Search result: GB/T 42883-2023
| Standard ID | Contents [version] | USD | STEP2 | [PDF] delivered in | Standard Title (Description) | Status | PDF |
| GB/T 42883-2023 | English | 464 |
Add to Cart
|
4 days [Need to translate]
|
Smart community infrastructures - Maturity model for assessment and improvement
| Valid |
GB/T 42883-2023
|
| Standard ID | GB/T 42883-2023 (GB/T42883-2023) | | Description (Translated English) | Smart community infrastructures - Maturity model for assessment and improvement | | Sector / Industry | National Standard (Recommended) | | Classification of Chinese Standard | A00 | | Classification of International Standard | 13.020.20 | | Word Count Estimation | 26,286 | | Date of Issue | 2023-08-06 | | Date of Implementation | 2023-12-01 | | Issuing agency(ies) | State Administration for Market Regulation, National Standardization Administration |
GB/T 42883-2023. Smart city infrastructure assessment and improvement maturity model
ICS 13.020.20
CCSA00
National Standards of People's Republic of China
smart city infrastructure
Evaluate and improve maturity models
(ISO 37153.2017,IDT)
Published on 2023-08-06
Implemented on 2023-12-01
State Administration for Market Regulation
Released by the National Standardization Administration Committee
Table of contents
PrefaceⅠ
Introduction II
1 range 1
2 Normative reference documents 1
3 Terms and Definitions 1
4 Foundations of the Urban Infrastructure Maturity Model3
4.1 General 3
4.2 Performance Evaluation Form 3
4.3 Assessment aspects of urban infrastructure4
4.4 Method overview 5
4.5 Urban Infrastructure Maturity Model 5
5 Preparation of performance evaluation form 6
5.1 General 6
5.2 Determine the purpose of assessment 6
5.3 Feature recognition 6
5.4 Methods for defining maturity level criteria7
6 Evaluate and improve9
6.1 General 9
6.2 Assessment 9
6.3 Improvement 9
Appendix A (informative) Conceptual description of assessment10
Appendix B (informative) Detailed explanation of the urban infrastructure maturity model definition 12
Appendix C (Informative) Performance Evaluation Form (ACT) Example 14
Appendix D (informative) Continuous improvement of urban infrastructure 17
Reference 20
Preface
This document complies with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Standardization Work Guidelines Part 1.Structure and Drafting Rules of Standardization Documents"
Drafting.
This document is equivalent to ISO 37153.2017 "Smart City Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Maturity Model".
This document has made the following minimal editorial changes.
--- Added Notes 2 and 3 of term 3.9 and sources to ensure the coordination of this document with GB /Z 42192-2022;
---Deleted Note 1 in Table 1 of 4.2, and the content of Note 1 has been directly displayed in Table 1 after being translated into Chinese.
Please note that some content in this document may be subject to patents. The publisher of this document assumes no responsibility for identifying patents.
This document is proposed and coordinated by the National Standardization Technical Committee for Sustainable Urban Development (SAC/TC567).
This document was drafted by. Zhongguancun Lejia Smart Residential Area Industrial Technology Alliance, Henan Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd.
Division, China Electronics Engineering Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Institute of Standardization, Nankai University, Beijing Institute of Standardization, China Urban Science
Research Association, Sichuan Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China Southwest Architecture Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing Yunji Technology Co., Ltd.
