HJ 1111-2020 English PDFUS$369.00 ยท In stock
Delivery: <= 3 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email. HJ 1111-2020: Technical guidelines for eco-environmental health risk assessment - General principles Status: Valid
Basic dataStandard ID: HJ 1111-2020 (HJ1111-2020)Description (Translated English): Technical guidelines for eco-environmental health risk assessment - General principles Sector / Industry: Environmental Protection Industry Standard Classification of Chinese Standard: Z01 Classification of International Standard: 13.020 Word Count Estimation: 16,165 Date of Issue: 2020 Date of Implementation: 2020-03-18 Issuing agency(ies): Ministry of Ecology and Environment HJ 1111-2020: Technical guidelines for eco-environmental health risk assessment - General principles---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order. Technical guidelines for eco-environmental health risk assessment - General principles National Environmental Protection Standards of the People's Republic of China General Outline of Technical Guidelines for Ecological Environment Health Risk Assessment 2020-03-18 released 2020-03-18 Implementation Issued by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment Table of contentsForeword...ii 1 Scope of application...1 2 Normative references...1 3 Terms and definitions...1 4 General...2 5 Plan development...3 6 Hazard identification...4 7 Hazard Characterization...6 8 Exposure Assessment...8 9 Risk Characterization...10 10 Report preparation...11ForewordIn order to implement the "Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China", strengthen ecological environment risk management, and promote the integration of the concept of public health Environmental management, guide and standardize the ecological environment health risk assessment work, formulate this standard. This standard stipulates the general principles, procedures, content, methods and technical requirements of ecological environment health risk assessment. This standard is issued for the first time. This standard was formulated by the Department of Regulations and Standards of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. The main drafting organizations of this standard. Environmental Planning Institute of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Society of Environmental Sciences, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Institute of Environmental Standards, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment. This standard was approved by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment on March 18, 2020. This standard shall be implemented from the date of issuance. This standard is interpreted by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. General Outline of Technical Guidelines for Ecological Environment Health Risk Assessment1 Scope of applicationThis standard stipulates the general principles, procedures, content, methods and technical requirements of ecological environment health risk assessment. This standard is applicable to guide the process of ecological environment management to prevent and control environmental chemical factors closely related to damage to public health And carry out environmental health risk assessment.2 Normative referencesThis standard refers to the following documents or their clauses. For undated references, the latest version (including amendments) applies In this standard. GB/T 27921 Risk Management Risk Assessment Technology HJ 839 Environmental and health field survey technical specifications cross-sectional survey HJ 875 Technical Guidelines for Population Exposure Assessment of Environmental Pollutants HJ 876 Technical Specification for Children's Soil Intake Survey Trace Element Method HJ 877 Technical Specification for Investigation of Exposure Parameters3 Terms and definitionsThe following terms and definitions apply to this standard. 3.1 Hazard identification The process of determining the types and attributes of harmful effects caused by chemical factors in the environment to people, individuals or target organs. 3.2 Hazard characterization The process of qualitatively or quantitatively describing the inherent characteristics of chemical factors in the environment that cause harmful effects of individuals or groups. 3.3 Exposure assessment The process of estimating or measuring the exposure, frequency and duration of the exposure of individuals or groups to chemical factors in the environment, including Analysis of the source, exposure route, exposure route, the number and characteristics of the exposed population and the uncertainty of the chemical factors in the environment. 3.4 Exposure scenario The description of the scene where the chemical factors in the environment migrate through different ways and reach the contact surface of the exposed receptor, that is, a description of the process of exposure. Series of facts, presumptions and assumptions. Note. Rewrite HJ 875-2017, Terminology and Definition 3.3. 3.5 Risk characterization Qualitative or quantitative analysis of the possibility of harmful effects of the target population exposed to chemical factors in the environment under specific exposure conditions and The process of its uncertainty. 3.6 Uncertainty Due to the lack of scientific understanding, the limitation of assessment methods and the lack of basic data, etc., the results of ecological environment health risk assessment are accurate Sexually affected conditions.4 General4.1 Evaluation principles 4.1.1 Scientificity Fully collect existing data and information, based on the latest scientific evidence, according to the needs of ecological environment management, assessment purposes, and data availability And effectiveness, scientifically and reasonably determine the evaluation plan to ensure the systemicity and completeness of the evaluation process and the objectivity of the evaluation conclusion. 4.1.2 Hierarchical Under the current awareness level and technical measures, according to the needs of ecological environment management, use the available data information and tools and methods, by From simple to complex, from conservative to practical, it is evaluated step by step. 4.1.3 Caution The results of risk assessment should include the health of sensitive or highly exposed people exposed to chemical factors in the environment under the most unfavourable scenario in reality. risk. 4.1.4 Transparency The entire process of risk assessment should be fully and systematically recorded. Among them, special attention should be paid to the constraints, uncertain Contents and assumptions and their processing methods, different opinions and viewpoints in the assessment, and major decisions that directly affect the results of the risk assessment. 