct to one decimal place. 6.2.3 before finishing, color inspection Eyes by using beam (photos) assessment, 2 beam (photos) above similar assessment results as the test results. 6.2.4 Article stiff rate, stiff stiff block rate test strips 6.2.4.1 strand by strand (photos) will strip stiff, stiff stiff block strip cut, with the balance weighing, calculating 3 beam (photos) average. Article 6.2.4.2 stiff rate, stiff stiff block strip ratio according to formula (3) calculation, calculation results are accurate to one decimal place. J = ma mb × 100% (3) Where. J --- stiff Article (Article stiff stiff block) rate,% ma --- stiff Article (Article stiff stiff block) the total mass in grams (g); mb --- 3 beam (photos) of the total mass of the sample in grams (g). 6.2.5 Miscellaneous Fiber Inspection Picked each bundle (photos) miscellaneous number of fibers in the sample is calculated 3 beam (photos) average the results to the nearest integer. 6.2.6 caking hard strip, lining pupa cocoon, pupa and pupa lining inspection Culling (Zhang) sample of a few per bundle (more than half of a pupa count), calculated beam 3 (photos) average the results to the nearest integer. 6.2.7 impurity rate test 6.2.7.1 The cocoon coat, picked out under the cocoon, with weighing scales. 6.2.7.2 cocoon coat impurity rate according to equation (4) calculation, calculation results accurate to two decimal places. C = mr mt × 100% (4) Where. C --- cocoon coat impurity rate,%; mr --- impurities total mass in grams (g); mt --- 3 Zhang mass of the sample in grams (g). 6.2.7.3 Under cocoon impurity rate according to equation (5) calculation results accurate to two decimal places. R = mr 1000 × 100% (5) Where. R --- By cocoon impurity rate,%; mr --- impurities total mass in grams (g). 6.2.8 cocoon layer rate test 6.2.8.1 cocoon said sample mass, or "cocoon weight." 6.2.8.2 The sample was quickly cut sectional cocoon, called mass cocoon, the "cocoon shell weight." 6.2.8.3 cocoon shell ratio according to equation (6) calculation results accurate to two decimal places. S = mc md × 100% (6) Where. S --- cocoon layer rate,%; mc --- cocoon shell weight in grams (g); md --- cocoon weight in grams (g). 6.2.9 Inspection classification is unclear 6.2.9.1 In the sample selected from the cocoon stage cocoon other cocoon removed and weighed. 6.2.9.2 unclear classification according to formula (7) calculation results accurate to two decimal places. F = me 1000 × 100% (7) Where. F --- classification is unclear,%; me --- other cocoon mass, in grams (g). 6.3 Internal Quality Inspection 6.3.1 practice test rate reduction 6.3.1.1 Equipment and tools 6.3.1.1.1 analytical balance. division value ≤0.01g. 6.3.1.1.2 with the balance of the oven. Balance. division value ≤0.01g. 6.3.1.1.3 beaker. 2L. 6.3.1.1.4 furnace. 1kW. 6.3.1.1.5 set the clock. 6.3.1.1.6 ordinary glass thermometer. minimum scale value 1 ℃. 6.3.1.2 Reagents 6.3.1.2.1 fatty acid containing 60% industrial neutral soap. 6.3.1.2.2 anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3). 6.3.1.2.3 distilled water. 6.3.1.3 Test conditions Test conditions are shown in Table 10. Table 10 rate reduction practice test test conditions The first sequential quadratic formula Industrial neutral soap/(g/L) 5 - Anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3)/(g/L) 0.5 1 Distilled water distilled water distilled water Bath ratio 1.100 1.100 Temperature/℃ 98 ~ 100 100 Time/min 30 20 6.3.1.4 Test Procedure 6.3.1.4.1 Take Two (10 ± 1) g sample (including head and tail), placed in an oven heated to (120 ± 3) ℃ temperature drying to constant weight (10min interval Weighing twice the difference does not exceed 50mg), namely "dry weight before practice." 6.3.1.4.2 according to test conditions specified in Table 10 of the samples was put into practice after scouring solution twice with distilled water (65 ± 5) ℃ full wash Polyester, squeezed, then the sample is placed within the oven temperature to (120 ± 3) ℃ temperature drying to constant weight (10min interval weighing not more than twice the difference 50mg), namely "dry weight after practice." 