Company, National Energy Group New Energy Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Capital University of Economics and Business, Hubei Liantou City Operation Co., Ltd., Green Building
Smart Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Zhengzhong Design Co., Ltd., Shanghai Institute of Architectural Sciences Co., Ltd., China Construction Third Engineering Bureau
Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Zhengheshan Standardization Consulting Firm (Limited Partnership), China Construction Third Engineering Bureau First Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.,
Zhongtong Information Services Co., Ltd., Shanghai Construction Engineering Fourth Construction Group Co., Ltd., China Railway Construction Group Zhongyuan Construction Co., Ltd., Shanghai Westco
Technology Development Co., Ltd., China Power Construction Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., China Construction Shenzhen Decoration Co., Ltd., China Railway 22nd Bureau Group Co., Ltd., China Railway
Shanghai Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu Ding’anhua Intelligent Internet of Things Co., Ltd., China Construction Communications Construction Group Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Green
Chengfuli Digital Technology Co., Ltd., China Five Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd., Yibin Vocational and Technical College, Zhejiang East China Engineering Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
Company, Beijing Jiaotong University, China Construction Installation Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen Dinike Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., China Municipal Engineering Northeast Design
General Research Institute Co., Ltd., Taiji Computer Co., Ltd., Chengdu Qiruisi Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Jinmao Cloud Technology Services (Beijing)
Co., Ltd., China Construction Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd., China Construction Western Construction Co., Ltd., Nanjing Anju Construction Group Co., Ltd., Aoying
Shuchuang (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Zerodong Technology Co., Ltd., Huahui Engineering Design Group Co., Ltd., Hefei Zhihui Space Technology Co., Ltd.
Limited liability company, Zhongke Yunchuang (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.
The main drafters of this document. Yao Cuiyou, Yang Feng, Tian Chuan, Shao Chaofeng, Jiang Dong, Li Da, Du Zhanjun, Yan Maomao, Zhao Guangpo, Wang Gang, Chu Jingchun,
Wu Jifeng, Zhang Xinkai, Zheng Kaifeng, Wen Zhu, He Yu, Zhan Xiaolin, Wang Danlei, Xiang Xiang, Li Chun, Zhang Xuechen, Chai Tiefeng, Lu Guibin, Ju Ling, Dong Qijun,
Du Dengke, Xu Yansheng, Zheng Qiaoying, Cheng Xianyong, Zhi Tao, Dai Xiaoqiang, Zeng Shajie, Wang Guoguang, Yu Fangqiang, Liu Fujian, Zhang Guoyi, Zhang Fuguo,
Cao Yajun, Liu Lei, Zhang Yufen, Li Lingjian, Li Yawei, Qiu Wei, Zhou Zhihu, Yang Guang, Chen Ping, Liang Xiaochen, Zhang Haizheng, Liu Jianshi, Chang Yongshan,
Shen Xiaohui, Wen Lijuan, Liu Songtao, Zhou Xiaojun, Zhou Beichuan, Cheng Weidong, Chen Yangyang, Wen Jiangtao, Zhang Ya, Qi He, Kang Yongjun, Yang Min, Wang Xinfeng,
Liang Hong, Sai Han, Tan Xiaocong, Zhang Yexing, Huang Yiping, Wang Haoming, Yang Dong, Bai Mingmei.
introduction
In September.2015, world leaders adopted the United Nations “Transforming Our World. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” in New York.
sustainable development agenda. The agenda includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets, aiming to eradicate poverty by 2030 and promote
Prosperity and improved well-being, and reduced adverse impacts of human activities on the environment. Goal 11 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals deals with urban issues.
The theme is “Building inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities”.
Under the Sustainable Development Goals, cities and communities are positioned as "centers of ideas, commerce, culture, science, productivity and social development."
At the same time, many cities around the world are developing rapidly and are facing equity and sustainability challenges while meeting the needs of citizens.
With the growth of urban population and rapid urbanization, urban infrastructure such as energy, water, transportation, waste disposal facilities and
According to the "Infrastructure 2030" report of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), within 20 years (2010-2030), new
The total cumulative investment demand for urban infrastructure and improved urban infrastructure is approximately US$53 trillion.
Proper development of urban infrastructure is fundamental to support urban operations and activities and not only helps solve urban problems but also supports all
The 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals have played an important role in helping cities cope with challenges. In addition to providing high-quality services, the city
Municipal infrastructure should also be economically efficient and strive to reduce the environmental impact of urban activities.
In order to be able to effectively develop urban infrastructure and continuously improve performance in all aspects, it is necessary to measure the existing maturity of urban infrastructure.
level (compared to future expectations), maturity models are widely considered to be an effective tool. The maturity model describes each
The practices and processes required at each level to reliably and sustainably achieve the expected performance at that level. For example, in the ISO /IEC 15504 series
The proposed Capability Maturity Model (CMM) implements this function in the field of software development; documents such as ISO 18091 and ISO 37101 also
A framework similar to the Capability Maturity Model was promoted for local government.
