Home Cart Quotation About-Us
www.ChineseStandard.net
SEARCH

HJ 981-2018 English PDF

US$509.00 ยท In stock
Delivery: <= 5 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
HJ 981-2018: Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry
Status: Valid
Standard IDUSDBUY PDFLead-DaysStandard Title (Description)Status
HJ 981-2018509 Add to Cart 5 days Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry Valid

Similar standards

HG/T 5871   GB/T 27611   GB/T 20861   HJ 982   HJ 983   HJ 980   

Basic data

Standard ID: HJ 981-2018 (HJ981-2018)
Description (Translated English): Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry
Sector / Industry: Environmental Protection Industry Standard
Classification of Chinese Standard: Z04
Word Count Estimation: 22,226
Issuing agency(ies): Ministry of Ecology and Environment

HJ 981-2018: Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry


---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity - Coking chemical industry National Environmental Protection Standard of the People's Republic Technical Guide for Strong Sources of Pollution Sources Coking Chemical Industry Technical guidelines of accounting method for pollution source intensity Coking chemical industry Published on.2018-11-27 2019-01-01 implementation Ministry of Ecology and Environment released

Content

Foreword. II 1 Scope.1 2 Normative references 1 3 Terms and Definitions 2 4 source strong accounting program..2 5 Strong source method for waste gas pollution source..6 6 Wastewater pollution source and source strong accounting method..8 7 Noise source strong accounting method 10 8 Solid waste source strong accounting method.10 9 other.11 Appendix A (informative appendix) Coking chemical industry source strength accounting results and related parameter list form 12 Appendix B (informative appendix) Technology and effect of waste gas pollution control in coking chemical industry.15 Appendix C (informative appendix) Coking chemical industry wastewater pollution control technology and effect..17 Appendix D (informative) The noise source of the coking chemical industry and the noise reduction effect of control measures. 18 Appendix E (informative) The amount of solid waste generated in the coking chemical industry.19

Foreword

To implement the Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China, the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China Pollution Prevention and Control Law, Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Environmental Noise Pollution, "The Chinese People's Republic of China Laws and regulations on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Wastes, etc., improve the system of strong accounting methods for fixed sources of pollution, and guide and standardize coking chemistry This standard is formulated for the strong accounting of industrial pollution sources. This standard specifies the basic principles, contents, and accounting methods for the strong accounting of waste gas, wastewater, noise, and solid waste pollution sources in the coking chemical industry. Law and requirements, etc. Appendix A to Appendix E of this standard are informative annexes. This standard is the first release. This standard is formulated by the Department of Environmental Impact Assessment and Emission Management of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, and the Department of Regulations and Standards. This standard is mainly drafted by. Environmental Engineering Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Hebei Zhonglian Energy Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Metallurgical Worker Industry Planning Institute. This standard is approved by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment on November 27,.2018. This standard has been implemented since January 1,.2019. This standard is explained by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Technical Guide for Strong Sources of Pollution Sources Coking Chemical Industry

1 Scope of application

This standard stipulates the basic principles, contents, accounting methods and requirements for the strong accounting of pollution sources in the coking chemical industry. This standard applies to the new (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source of the coking chemical industry and the strong accounting of existing engineering pollution sources. This standard applies to the source and strong accounting of normal and abnormal emissions of the coking chemical industry, and is not applicable to sudden leaks, fires, explosions, etc. Strong source accounting in the event of an accident. This standard applies to waste gas from production processes such as coal preparation, coking, coke treatment, gas purification, coking chemical product recovery and thermal energy utilization. Wastewater, noise, and solid waste pollution sources are strongly accounted for. Coking furnace types include conventional coke ovens, heat recovery coke ovens, and semi-coke (blue carbon) carbonization furnaces. The source of boiler pollution carried out by GB 13223 is calculated according to HJ 888; the source of boiler pollution by GB 13271 is strong according to the boiler. The source code for strong source accounting for pollution is accounted for.

