CYT103-2014 English PDFUS$379.00 ยท In stock
Delivery: <= 4 days. True-PDF full-copy in English will be manually translated and delivered via email. CYT103-2014: (Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol) Status: Valid
Basic dataStandard ID: CY/T 103-2014 (CY/T103-2014)Description (Translated English): (Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol) Sector / Industry: Press & Publication Industry Standard (Recommended) Word Count Estimation: 15,121 Date of Issue: 1/29/2014 Date of Implementation: 1/29/2014 Regulation (derived from): News-Broadcasting-Press-Letter 2014 [11] Issuing agency(ies): State Press and Publication Administration CYT103-2014: (Database Publications Quality Assessment Protocol)---This is a DRAFT version for illustration, not a final translation. Full copy of true-PDF in English version (including equations, symbols, images, flow-chart, tables, and figures etc.) will be manually/carefully translated upon your order.Specification for Quality Evaluation of Database Publication Issued by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China Press and Publication Industry Standards of the People's Republic of China Specification for quality evaluation of database publications 2014-01-29 implementation Released on January 29,.2014 Table of contents1 Scope...1 2 Terms and definitions...1 3 Evaluation dimensions and requirements...1 3.1 Quality model...1 3.2 Evaluation model...2 3.3 Quality requirements...2 3.3.1 Process quality...2 3.3.2 Content quality...3 3.3.3 Publication quality...3 3.3.4 Technical quality...4 3.3.5 Quality of use...4 4 Evaluation principles and methods...5 4.1 Evaluation principles...5 4.2 Evaluation method...5 4.3 Evaluation information sources...5 5 Evaluation indicators and procedures...5 5.1 Individual indicators...5 5.2 Comprehensive indicators...6 5.3 Quality level...6 5.4 Utilization of evaluation score results...6 5.5 Evaluation procedures...6 Appendix A (Normative Appendix) Quality Model and Evaluation Index Table...8 References...9ForewordThis standard is compiled in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009 "Guidelines for Standardization Work Part 1.Standard Structure and Compilation". Appendix A of this standard is a normative appendix. This standard was proposed and managed by the National Press and Publication Information Standardization Technical Committee. The main drafting organizations of this standard. Beijing Wanfang Data Co., Ltd., Information Center of the Press and Publication Administration. The main drafters of this standard. Zhang Xiumei, Liu Chengyong, Zhang Yong, Yang Yihong, Ling Feng, Wu Zhiqiang, Zhang Mo, Cheng Yuhua, Xu Jianwu, Liu Liying. Specification for quality evaluation of database publications1 ScopeThis standard specifies the dimensions and requirements of database publication quality evaluation, evaluation principles and methods, evaluation index scales and evaluation procedures. This standard applies to the quality evaluation of database publications.2 Terms and definitionsThe following terms and definitions apply to this standard. 2.1 Database A collection of information or factual data organized logically. 2.2 Database publication The mass media that takes the database as the content and provides one or more search methods to facilitate users to locate and access the database content. 2.3 Database publishing The production and service process of database publications.3 Evaluation dimensions and requirements3.1 Quality model The quality model of database publications is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Database publication quality model The different dimensions in the quality model have the following correlations. a) The database publishing process directly affects the explicit attribute quality of database publications, and the explicit attribute quality directly affects its utility; b) The quality of the explicit attributes of database publications depends on the database publication process. 3.2 Evaluation model The database publication quality evaluation includes five dimensions. process quality, content quality, publication quality, technical quality, and use quality. The evaluation indicators included in the dimension are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 Database publication quality evaluation model 3.3 Quality requirements 3.3.1 Process quality 3.3.1.1 Publication process specification The database publishing unit shall establish and implement standardized publication procedures such as drafting, editing, review, production, typesetting, printing, and distribution. 3.3.1.2 Management evaluation system The database publishing unit shall establish and implement a systematic and standardized management evaluation system to ensure the quality of all aspects of publications. From responsibility Measure the establishment and implementation of the editing system, editor-in-chief responsibility system, and review system. 3.3.1.3 Personnel qualifications Personnel engaged in database publishing-related work in database publishing units shall meet the qualifications and conditions prescribed by the state. From the president and editor-in-chief The professional qualifications of other relevant personnel and other relevant personnel shall be measured. 