4.2 Technical guide system for ecological environment health risk assessment The eco-environmental health risk assessment technical guide system is composed of general outline, basic method technical guide and application field technical guide. The general outline stipulates the general principles, procedures, content, methods and technical requirements of ecological environment health risk assessment. The basic method technical guide is a technical guide formulated for the general techniques and methods of each link of ecological environment health risk assessment. A certain range can be used as the basis and basis for other guidelines. Application field technical guidelines are special technical guidelines formulated for specific ecological environment management needs. 4.3 Evaluation procedure The ecological environment health risk assessment procedure includes plan formulation, hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment and risk characterization. The assessment procedure is shown in Figure 1. Hazard identification and hazard characterization together constitute a hazard assessment. The toxic effect and mode of action or mechanism determined by the hazard assessment are exposure assessment Provide a basis for the construction of exposure scenarios such as exposure pathways and exposure time. The exposure route, exposure time, exposure frequency and The exposure level and other information provide clues and basis for determining the key effect endpoints of the hazard assessment.5 Plan development5.1 Clarify the purpose of evaluation Before conducting a risk assessment, the risk assessor should fully communicate with risk managers and stakeholders, and clarify the ecological environment to be supported by the assessment. Environmental management needs or ecological environmental issues that need attention. 5.2 Determine the scope of assessment Determine the scope of assessment through data collection and analysis, personnel interviews, on-site investigations and ecological environment monitoring, including. a) Target factors. Comprehensive consideration of source characteristics, environmental behavior, hazard characteristics and management requirements, etc., to determine the Chemical factors. b) Time range. Comprehensive analysis of the hazard characteristics of the target environmental factors (such as acute or chronic), exposure time and duration, etc., Determine the time frame of the assessment. c) Spatial scope. Comprehensively analyze the source characteristics, migration and transformation, exposure pathways and population distribution of the target environmental factors to determine the assessment The spatial extent. d) Target group. According to the needs of ecological environment management, combined with the hazard characteristics of target environmental factors and the behavioral model of environmental exposure of people Types, population distribution, etc., clearly identify the population to be focused on. 5.3 Select assessment type Types of risk assessment include qualitative assessment and quantitative assessment. According to the purpose of the evaluation, data availability, accuracy requirements, time Limit requirements, personnel and funding, etc., and select the appropriate evaluation type. Qualitative assessment usually uses descriptive words such as high, medium and low to indicate risk the size of. Quantitative assessment uses a numerical value to indicate the magnitude of the risk. 5.4 Determine the data acquisition method According to the evaluation purpose and type of evaluation, methods such as literature, model prediction, experimental research or field survey are used to obtain the required data. material. Existing data should be fully utilized in the assessment, and experimental research and field investigation should be carried out when necessary. 5.5 Clarify assessment content and requirements Clarify the assessment content, methods, technical routes, quality control and the process of hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment and risk characterization. Quality assurance measures to form an evaluation plan. 5.6 Determine the evaluation plan Risk assessors should fully solicit opinions from risk managers and stakeholders, and determine the assessment plan after expert argumentation.6 Hazard identification6.1 Evaluation content Identify targets based on scientific data and literature information such as epidemiological investigations, in vivo tests, in vitro tests, and (quantitative) structure-activity relationships The toxic effects of environmental factors and their mode of action or mechanism. 6.3 Technical requirements 6.3.1 Data collection A detailed literature search strategy should be developed to comprehensively and systematically collect the hazard identification or risk issued by domestic and foreign government departments or international organizations Evaluation report, toxicity data from domestic and foreign toxicity databases, published literature and toxicity test data, etc. For the collected literature or test Test data, delete duplicate data, eliminate irrelevant data, establish a database, and record in detail the process of document or test data screening. The data types required for hazard identification include epidemiological survey data, in vivo test data, in vitro test data and (quantitative) structure-activity relationship Data etc. Specific data include. a) Basic information, including chemical name, molecular formula, structural formula, molecular weight, etc.; b) Physical and chemical properties, including density, melting point, boiling point, saturated vapor pressure and vapor density, solubility, chemical reaction of target environmental factors Application characteristics, stability, etc.; c) Metabolism data, including the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and accumulation of target environmental factors in humans and/or animals Metabolic kinetic data; d) Toxicity data, including acute toxicity of target environmental factors, skin corrosion or irritation, serious eye damage or eye irritation, respiratory tract or Skin sensitization, germ cell mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, specific target organ toxicity and inhalation hazard after one or repeated exposure Sex test data; e) Epidemiological survey data, including environmental epidemiology and occupational epidemiology data, etc.; f) Hazard level, including the acute toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity of the target environmental factors. 