6.3.1.4.3 The test results calculated as follows. a) the rate of reduction to practice according to equation (8) Calculated. E = mz-mh mz × 100% (8) Where. E --- practice reduction rate,%; mz --- practice before the dry weight in grams (g); After practicing mh --- dry weight in grams (g). b) calculate the arithmetic average of 2 parts of the sample rate reduction to practice, the results after taking one decimal place. 6.3.2 Oil Content Test 6.3.2.1 apparatus, instruments and reagents 6.3.2.1.1 with the balance of the oven. Balance. division value ≤0.01g. 6.3.2.1.2 analytical balance, dividing the value ≤0.0001g. 6.3.2.1.3 constant temperature water bath, 40 ℃ ~ 100 ℃. 6.3.2.1.4 Soxhlet extractor, accepted the flask. 6.3.2.1.5 dryer, equipped with color gel. 6.3.2.1.6 weighing bottle. 150mL. 6.3.2.1.7 qualitative filter paper. 6.3.2.1.8 ether (chemically pure or analytical). 6.3.2.2 Sample Sample taken 2 copies, each (5 ± 0.5) g. 6.3.2.3 Test Procedure 6.3.2.3.1 The receiving flask weighing bottle and placed (120 ± 3) ℃ in the drying oven to constant weight, weighed and recorded quality. 6.3.2.3.2 The 2 parts of the sample with qualitative filter paper wrap, size, elastic fit. 6.3.2.3.3 mounted on a heated water bath Soxhlet extractor connection cooling pipe, connected to the cooling water, heating water bath. 6.3.2.3.4 2 parts coated with qualitative filter paper samples were dipped into a Soxhlet extractor pumping device inside. Then poured into ethyl ether, immerse test Siphon-like and over the produce reflux condenser connected. 6.3.2.3.5 adjust the water bath temperature, the receiving flask micro-boiling ether, maintained at reflux for 12 times per hour, a total reflux 2h. 6.3.2.3.6 reflux is completed, remove the condenser, remove the sample drawn from the leaching vessel, squeezed solvent removed paper, into the weighing bottle. Draw a line on Condenser, recovery ether. 6.3.2.3.7 be volatile ether after substantially exhausted, it will be equipped with a sample weighing bottles and flasks on receiving (120 ± 3) ℃ in the oven drying to constant weight, Remove weighing vessel and receiving flask was quickly placed in the dryer, cooled to room temperature, weighed and recorded quality. Note. The sample constant weight was known for about 120min, continuous weighing time interval of about 25min. 6.3.2.3.8 The test results calculated as follows. a) a sample oil content according to formula (9) Calculated. Q = ma1 ma1 ma2 × 100% (9) Where. Q --- oil content of the sample,%; Dry mass ma1 --- fat in grams (g); After ma2 --- skimmed dry mass of the sample, in grams (g). b) calculate the arithmetic average of 2 parts oil content of the sample, the results after taking one decimal place.

7 packaging and identification

7.1 Silkworm Silk Spinning raw material bag packaging. 7.2 Zhakou suspended at the label, indicating the batch, date, company name, product name, grade, net and gross.

8 Rounding value

Various values of the standard calculation, according to GB/T 8170 rounding off rule choice.

9 Other

If the supply and demand sides of silkworm silk raw material requirements, packaging, marking otherwise required, or may be separate contractual agreement and enforced.

Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:

Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of FZ/T 41001-2014_English be delivered?

Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate FZ/T 41001-2014_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.

Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of FZ/T 41001-2014_English with my colleagues?

Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of FZ/T 41001-2014_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.

Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?

Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countries

Question 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?

Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.

Question 5: Should I purchase the latest version FZ/T 41001-2014?

Answer: Yes. Unless special scenarios such as technical constraints or academic study, you should always prioritize to purchase the latest version FZ/T 41001-2014 even if the enforcement date is in future. Complying with the latest version means that, by default, it also complies with all the earlier versions, technically.