3.3.1.4 Advertising management system The advertisements involved in database publications shall comply with relevant regulations. From the legality of the advertising method, the legality of the advertising content, etc. Measure in terms of aspects. 3.3.2 Content quality 3.3.2.1 Legality The content of database publications should comply with national laws, regulations and departmental rules related to publications. Whether it violates the Constitution, laws, regulations, Measure whether it infringes the copyright of others and whether it infringes the legal rights and interests of others. 3.3.2.2 Authenticity The content description of database publications should respect objective facts and be measured according to the degree of conformity between the content description and the facts. 3.3.2.3 Accuracy The content of database publications should be correct and effective. It is measured in terms of the reliability of the content source, the relevance of the content description and a specific topic, etc. 3.3.2.4 Completeness The content of the database publication should contain all the content elements that should be included, and a comprehensive and complete description of the topic of the publication. From the content Measure the coverage and the completeness of the item content. 3.3.2.5 Timeliness The content of database publications should include relevant content in a timely and effective manner to meet industry characteristics or user needs. Measured by the content lag period. 3.3.2.6 Value The content of database publications should be able to provide users with valuable information and actively promote users' practical activities. From the content The authority of the source may be measured by other recognized content value evaluation methods. 3.3.3 Publication quality 3.3.3.1 Language specification Database publications should comply with the general language and writing standards of their respective types of publications and the general standards for published language and writing, from text, grammar, Punctuation, number usage, unit of measurement, knowledge usage, etc. shall be measured; the character set encoding shall comply with the corresponding national standards. 3.3.3.2 Layout specification Database publications should comply with the layout specifications of the respective types of publications and the corresponding layout specifications of various materials such as graphics, text, audio, and video. 3.3.3.3 Publication format specification Different types of database publications should follow the corresponding type of publication norms. 3.3.3.4 Publication cycle control Database publications should comply with relevant publication cycle control. From whether there is a fixed or compliant publication cycle and according to the publication week Strictly implement the angle for measurement during the period. 3.3.3.5 Continuous update Database publications should continue to enrich and improve their contents. Determine whether it has an update frequency that meets the characteristics of the content itself 3.3.4 Technical quality 3.3.4.1 Functional technology Database publications should be able to effectively realize its functions. Check whether the database publication meets the technical specifications and technical functions of the corresponding carrier Measure the completeness and advancement of energy. 3.3.4.2 Non-functional technology Database publications should meet other technical aspects besides basic functional requirements, such as. security, stability, scalability Performance, ease of operation and deployment, etc. 3.3.5 Quality of use 3.3.5.1 Validity Database publications should be available, and effectively help users find relevant content for reading. Passing content inspection rate and accuracy rate The standard is measured. 3.3.5.2 Efficiency Database publications should be able to meet users' requirements for retrieval performance and response time, and help users quickly solve problems. Search by user The response speed of the system is measured during the process. 3.3.5.3 Fault tolerance Database publications should be able to allow certain errors to occur and help users recover from errors. 3.3.5.4 Ease of use Database publications should be easy to learn and provide appropriate guidance and help information, show what users want and guide users to complete tasks. From Whether it is easy to reach and whether it is easy to use is measured.4 Evaluation principles and methods4.1 Evaluation principles Evaluation principles include. a) Accurate, comprehensive and fair; b) Consider both social and economic benefits; c) Consider development and application prospects; d) Consider the types and characteristics of different database publications; e) Follow relevant national standards, international standards, industry standards and related technical specifications. 4.2 Evaluation method 4.2.1 Objective evaluation Used for indicators that can be directly evaluated based on objective and authoritative data. According to relevant national laws and regulations, national standards, and industry Standards, etc., to determine whether the database publication meets the relevant requirements of the corresponding laws, regulations, and standard documents. 