6.3.2 Data quality evaluation Develop a data quality evaluation plan to evaluate every aspect of research design, implementation process, quality control, data analysis, research results, etc. The reliability of an epidemiological survey, in vivo test, in vitro test and (quantitative) structure-activity relationship literature or test data, and based on the evaluation results As a result, the reliability of literature or test data is classified as high, medium, low, or no information available. At the same time assess the correlation between in vivo test, in vitro test or (quantitative) structure-activity relationship data and human toxicity, including the test substance to the target The representativeness of environmental factors, the rationality of test species selection, dose setting and end point selection, and the exposure route, method and time of exposure Relevance of exposure, etc. The literature or test data with no available information and poor relevance is eliminated, and the process of quality evaluation of the literature or test data is recorded. 6.3.3 Evidence synthesis Based on the literature or test data evaluated by data quality, identify possible health hazards or toxic effects of target environmental factors (such as acute toxicity) Sex, skin corrosion or irritation, serious eye damage or eye irritation, respiratory or skin sensitization, germ cell mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity Sexuality, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, developmental toxicity, etc.), effect endpoints (such as death, disease, changes in physiological functions or changes in biochemical metabolism Etc.) and possible modes or mechanisms of action. For each possible hazard or toxic effect, classify and summarize its human evidence and animal evidence, and evaluate the possible heterogeneity of research results Evaluate and explain the evidence of the mechanism of action of health hazards or toxic effects, and display the results concisely in the form of graphs. 6.3.4 Evidence integration Based on the comprehensive information of the evidence, for each possible health hazard or toxic effect, judge the evidence of human evidence and animal evidence separately It integrates information from different evidence chains such as human evidence, animal evidence, and mechanism evidence. Make overall judgments about the causal relationship between health hazards or toxic effects (such as convincing evidence, probable evidence, possible evidence, evidence According to insufficient data, etc.). For health hazards or toxic effects with convincing evidence or probable evidence, further hazard assessments will be carried out; For insufficient evidence, it is necessary to confirm data gaps and decide whether to supplement survey, test or model data. The content to be considered when judging the probative power of human evidence and animal evidence includes. a) The reliability of human research or animal research itself; b) The reproducibility of conclusions on the relationship between target environmental factors and health hazards or toxic effects among different studies, species or populations; c) There is a dose-response (effect) relationship between the target environmental factor exposure dose, exposure time and health hazards or toxic effects; d) The strength and accuracy of the correlation between target environmental factors and health hazards or toxic effects; e) The relationship between the target environmental factor and the health hazard or toxic effect is consistent with the known biological principles; f) The biological rationality of the toxic action mechanism. When integrating human evidence, animal evidence, and evidence of mechanism of action, full consideration should be given to the repeatability of the evidence and the consistency between different types of evidence Consistency between related health effects, evidence from sensitive populations, and other supporting evidence, such as cross-reference prediction evidence.7 Hazard characterization7.1 Evaluation content Based on hazard identification, qualitatively describe the hazard level of the target environmental factor causing the individual or group to have harmful effects; or establish the target environment The dose-response (effect) relationship between factor exposure and harmful effects, to derive toxicity parameters. 7.2 Evaluation steps The hazard characterization assessment steps are shown in Figure 3.Generally follow the steps below. a) Retrieve and evaluate the applicability of the conclusions on the hazards of target environmental factors issued by domestic and foreign government departments or international organizations. domestic If foreign government departments or international organizations have issued hazard characterization conclusions and applicable, they can be directly quoted; domestic and foreign government departments or international organizations have not published If the hazard characterization conclusion is issued, or the hazard characterization conclusion has been issued but is not applicable after evaluation, the risk assessor shall contact the risk manager and stakeholders Communication determines whether to continue the hazard characterization; after communication, if it is not necessary to continue, the hazard characterization will be terminated. b) If the hazard characterization continues, determine the effect endpoint for the hazard characterization based on the hazard identification result and screen the relevant data. c) Perform data quality evaluation on the hazard characterization data. If the requirements are met, the hazard level is divided, or the dose-response (effect (Should) model and derive toxicity parameters; if the requirements are not met and hazard characterization needs to be continued, test or survey data should be supplemented. 7.3 Technical requirements 7.3.1 Qualitative hazard characterization The existing hazard classification results can be used directly, or according to the toxicity classification standards issued by domestic and foreign government departments or international organizations (such as chemical Product classification and labeling specifications), to classify the hazard levels of target environmental factors; or to establish a hazard level evaluation index system to determine Standard weight, construct hazard evaluation index, qualitatively or semi-quantitatively evaluate the hazard level of target environmental factors. 7.3.2 Quantitative hazard characterization 7.3.2.1 Data requirements and evaluation The data required for hazard characterization includes epidemiological data, in vivo test data, in vitro test data and (quantitative) structure-activity relationship data. Preference is given to ......Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of HJ 1111-2020_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate HJ 1111-2020_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 1 ~ 3 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of HJ 1111-2020_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of HJ 1111-2020_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to Sales@ChineseStandard.net. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay. |