This document describes the Urban Infrastructure Maturity Model (CIMM) and the use of the Urban Infrastructure Maturity Model for assessment and improvement.
A good standardization approach. The Urban Infrastructure Maturity Model helps all stakeholders understand the performance, processes and interactions of urban infrastructure.
level of operability and contribution to the city, helping them set improvement goals for urban infrastructure, thereby guiding investment and identifying
Recognize the gap between current level and target level.
Conceptually, the urban infrastructure maturity model can be represented as a series of levels, each level is built on the basis of the levels shown in Figure 1.
on top of that. See Chapters 4 and 5 of this document for details.
Figure 1 Conceptual representation of the Urban Infrastructure Maturity Model (CIMM)
In order to promote sustainable development, it is particularly important to make decisions based on the overall characteristics of urban infrastructure systems. Therefore, this document is a review
The assessment method provides a systematic framework, namely the urban infrastructure maturity model, including five parameters of the maturity of each characteristic of urban infrastructure.
Exam level.
The assessment based on the urban infrastructure maturity model can compare different cities, and can also compare by defining the assessment objects and scope.
Compare the current and future state of infrastructure in individual cities. For example, in the “Plan-Implement-Verify-Act” process of developing urban infrastructure
(PDCA)" cycle, this document may be particularly useful during the "Planning" and "Verification" phases to help users assess current performance, processes and interactions.
operability and review progress towards achieving expected improvements.
Specifically, this document supports the following stakeholders.
a) Residents.
---Improve their quality of life.
b) Urban infrastructure owners.
---Determine which performance characteristics of urban infrastructure should be prioritized;
---Determine which aspects of technical performance should be prioritized for improvement.
c) Urban infrastructure providers.
---Determine which urban infrastructure products will meet specified requirements;
---Determine the development direction of future urban infrastructure products and services.
d) Urban infrastructure operators.
--- Determine the current performance of the urban infrastructure they operate;
---Determine appropriate performance improvement processes.
e) Investors.
---Determine which type of infrastructure investments will best meet expected performance levels.
f) Urban planner or government decision-maker.
---Evaluate urban planning and determine which infrastructure needs priority.
g) All stakeholders.
---Ensure investments in urban infrastructure maximize performance and minimize life cycle costs;
---Promote the coordination of residents, city managers and environmental needs;
---Promote the sustainable development and disaster resilience of cities.
smart city infrastructure
Evaluate and improve maturity models
1 Scope
This document provides the basis for a maturity model that assesses the technical performance, processes and interoperability of urban infrastructure and its contribution to the city.
foundations, guidelines, requirements, and suggestions for future improvements.
This document applies to.
a) All types of urban infrastructure, including but not limited to energy, water, transport, waste disposal and information and communication technologies (ICT);
b) Single type of urban infrastructure or multiple types of urban infrastructure;
c) All types of cities, regardless of geographical location, size, economic structure, and economic development stage;
d) All applicable stages of the infrastructure life cycle (e.g. planning/design, construction, operations, decommissioning).
Note. The utilization of natural systems, such as green infrastructure, is also considered a type of infrastructure.
2 Normative reference documents
The contents of the following documents constitute essential provisions of this document through normative references in the text. Among them, the dated quotations
For undated referenced documents, only the version corresponding to that date applies to this document; for undated referenced documents, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to
this document.
3 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this document.
3.1
maturity model maturity model
A model derived from one or more specified assessment models that is capable of showing the development of a city's infrastructure assessment categories in stages.
degree or level of progress.
3.2
maturitylevelmaturitylevel
A hierarchical scale of urban infrastructure maturity that characterizes the assessment of the success of urban infrastructure within the context of the maturity model used.
Maturity.
3.3
impact
Changes in economic, environmental, and other urban issues caused by urban infrastructure, both favorable and unfavorable.
3.4
A table listing the evaluation objectives corresponding to each level, including the feature set of the urban infrastructure maturity model and its maturity level
level.
......
|