Home Cart Quotation Policy About-Us
www.ChineseStandard.net
SEARCH

GA/T 1674-2019 English PDF

Q: How long will the true-PDF of English version of GA/T 1674-2019 be delivered?

Upon your order, we will start to translate GA/T 1674-2019_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.

Q: Can I share the purchased PDF of GA/T 1674-2019_English with my colleagues?

Yes. The purchased PDF of GA/T 1674-2019_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.

Q: Does the price include tax/VAT?

Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries). Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) between Singapore and 100+ Countries: https://www.iras.gov.sg/taxes/international-tax

Q: Do you accept my currency other than USD?

Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to Sales@ChineseStandard.net. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.

US$139.00 · In stock
Delivery: <= 3 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email.
GA/T 1674-2019: Forensic sciences - Specifications for validation of morphological comparative methods for trace examination
Status: Valid

Standard ID	USD	BUY PDF	Lead-Days	Standard Title (Description)	Status
GA/T 1674-2019	139	Add to Cart	3 days	Forensic sciences - Specifications for validation of morphological comparative methods for trace examination	Valid

Similar standards

GA/T 1788.2 GA/T 1711 GA/T 424 GA/T 1665 GA/T 1666 GA/T 1664

Basic data

Standard ID: GA/T 1674-2019 (GA/T1674-2019)
Description (Translated English): Forensic sciences - Specifications for validation of morphological comparative methods for trace examination
Sector / Industry: Public Security (Police) Industry Standard (Recommended)
Classification of Chinese Standard: A92
Classification of International Standard: 13.310
Word Count Estimation: 6,613
Date of Issue: 2019
Date of Implementation: 2019-12-01
Issuing agency(ies): Ministry of Public Security

GA/T 1674-2019: Forensic sciences - Specifications for validation of morphological comparative methods for trace examination

---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.
Forensic sciences - Specifications for validation of morphological comparative methods for trace examination ICS 13.310 A92 Public Safety Industry Standard of the People's Republic of China Forensic science trace inspection morphological feature comparison method Confirm specifications Published on October 14,.2019 2019-12-01 Implementation Issued by the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China

Foreword

This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009. Please note that some content of this document may involve patents. The issuer of this document does not assume responsibility for identifying these patents. This standard was proposed by the National Criminal Technology Standardization Technical Committee Trace Inspection Sub-Committee (SAC/TC179/SC9) and Be in charge. This standard was drafted by. Physical Evidence Appraisal Center of the Ministry of Public Security. The main drafters of this standard. Liu Jin, Ban Maosen, Hua Feng, Chen Xia, Cui Jia, Liu Shuo, Tang Danzhou, Wang Yanbin, Bai Qinghua. Forensic science trace inspection morphological feature comparison method Confirm specifications

1 Scope

This standard stipulates the confirmation specifications for the comparison method of trace inspection morphological characteristics in the field of forensic science. This standard is applicable to the verification of new, improved and newly introduced comparison methods in the fields of handprints, footprints, tool marks, bullet marks, etc. Procedures, method confirmation procedures in other subject areas can also be used for reference.

2 Normative references

The following documents are essential for the application of this document. For dated reference documents, only the dated version applies to this article Pieces. For the cited documents without date, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to this document. CNAS-CL08 Judicial Expertise/Forensic Science Organization Competency Standards CNAS-CL49 Application of Judicial Expertise/Forensic Science Institution Approval Guidelines in the Field of Trace Expertise CNAS-AL13 Classification of Forensic Expertise/Forensic Scientific Institutions CNAS-GL36 Quality Control Guide for Forensic Expertise/Forensic Scientific Expertise Process

3 Terms and definitions

The terms and definitions defined by CNAS-CL08, CNAS-CL49, CNAS-AL13, CNAS-GL36 and the following apply to this file. 3.1 Morphological comparison method By comparing the morphological characteristics of the test material and the sample, the method of judging whether the texture and form of the test material and the sample are consistent or similar.

4 Responsibilities

Each organization is responsible for the confirmation or specific implementation of the morphological feature comparison method used in the actual case handling work to ensure that. a) The confirmation of the method should be carried out by the appraisal technical supervisor organization, and carried out by qualified personnel; b) The scientific evaluation of the method validation process should be performed by qualified personnel who should not perform method validation personnel; c) The end-users of the method should be qualified and properly trained; d) After the method is enabled, follow-up testing should be continued to ensure that the method achieves the desired effect; e) The method confirmation process should be accurately recorded and transmitted to interested organizations.

5 Basic work of morphological feature comparison method

5.1 General requirements The morphological feature comparison method should be accepted from the scientific research project that has passed the ministerial level, or published in a public journal, or most of the field ......

Image

Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:

Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of GA/T 1674-2019_English be delivered?

Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate GA/T 1674-2019_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.

Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of GA/T 1674-2019_English with my colleagues?

Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of GA/T 1674-2019_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.

Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?

Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countries

Question 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?

Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to Sales@ChineseStandard.net. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay.