|
US$379.00 ยท In stock
Delivery: <= 4 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
CYT103-2014: (Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol)
Status: Valid
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| CY/T 103-2014 | English | 379 |
Add to Cart
|
4 days [Need to translate]
|
(Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol)
| Valid |
CY/T 103-2014
|
Standard similar to CYT103-2014 CY/T 274 CY/T 275 CY/T 273 Basic data | Standard ID | CY/T 103-2014 (CY/T103-2014) | | Description (Translated English) | (Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol) | | Sector / Industry | Press & Publication Industry Standard (Recommended) | | Word Count Estimation | 15,121 | | Date of Issue | 1/29/2014 | | Date of Implementation | 1/29/2014 | | Regulation (derived from) | News-Broadcasting-Press-Letter 2014 [11] | | Issuing agency(ies) | State Press and Publication Administration | CYT103-2014: (Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol)---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Specification for Quality Evaluation of Database Publication
Issued by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China
Press and Publication Industry Standards of the People's Republic of China
Specification for quality evaluation of database publications
2014-01-29 implementation
Released on January 29,.2014
Table of contents
1 Scope...1
2 Terms and definitions...1
3 Evaluation dimensions and requirements...1
3.1 Quality model...1
3.2 Evaluation model...2
3.3 Quality requirements...2
3.3.1 Process quality...2
3.3.2 Content quality...3
3.3.3 Publication quality...3
3.3.4 Technical quality...4
3.3.5 Quality of use...4
4 Evaluation principles and methods...5
4.1 Evaluation principles...5
4.2 Evaluation method...5
4.3 Evaluation information sources...5
5 Evaluation indicators and procedures...5
5.1 Individual indicators...5
5.2 Comprehensive indicators...6
5.3 Quality level...6
5.4 Utilization of evaluation score results...6
5.5 Evaluation procedures...6
Appendix A (Normative Appendix) Quality Model and Evaluation Index Table...8
References...9
Foreword
This standard is compiled in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009 "Guidelines for Standardization Work Part 1.Standard Structure and Compilation".
Appendix A of this standard is a normative appendix.
This standard was proposed and managed by the National Press and Publication Information Standardization Technical Committee.
The main drafting organizations of this standard. Beijing Wanfang Data Co., Ltd., Information Center of the Press and Publication Administration.
The main drafters of this standard. Zhang Xiumei, Liu Chengyong, Zhang Yong, Yang Yihong, Ling Feng, Wu Zhiqiang, Zhang Mo, Cheng Yuhua, Xu Jianwu, Liu Liying.
Specification for quality evaluation of database publications
1 Scope
This standard specifies the dimensions and requirements of database publication quality evaluation, evaluation principles and methods, evaluation index scales and evaluation procedures.
This standard applies to the quality evaluation of database publications.
2 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this standard.
2.1
Database
A collection of information or factual data organized logically.
2.2
Database publication
The mass media that takes the database as the content and provides one or more search methods to facilitate users to locate and access the database content.
2.3
Database publishing
The production and service process of database publications.
3 Evaluation dimensions and requirements
3.1 Quality model
The quality model of database publications is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Database publication quality model
The different dimensions in the quality model have the following correlations.
a) The database publishing process directly affects the explicit attribute quality of database publications, and the explicit attribute quality directly affects its utility;
b) The quality of the explicit attributes of database publications depends on the database publication process.
3.2 Evaluation model
The database publication quality evaluation includes five dimensions. process quality, content quality, publication quality, technical quality, and use quality.
The evaluation indicators included in the dimension are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 Database publication quality evaluation model
3.3 Quality requirements
3.3.1 Process quality
3.3.1.1 Publication process specification
The database publishing unit shall establish and implement standardized publication procedures such as drafting, editing, review, production, typesetting, printing, and distribution.
3.3.1.2 Management evaluation system
The database publishing unit shall establish and implement a systematic and standardized management evaluation system to ensure the quality of all aspects of publications. From responsibility
Measure the establishment and implementation of the editing system, editor-in-chief responsibility system, and review system.
3.3.1.3 Personnel qualifications
Personnel engaged in database publishing-related work in database publishing units shall meet the qualifications and conditions prescribed by the state. From the president and editor-in-chief
The professional qualifications of other relevant personnel and other relevant personnel shall be measured.
3.3.1.4 Advertising management system
The advertisements involved in database publications shall comply with relevant regulations. From the legality of the advertising method, the legality of the advertising content, etc.
Measure in terms of aspects.
3.3.2 Content quality
3.3.2.1 Legality
The content of database publications should comply with national laws, regulations and departmental rules related to publications. Whether it violates the Constitution, laws, regulations,
Measure whether it infringes the copyright of others and whether it infringes the legal rights and interests of others.
3.3.2.2 Authenticity
The content description of database publications should respect objective facts and be measured according to the degree of conformity between the content description and the facts.
3.3.2.3 Accuracy
The content of database publications should be correct and effective. It is measured in terms of the reliability of the content source, the relevance of the content description and a specific topic, etc.
3.3.2.4 Completeness
The content of the database publication should contain all the content elements that should be included, and a comprehensive and complete description of the topic of the publication. From the content
Measure the coverage and the completeness of the item content.
3.3.2.5 Timeliness
The content of database publications should include relevant content in a timely and effective manner to meet industry characteristics or user needs. Measured by the content lag period.
3.3.2.6 Value
The content of database publications should be able to provide users with valuable information and actively promote users' practical activities. From the content
The authority of the source may be measured by other recognized content value evaluation methods.
3.3.3 Publication quality
3.3.3.1 Language specification
Database publications should comply with the general language and writing standards of their respective types of publications and the general standards for published language and writing, from text, grammar,
Punctuation, number usage, unit of measurement, knowledge usage, etc. shall be measured; the character set encoding shall comply with the corresponding national standards.