2 Normative references

This standard refers to the following documents or their terms. For undated references, the valid version applies to this standard. GB 12348 industrial enterprise boundary noise emission standard GB 13223 Thermal Power Plant Emission Standards for Thermal Power Plants GB 13271 Boiler Air Pollutant Emission Standard GB 16171 Coking Chemical Industry Pollutant Emission Standard GB/T 16157 Determination of particulate matter in fixed pollution source exhaust gas and sampling method of gaseous pollutants HJ 2.1 General Outline of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction Projects HJ 2.2 Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Atmospheric Environment HJ 2.3 Environmental Impact Assessment Technical Guidelines Surface Water Environment HJ 2.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Technical Guidelines Acoustic Environment HJ 75 Fixed pollution source flue gas (SO2, NOX, particulate matter) continuous monitoring technical specifications HJ 76 Fixed pollution source flue gas (SO2, NOX, particulate matter) continuous monitoring system technical requirements and testing methods HJ/T 91 Surface Water and Wastewater Monitoring Technical Specifications HJ/T 92 Water Pollutant Total Monitoring Technical Specification HJ/T 353 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Installation Technical Specification (Trial) HJ/T 354 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Acceptance Technical Specification (Trial) Technical Specifications for Operation and Assessment of HJ/T 355 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System (Trial) HJ/T 356 Water Pollution Source Online Monitoring System Data Validity Discrimination Technical Specification (Trial) HJ/T 373 Technical Specifications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Fixed Pollution Source Monitoring (Trial) HJ/T 397 Fixed Source Exhaust Gas Monitoring Technical Specification HJ 630 Environmental Monitoring Quality Management Technical Guidelines HJ 708 Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Steel Construction Project HJ 819 General Guidelines for Self-Monitoring Technical Units of Sewage Units HJ 878 Self-monitoring technical guide for sewage disposal units Steel industry and coking chemical industry HJ 884 Guidelines for Strong Sources of Pollution Sources HJ 888 Pollution Source Power Accounting Technical Guide Announcement on Issue of Pollution Discharge Coefficient and Material Accounting Method for Calculating Pollutant Emissions (Protection of Environmental Protection Department, No. 81,.2017) number)

3 Terms and definitions

The following terms and definitions apply to this standard. 3.1 Gas total sulfur content total sulfur in gasoline Refers to the total mass of all sulfur elements in a unit volume of gas, including inorganic sulfur, organic sulfur and so on. 3.2 Standard condition It refers to the state when the temperature is 273.15 K and the pressure is 101325 Pa. The concentration of atmospheric pollutants specified in this standard is in the standard state. The dry gas is the benchmark. 3.3 Abnormal discharge Refers to the discharge of pollutants under abnormal conditions of pollution prevention (control) facilities, such as dust removal facilities, desulfurization facilities, denitration facilities failure or inspection Emissions under abnormal conditions such as maintenance.

4 source strong accounting procedures

4.1 General principles The strong source accounting procedures include pollution source identification and pollutant determination, accounting method and parameter selection, source strength accounting, and accounting results. For details, see HJ 884 for details. 4.2 Identification of pollution sources Coking chemical industry pollution source identification should cover all places, equipment or equipment that may generate waste gas, wastewater, noise, solid waste pollutants or The device is shown in Table 1. The identification of pollution sources shall comply with the requirements of HJ 2.1, HJ 2.2, HJ 2.3, HJ 2.4, HJ 708 and so on. 4.3 Determination of pollutants The determination of pollutants in various pollution sources in the coking chemical industry shall include pollutants in national and local emission standards such as GB 16171. Table 1. Contaminants that may be produced in the production process but not included in national or local pollutant discharge standards may be based on environmental quality standards. Other industry standards, other national emission standards, local people's governments or eco-environmental authorities, environmental quality improvement needs, according to raw materials The materials and fuel use and production process conditions are analyzed and determined. 4.4 Accounting method selection The methods of calculating the source of pollution in the coking chemical industry include the actual measurement method, the analogy method, the material balance algorithm and the pollution yield coefficient method, etc. The order of priority selection is shown in Table 1. The source strength accounting method should be selected in order of priority. If the priority method cannot be adopted, reasonable reasons should be given. Table 1 Selection table of strong accounting methods for pollution source of coking chemical industry Element pollution source pollutant project Accounting method and prioritization New (reform, expansion) Engineering pollution source Existing engineering Source of pollution Exhaust gas Organized (normal row put) Clean coal crushing, coke crushing, screening And transport facility particulate matter Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method 1. Actual measurement method Coal loading facility Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 1. analogy method 2. pollution coefficient method 1. actual measurement method Benzo[a]่Š˜1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method Pushing coke facilities particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 1. Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method 1. Actual measurement method Coke oven chimney Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 2. pollution production coefficient method 1. actual measurement method Sulfur dioxide 1. Material balance algorithm 1. Actual measurement method Dry quenching facility Particulate matter 1. analogy method 2. pollution coefficient method 1. actual measurement method Sulfur dioxide 1. Material balance algorithm 1. Actual measurement method Crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia Design of burning coke oven gas such as decomposition furnace Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 2. pollution production coefficient method 1. actual measurement method Sulfur dioxide 1. Material balance algorithm 1. Actual measurement method Cold drum, tar storage in various storage areas Benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen cyanide, phenols, Non-methane total hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia 1. Analogy method 1. Measured method Benzene storage tank benzene, non-methane total hydrocarbons 1. Analogy method 1. Measured method Desulfurization regeneration tower hydrogen sulfide, ammonia 1. Analogy method 1. Actual measurement method Ammonium sulfate crystal drying facility, particulate matter, ammonia 1. Analogy method 1. Actual measurement method Organized (unusual emission) Clean coal crushing, coke crushing, screening And transfer facility particles 1. analogy Actual measurement method 2. Analogy a Coal loading facilities particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, benzo[a] ่Š˜1. Analogy Actual measurement method 2. Analogy a Pushing coke facilities particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 1. Analogy method 1. Actual measurement method 2. Analogy method a Coke oven chimney Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a Sulfur dioxide Analogy method 2. Material balance algorithm Actual measurement method 2. Analogy a Dry quenching facility Particulate matter 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a Sulfur dioxide 1. analogy method 2. material balance algorithm Actual measurement method 2. Analogy a Crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia Design of burning coke oven gas such as decomposition furnace Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a Sulfur dioxide 1. analogy method 2. material balance algorithm Actual measurement method 2. Analogy a Continued Element pollution source pollutant project Accounting method and prioritization New (reform, expansion) Engineering pollution source Existing engineering Source of pollution Exhaust gas Organized (unusual emission) Cold drum, tar storage in various storage areas Benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen cyanide, phenols, Non-methane total hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia 1. analogy method 1. actual measurement method 2. analogy method a Benzene storage facility benzene, non-methane total hydrocarbon Desulfurization regeneration tower hydrogen sulfide, ammonia Ammonium sulfate crystal drying facility particulate matter, ammonia Unorganized Coal yard, clean coal crushing, coke crushing, Screening and transfer facility particulate matter 1. analogy method 1. analogy method Coke oven body particles, benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen sulfide, Ammonia, benzene solubles 1. analogy method 1. analogy Various storage tanks benzo[a]pyrene, hydrogen cyanide, benzene, phenol Class, non-methane total hydrocarbons 1. analogy method 1. analogy Waste water Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzo[a]่Š˜1. analogy method in the wastewater discharge port of workshop or production facility 1. Measured method Independent coking enterprise wastewater discharge or Iron and steel complex coking plant wastewater exhaustion hole Suspended matter, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, 5th day biochemical oxygen demand, total phosphorus, total Nitrogen, petroleum, volatile phenol, vulcanization Matter, benzene, cyanide Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method 1. Actual measurement method Noise, various fans, pumps, air compression Noise level of noise sources such as machines and crushers 1. Analogy Actual measurement method 2. Analogy a Solid Waste Tar ammonia water separation device, ammonia tower, Ammonium sulfate saturator, desulfurization facility, off Nitrogen facility, phenol cyanide wastewater treatment station And various dust removal facilities Coal dust, coke dust, tar residue, regeneration Residue, ammonia residue, acid tar, Biochemical sludge, desulfurization waste liquid, desulfurization Waste residue, waste denitration agent, etc. Analogy method 2. Pollution coefficient method Actual measurement method 2. Analogy Note. The existing engineering pollution sources are not manually monitored according to relevant management requirements, automatic monitoring equipment for installation of pollutants or automatic monitoring equipment does not meet the requirements. In the process of environmental impact assessment management, it shall be calculated according to the method in this table after rectification according to law; in the process of sewage permit management, in accordance with the discharge permit The relevant regulations can be accounted for. a When the existing project pollution sources are strongly accounted for, when there are multiple pollution sources of the same type in the same enterprise, other pollution sources can be compared with the same type of pollution sources in the enterprise. The pollution source data accounting source is strong. 4.4.1 Exhaust gas 4.4.1.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source In the normal discharge, the gas burning facilities such as coke oven chimney, crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia decomposition furnace, and the coke dry quenching facility The sulphur oxide is calculated by the material balance algorithm; the sulphur dioxide in the coal charging and pushing facilities is preferentially calculated by the analogy method, and the sulphurization coefficient method is used. Count. Particulate matter and nitrogen oxides are preferentially calculated by analogy method, followed by the pollution yield coefficient method; Analogy accounting. Other feature factors are accounted for by analogy. The unorganized source of exhaust gas is calculated by analogy. In the case of abnormal discharge, the exhaust gas source is calculated by the analogy method, and the coal burning stove such as coke oven chimney, crude benzene tube furnace, semi-coke drying and ammonia decomposition furnace The material balance algorithm can also be used for sulfur dioxide in gas facilities and sulfur dioxide source in dry quenching facilities. 4.4.1.2 Existing engineering pollution sources In normal discharge, the organized source strength of the exhaust gas is calculated by the actual measurement method. When using the actual method to calculate the source strength, the HJ 878 and the enterprise It can be used for the automatic monitoring of pollution factors, and can only be validated by effective automatic monitoring data; for HJ 878 and corporate sewage The automatic monitoring of pollution factors is not required for licenses, etc., and automatic monitoring data is preferred, followed by manual monitoring of data. No exhaust gas Weaving source strength uses the analogy method for accounting. In the case of abnormal emissions, the exhaust gas source is calculated by the actual measurement method, and secondly, the measured data of the same type of pollution source is abnormal. Count. 4.4.2 Waste water 4.4.2.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source The pollution source of the wastewater discharge port of the workshop or production facility is calculated by analogy. The pollution source of the waste water discharge port of the independent coking enterprise or the coking branch of the iron and steel complex enterprise is preferentially calculated by analogy method. The calculation is based on the pollution coefficient method. 4.4.2.2 Existing engineering pollution sources The source of pollution is calculated by the actual measurement method. When using the actual measurement method to calculate the source strength, the requirements for HJ 878 and enterprise sewage permit are adopted. The pollution factor of the dynamic monitoring can only be calculated by using effective automatic monitoring data; it is not required for HJ 878 and enterprise sewage discharge permit. With automatic monitoring of pollution factors, automatic monitoring data is preferred, followed by manual monitoring of data. 4.4.3 Noise 4.4.3.1 New (reconstruction, expansion) construction project pollution source The source of pollution is strongly calculated using the analogy method. 4.4.3.2 Existing engineering pollution so......
Image     

Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:

Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of HJ 981-2018_English be delivered?

Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate HJ 981-2018_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 3 ~ 5 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.

Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of HJ 981-2018_English with my colleagues?

Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of HJ 981-2018_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.

Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?

Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countries

Question 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?

Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to Sales@ChineseStandard.net. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.