4.2.2 Subjective evaluation Use the following 2 methods for subjective evaluation. a) Expert evaluation. It is used for indicators that need to be evaluated from the perspective of professional knowledge. Experts in the field of database and publishing Evaluation of database publications; b) User evaluation. Indicators used for evaluation from the perspective of user use. The users of database publications will evaluate the database from the perspective of use. Evaluation of publications. 4.3 Evaluation information sources The information sources used to evaluate the quality of database publications include the database publication itself, the certification materials provided by the database publishing unit, and Other reliable sources of information. among them. a) If the evaluation can be achieved through direct observation or the use of database publications, the database publication itself should be used as the source of evaluation information; b) If it involves content that cannot be directly reflected in database publications, such as management procedures, systems, etc., the database publication list should be used The certification materials provided by the position as the source of the evaluation information; c) In addition, information from reliable third-party sources can also be used as a reference for evaluation, such as the press and publication management department or the business management department Reward and punishment information for publications or publishing units, etc.5 Evaluation indicators and procedures5.1 Individual indicators The type of scale used in the measurement process uses a scoring system for the evaluation indicators, and the specific scores are given when the indicators are measured. The score table is shown in Table 1. 5.2 Comprehensive indicators According to the content and type of the database publication to be evaluated, determine whether each individual evaluation index is a key evaluation index one by one, and then calculate The arithmetic average of the scores of various indicators is used as the comprehensive evaluation score of the quality of database publications. 5.3 Quality level The quality level is divided into qualified and unqualified according to the key indicator scores and comprehensive evaluation scores. The corresponding score requirements are as follows. a) Qualified. each key evaluation index is equal to or higher than 3 points, and the comprehensive evaluation score is equal to or higher than 3 points; b) Unqualified. Any item of the key evaluation indicators is less than 3 points, or the comprehensive evaluation score is less than 3 points. 5.4 Utilization of evaluation score results When evaluating a single database publication, you can use the comprehensive evaluation score or the above-mentioned quality level to evaluate the results; for two or more When evaluating and comparing a database publication, a comparative evaluation can be made based on the results of the quality grade evaluation through the comprehensive evaluation score. 5.5 Evaluation procedure The quality evaluation of database publications will be raised in the following situations. a) When the management department or distribution unit wants to compare and appraise the pros and cons of several database publications; b) When the database publication is completed and the results need to be declared; c) When the user needs to purchase or use a certain database publication; d) When the database publishing unit needs to understand the market effect of the publication; e) Other needs. The quality evaluation procedure of database publications is shown in Figure 3. According to Article 5 of this standard, combined with the content and type of database publications to be evaluated, Further refine and determine the specific measurement indicators (the above-mentioned quality requirements refer to the measurement Degree indicators are for reference only) and related evaluation rules. Measure and collect various types of data for evaluation, and study and analyze the data in accordance with the evaluation rules. According to the analysis of evaluation rules and data, complete the evaluation report.Appendix A(Normative appendix) Quality model and evaluation index table The quality model and evaluation index comparison table are shown in Table A.1. ......Tips & Frequently Asked Questions:Question 1: How long will the true-PDF of CYT103-2014_English be delivered?Answer: Upon your order, we will start to translate CYT103-2014_English as soon as possible, and keep you informed of the progress. The lead time is typically 2 ~ 4 working days. The lengthier the document the longer the lead time.Question 2: Can I share the purchased PDF of CYT103-2014_English with my colleagues?Answer: Yes. The purchased PDF of CYT103-2014_English will be deemed to be sold to your employer/organization who actually pays for it, including your colleagues and your employer's intranet.Question 3: Does the price include tax/VAT?Answer: Yes. Our tax invoice, downloaded/delivered in 9 seconds, includes all tax/VAT and complies with 100+ countries' tax regulations (tax exempted in 100+ countries) -- See Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs): List of DTAs signed between Singapore and 100+ countriesQuestion 4: Do you accept my currency other than USD?Answer: Yes. If you need your currency to be printed on the invoice, please write an email to Sales@ChineseStandard.net. In 2 working-hours, we will create a special link for you to pay in any currencies. Otherwise, follow the normal steps: Add to Cart -- Checkout -- Select your currency to pay. |