3.3.3.2 Layout specification
Database publications should comply with the layout specifications of the respective types of publications and the corresponding layout specifications of various materials such as graphics, text, audio, and video.
3.3.3.3 Publication format specification
Different types of database publications should follow the corresponding type of publication norms.
3.3.3.4 Publication cycle control
Database publications should comply with relevant publication cycle control. From whether there is a fixed or compliant publication cycle and according to the publication week
Strictly implement the angle for measurement during the period.
3.3.3.5 Continuous update
Database publications should continue to enrich and improve their contents. Determine whether it has an update frequency that meets the characteristics of the content itself
3.3.4 Technical quality
3.3.4.1 Functional technology
Database publications should be able to effectively realize its functions. Check whether the database publication meets the technical specifications and technical functions of the corresponding carrier
Measure the completeness and advancement of energy.
3.3.4.2 Non-functional technology
Database publications should meet other technical aspects besides basic functional requirements, such as. security, stability, scalability
Performance, ease of operation and deployment, etc.
3.3.5 Quality of use
3.3.5.1 Validity
Database publications should be available, and effectively help users find relevant content for reading. Passing content inspection rate and accuracy rate
The standard is measured.
3.3.5.2 Efficiency
Database publications should be able to meet users' requirements for retrieval performance and response time, and help users quickly solve problems. Search by user
The response speed of the system is measured during the process.
3.3.5.3 Fault tolerance
Database publications should be able to allow certain errors to occur and help users recover from errors.
3.3.5.4 Ease of use
Database publications should be easy to learn and provide appropriate guidance and help information, show what users want and guide users to complete tasks. From
Whether it is easy to reach and whether it is easy to use is measured.
4 Evaluation principles and methods
4.1 Evaluation principles
Evaluation principles include.
a) Accurate, comprehensive and fair;
b) Consider both social and economic benefits;
c) Consider development and application prospects;
d) Consider the types and characteristics of different database publications;
e) Follow relevant national standards, international standards, industry standards and related technical specifications.
4.2 Evaluation method
4.2.1 Objective evaluation
Used for indicators that can be directly evaluated based on objective and authoritative data. According to relevant national laws and regulations, national standards, and industry
Standards, etc., to determine whether the database publication meets the relevant requirements of the corresponding laws, regulations, and standard documents.
4.2.2 Subjective evaluation
Use the following 2 methods for subjective evaluation.
a) Expert evaluation. It is used for indicators that need to be evaluated from the perspective of professional knowledge. Experts in the field of database and publishing
Evaluation of database publications;
b) User evaluation. Indicators used for evaluation from the perspective of user use. The users of database publications will evaluate the database from the perspective of use.
Evaluation of publications.
4.3 Evaluation information sources
The information sources used to evaluate the quality of database publications include the database publication itself, the certification materials provided by the database publishing unit, and
Other reliable sources of information. among them.
a) If the evaluation can be achieved through direct observation or the use of database publications, the database publication itself should be used as the source of evaluation information;
b) If it involves content that cannot be directly reflected in database publications, such as management procedures, systems, etc., the database publication list should be used
The certification materials provided by the position as the source of the evaluation information;
c) In addition, information from reliable third-party sources can also be used as a reference for evaluation, such as the press and publication management department or the business management department
Reward and punishment information for publications or publishing units, etc.
5 Evaluation indicators and procedures
5.1 Individual indicators
The type of scale used in the measurement process uses a scoring system for the evaluation indicators, and the specific scores are given when the indicators are measured. The score table is shown in Table 1.
5.2 Comprehensive indicators
According to the content and type of the database publication to be evaluated, determine whether each individual evaluation index is a key evaluation index one by one, and then calculate
The arithmetic average of the scores of various indicators is used as the comprehensive evaluation score of the quality of database publications.
5.3 Quality level
The quality level is divided into qualified and unqualified according to the key indicator scores and comprehensive evaluation scores. The corresponding score requirements are as follows.
a) Qualified. each key evaluation index is equal to or higher than 3 points, and the comprehensive evaluation score is equal to or higher than 3 points;
b) Unqualified. Any item of the key evaluation indicators is less than 3 points, or the comprehensive evaluation score is less than 3 points.
5.4 Utilization of evaluation score results
When evaluating a single database publication, you can use the comprehensive evaluation score or the above-mentioned quality level to evaluate the results; for two or more
When evaluating and comparing a database publication, a comparative evaluation can be made based on the results of the quality grade evaluation through the comprehensive evaluation score.
5.5 Evaluation procedure
The quality evaluation of database publications will be raised in the following situations.
a) When the management department or distribution unit wants to compare and appraise the pros and cons of several database publications;
b) When the database publication is completed and the results need to be declared;
c) When the user needs to purchase or use a certain database publication;
d) When the database publishing unit needs to understand the market effect of the publication;
e) Other needs.
The quality evaluation procedure of database publications is shown in Figure 3.
According to Article 5 of this standard, combined with the content and type of database publications to be evaluated,
Further refine and determine the specific measurement indicators (the above-mentioned quality requirements refer to the measurement
Degree indicators are for reference only) and related evaluation rules.
Measure and collect various types of data for evaluation, and study and analyze the data in accordance with the evaluation rules.
According to the analysis of evaluation rules and data, complete the evaluation report.
Appendix A
(Normative appendix)
Quality model and evaluation index table
The quality model and evaluation index comparison table are shown in Table A.1.
Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of CYT103-2014_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate CYT103-2014_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 2 ~ 4 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time. Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of CYT103-2014_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of CYT103-2014_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet. Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to [email protected]. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.
|